Originally Posted by martinvickers
I presume, dangerous as that is, that one of the accusers is alleged to be Daryll, and the 'employee' is alleged to be Sutton.
If so, I agree, 'the employee's response stinks to high heaven, and Brailsford should be challenged publicly on it urgently. I'd choose a different media outlet, or outlets, to the Mail personally, they're sh*t all use. BBC/ABC(aus) for starters.
It doesn't matter who the employee or accusers are, you appear to be missing the point. Over a month ago accusations were made and nothing - read that word again coz it's pertinent - NOTHING has happened. Challenged publicly on it urgently. What fantasy land are you living in.
When has Brailsford been challenged on anything. cf Hayles and his 50.3% Hct in 2008. Good grief man get a grip.
The fact that you completely missed this story is telling - you simply come in and harass Darryl about telling someone when clearly it would have no effect. And what does Darryl say - it's a PR exercise - which you then disagree with.
Well it looks like Darryl is right and you don't have a clue.
Tell the media, you say, but ignore the fact Sky are the media. A well-funded and influential media at that.
Gallagher brought out a story and has since been feted by Sky to sing their praises and it's working a charm.
Challenged publicly on it urgently. Bahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahaa.
Good one. You doing standup now?