CyclingNews Forum  

Go Back   CyclingNews Forum > Road > The Clinic

The Clinic The Clinic is the only place on Cyclingnews where you can discuss doping-related issues. Ask questions, discuss positives or improvements to procedures.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-06-09, 11:26
blackcat's Avatar
blackcat blackcat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,147
Default

NB. those were my upper estimates. I know their are jnrs doping, I know there are masters doping. But the ones that dope would be in the slim minority. Miniscule numbers. And not everyone is doping in the pro field. To assume the market is this big, you must come from the BigBoat school of conspiracy that EVERYONE dopes. No way. There are 450 Protour riders. Plus another 400 in Europe. 200 who make a living in US. 1000 top espoirs. 500 top jnrs. Are they all on Amgen manufactured epo? No way. Perhaps 1% of them get some black market epo that was from an Amgen facility. Lots are doping on epo bio-similars and autologous blood I appreciate it. And the percentage none higher than the Protour.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-06-09, 15:30
HoustonHammer's Avatar
HoustonHammer HoustonHammer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Flat, Flat Houston
Posts: 64
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackcat View Post
I add it up like Martinello too.
<snip>
Where is the market? I just cannot see the market this big.
I don't know what the rest of the EPO market looks like, so it's hard to say. But I don't think that's the point. Unless I missed it, I didn't think anybody was saying that the pharma companies see elite athletes as an end market. The suggestion seems to be that they can be a useful source of guinea pigs during the drug development phase. That's an appealing argument, but I don't buy it.

I'm also very skeptical of conspiracy theories. BASIL asked how athletes got the drug before it was released. That's a good question, but are sure they did have it prior to release? In the US, Epogen/Procrit was first approved by the FDA for sale in 1989.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-06-09, 15:38
HoustonHammer's Avatar
HoustonHammer HoustonHammer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Flat, Flat Houston
Posts: 64
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HoustonHammer View Post
I'm also very skeptical of conspiracy theories.


Notwithstanding my preceding logic-based post, here's a couple of points for the committed conspiracy-theory nuts to discuss amongst themselves:
- Is is just coincidence that Amgen decided to market EPO under the trade name "ProCrit". Hmmm?
- Check out this link: Access to the site is split for 'Patients' and 'Professionals'. Talk about cheek- they don't even try to hide it!!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-06-09, 15:42
MiXels MiXels is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HoustonHammer View Post


Access to the site is split for 'Patients' and 'Professionals'. Talk about cheek- they don't even try to hide it!!
Health Care Professionals.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-06-09, 15:52
HoustonHammer's Avatar
HoustonHammer HoustonHammer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Flat, Flat Houston
Posts: 64
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MiXels View Post
Health Care Professionals.
That link was for conspiracy nuts.

Here's one for you.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-06-09, 16:02
MiXels MiXels is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HoustonHammer View Post
That link was for conspiracy nuts.

Here's one for you.
I assumed as much. Of course, irony and sarcasm are often lost in translation on the internet.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-06-09, 16:05
HoustonHammer's Avatar
HoustonHammer HoustonHammer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Flat, Flat Houston
Posts: 64
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MiXels View Post
I assumed as much. Of course, irony and sarcasm are often lost in translation on the internet.
Fair enough. I could have set it up better
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-06-09, 19:34
Martinello Martinello is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 41
Default

Quote:
I'm also very skeptical of conspiracy theories. BASIL asked how athletes got the drug before it was released. That's a good question, but are sure they did have it prior to release? In the US, Epogen/Procrit was first approved by the FDA for sale in 1989.
No pharmaceutical company would use professional athletes as illegitimate guinea pigs for their new drugs. There is an entire continent called Africa full of human specimens where they don't give a damn about GxP, ethics committees or clinicaltrials.org.
HBOC (haemoglobin based oxygen carriers) have been tested extensively in poor Africans with sickle cell anaemia and thallessemia. Why bother with a couple of crazy cyclists when you can get good quality, controlled data???
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-06-09, 20:48
HoustonHammer's Avatar
HoustonHammer HoustonHammer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Flat, Flat Houston
Posts: 64
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Martinello View Post
No pharmaceutical company would use professional athletes as illegitimate guinea pigs for their new drugs. There is an entire continent called Africa full of human specimens where they don't give a damn about GxP, ethics committees or clinicaltrials.org.
HBOC (haemoglobin based oxygen carriers) have been tested extensively in poor Africans with sickle cell anaemia and thallessemia. Why bother with a couple of crazy cyclists when you can get good quality, controlled data???
Exactly. Why have a small inconsequential conspiracy theory when you can have a massive, gonzo, insane conspiracy theory? I mean, bigger is better, right?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:17.


Copyright 2006 - 2009 Future Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Future Publishing Limited is part of the Future plc group. Future Publishing Limited is a company registered in England and Wales with company registration number 2008885 whose registered office is at Beauford Court 30 Monmouth Street Bath, UK BA1 2BW England.