Stars and Watercarriers - Page 7 - CyclingNews Forum

Go Back   CyclingNews Forum > Road > Professional road racing

Professional road racing A place to discuss all things related to current professional road races. Here, you can also touch on the latest news relating to professional road racing. A doping discussion free forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 11-22-12, 00:09
Afrank's Avatar
Afrank Afrank is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 8,590
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kurtinsc View Post
Tejay Van Garderen did just win the white jersey at the tour (5th overall), as well as 5th at Paris-Nice. Andrew Talansky finished second at the Tour of Romandie and 7th in the Vuelta. Peter Stetina hasn't had a great result yet, but finished 21st at the Giro this past year. Not sure if Farrar can get back to competing in mass sprints or morph into a rider who can compete in the cobbled races, but he's been a solid sprinter in the recent past.

The US presence isn't as big as it was under the group of guys now being ushered out of the sport, but it's as big or bigger then any other time.
There are also several up and coming American u23's, Dombrowski, Boswell, Rathe, Craddock and Mannion I could see becoming good riders.

Quote:
Originally Posted by El Pistolero View Post
Actually, having seen American cycling fans with my own eyes: they don't care about the Giro, they don't care about the Vuelta. They only care for two races: the Tour and Paris-Roubaix.
Not all American cycling fans are like that. I know many racers who are big cycling fans that care about a lot more than just the Tour and Roubaix.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 11-22-12, 11:29
El Pistolero's Avatar
El Pistolero El Pistolero is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 14,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Afrank View Post
There are also several up and coming American u23's, Dombrowski, Boswell, Rathe, Craddock and Mannion I could see becoming good riders.



Not all American cycling fans are like that. I know many racers who are big cycling fans that care about a lot more than just the Tour and Roubaix.
I'm not talking about the type of fan that visits cycling forums.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryo Hazuki View Post
horrible. boonen just the same guy as years before and this course is too hard for him. that's why he rode like a coward there were at least 3 guys stronger than boonen today and none of them won: sagan, ballan, pozzato
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Hitch
Goss will woop boonens candy ass in a sprint he cares about, any day of the week
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 11-22-12, 11:34
theyoungest theyoungest is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,061
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by El Pistolero View Post
I'm not talking about the type of fan that visits cycling forums.
The Tour is the only thing that matters for casual cycling fans the world over. It's not a uniquely American thing.

Basically it's two different sports: the Tour de France (huge all over the world) and regular road cycling (less so).
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 11-22-12, 12:42
El Pistolero's Avatar
El Pistolero El Pistolero is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 14,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by theyoungest View Post
The Tour is the only thing that matters for casual cycling fans the world over. It's not a uniquely American thing.

Basically it's two different sports: the Tour de France (huge all over the world) and regular road cycling (less so).
That's mostly true, but I've noticed a special love from American cycling fans for Paris-Roubaix. If you look at some videos from Tour of California press conference you notice it too. When they talk to Boonen for example they will ask about his Roubaix wins, but almost never mention his wins in the Ronde.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryo Hazuki View Post
horrible. boonen just the same guy as years before and this course is too hard for him. that's why he rode like a coward there were at least 3 guys stronger than boonen today and none of them won: sagan, ballan, pozzato
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Hitch
Goss will woop boonens candy ass in a sprint he cares about, any day of the week
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 11-22-12, 13:00
jamiephillips jamiephillips is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Ipswich, England.
Posts: 425
Default

Ok slightly but not 100% off topic. I was flicking through an old Watson book about the spring classics. The foreword was written by Sean Kelly and he claimed that when he rode his first Milan-San Remo in 1978 there were 350 starters! I know that M-SR famously has a large field but 350 seems huge.
Anyone know if Kelly's claim is accurate??

"EDIT" Just checked on milansanremo.co.uk and in 1978 there were in fact 225 starters so Kelly is full of s**t!

Last edited by jamiephillips; 11-22-12 at 13:21. Reason: Found the answer!
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 11-22-12, 13:01
maltiv maltiv is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by El Pistolero View Post
That's mostly true, but I've noticed a special love from American cycling fans for Paris-Roubaix. If you look at some videos from Tour of California press conference you notice it too. When they talk to Boonen for example they will ask about his Roubaix wins, but almost never mention his wins in the Ronde.
Same in Norway. The average sports fan will only know or care about TDF and P-R. Which is probably why P-R is EBH's nr 1 goal for next season even though the race doesn't suit him at all (I'd give him a better chance of winning LBL...)
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 11-22-12, 15:00
Capablanca and me's Avatar
Capablanca and me Capablanca and me is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 70
Default

read some nice point of view, thx
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 11-22-12, 16:16
hiero2's Avatar
hiero2 hiero2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: In Descartes' reality
Posts: 2,624
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by El Pistolero View Post
But is cycling more popular in Europe now then in the 70s?
. . .
Interesting possibility. The US bike boom in the 70's was VERY big. It is possible it was bigger than the one in the late 80's, or the one in the 2-aughts. What has changed, though, is the general public's awareness of cycling as a sport. In the 70's, there WASN'T any public awareness of it. It was all new. The bike booms in the 80's and the 2-aughts benefit from the earlier knowledge gains. They might SEEM bigger, and not actually BE bigger. I couldn't say - maybe somebody has some numbers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by El Pistolero View Post
No, not that. Just saying it's still very much a European sport these days.

Less popular in West-Europe(nowadays), but more popular outside of the traditional European cycling countries. I just don't see this supposed internationality of cycling. It's a European sport down to its core.

Australia and Great Britain have made the greatest leaps since the day of Merckx. USA had great cyclists in the past, but now there's few great American cyclists anymore. . . .
I can't agree here. There are plenty of great US cyclists today. We're just short a GT winner at the moment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by silverrocket View Post
Yes of course more precise training techniques have existed for a long time (eg. Coppi and intervals), but I maintain that there have been a lot of advancements, and a mainstreaming of said advancements. . .
Quote:
Originally Posted by silverrocket View Post
Technology has changed the methods. Nobody had heart rate monitors, nevermind power meters, in Merckx's time, for example.

Also the 60s-70s marked a transition in training techniques. Some still were doing the "ride lots", some only trained by racing lots, while some subscribed to the more precise training programs. De Vlaminck said his training goal was simply to ride more than anybody else, with 400km long training rides.
Absolutely agree. I don't know how anyone can believe it is rational to argue that training was the "same" in Coppi's time as today. Up until the past 20 years or so, sports science barely existed - and what did exist did not have universal following. When Coppi said "this is the best method", you would have somebody else, also a big name, saying, "THIS, over HERE, is the best method". So, it was who you chose to believe, and partisan. A good example is intervals. They started to get attention in the 70's, resulting from the Finn "fartlek" in X-country skiing, compared to the Swedes' LSD training regime. I tell you this from memory, so if somebody comes up with a little more accurate reprise, no skin off my nose. But I don't remember seeing intervals in cycle training until the 80's. Today, with the internet and the advancements in sports science knowledge base, things are a lot different.
__________________
It is of great use to the sailor to know the length of his line, though he cannot with it fathom all the depths of the ocean. ~ John Locke
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 11-22-12, 16:25
hiero2's Avatar
hiero2 hiero2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: In Descartes' reality
Posts: 2,624
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyWorks View Post
You are joining a few things together here that didn't really go together at the time.
At the time, there were 13-26 freewheels. The deal was that the shifting on such a wide block at the time was not great compared to a 13-24. Campag was the gold-medal standard in bike transmissions and Campag shifting wasn't very good at all. Trying to use a 26 only made matters worse.

Shifting just wasn't very good, so wide range gears were pretty much a non-starter in racing.


Again, two things happened simultaneously.
1. Shimano figured out index shifting.
2. Shimano's rear mech meaningfully improved shifting under all conditions.

Shortly after Shimano's solution, there were other index shifting solutions but none as good as Shimano's because Shimano figured out a better rear mech.



Because the Pro Peloton was still riding French and Italian transmissions. Meanwhile Shimano was innovating, not a big player at all in Pro bicycle stuff and stuck on the low-end of bike culture/industry. Index shifting and the mountain bike group changed that. Sometime after, they had the budget to spend on outfitting a Pro Team.

I haven't seen that movie since VHS days, but I recall it being well done and felt like the movie itself held up pretty well over time. Well told story, good editing, etc.
You are saying the same I did, although you are doing perhaps a better job of saying it. And I agree that you left out SunTour. As I recall, they actually did most of the innovation Shimano later built on. But, for our purposes here, a brief history, it doesn't really matter.

While Campy was the "gold standard", my personal fav was the "Crane", for a long-cage rear shift. And, yeah, in comparison to transmissions today, they were pretty clunky. All that extra gearing weighed more too, in an era when riders argued about saving weight measured in grams!
__________________
It is of great use to the sailor to know the length of his line, though he cannot with it fathom all the depths of the ocean. ~ John Locke
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 11-23-12, 20:01
Echoes Echoes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,456
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by silverrocket View Post
I was paraphrasing, here's a quote explaining why he put in such huge mileage:

“It was important for me to know that I was doing more than the others.”
That quote is correct and not the same as what you said the other day.

I've already said on this forum that De Vlaeminck trained on intervals. There's a detailed description of his training programmes (for cyclocross) in the book "De Flandriens van het Veld". Intervals, Endurance, Fitness/Gym, running. "Intensive and diversified programme", said Wuyts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by coinneach View Post
The biggest doping change was EPO/Blood, (in the 90's-00)
Agreed. Finally !

Quote:
Originally Posted by theyoungest
The Tour is the only thing that matters for casual cycling fans the world over. It's not a uniquely American thing.

Basically it's two different sports: the Tour de France (huge all over the world) and regular road cycling (less so).
This is the most disgusting display of elitist bull**** I've ever seen on this forum.

If that's what it is to be Dutch, I'd rather be where I am than where you are.

It's a shame that there are mods here that would stop me from insulting you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hiero2
A good example is intervals. They started to get attention in the 70's, resulting from the Finn "fartlek" in X-country skiing, compared to the Swedes' LSD training regime. I tell you this from memory, so if somebody comes up with a little more accurate reprise, no skin off my nose. But I don't remember seeing intervals in cycle training until the 80's.
What?? The fartlek vs LSD debate happened in the 30's !!! The Finns used fartlek in the 20's. Paavo Nurmi among others.

Intervals generalized in the mid sixties, as I already mentioned. I have plenty of books to confirm this. Besides the "Flandrien van het veld" mentioned above, the most interesting for me was the book by Mark Van Hamme about Jempi Monseré "Voor altijd 22" in which the late Doctor Derluyn described his partnership with Jempi since amateur years (after Jempi's shock death he collaborated with Maertens).

If thinks only changed in the eighties, why would Geminiani say in his "Mes 5 géants du cyclisme" that Hinault was not an innovator because there was nothing left to innovate (or something like that).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:48.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2006 - 2009 Future Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Future Publishing Limited is part of the Future plc group. Future Publishing Limited is a company registered in England and Wales with company registration number 2008885 whose registered office is at Beauford Court 30 Monmouth Street Bath, UK BA1 2BW England.