CyclingNews Forum  

Go Back   CyclingNews Forum > Road > The Clinic

The Clinic The Clinic is the only place on Cyclingnews where you can discuss doping-related issues. Ask questions, discuss positives or improvements to procedures.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #191  
Old 11-07-09, 09:13
Mellow Velo's Avatar
Mellow Velo Mellow Velo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,453
Default

So, now it's official. It's all gone away.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/klod...-investigation


I find the German attitude incredibly hard to fathom.
On the face of it, they are the most anti-doping hard liners on the planet.
German tv cancels their national tour. All their media coverage pulled from the Tour, due to ongoing doping revelations surrounding the race.
Endless moral preaching in their press.

Yet, when it comes to dishing out justice to an implicated rider, it's a quick back hander to effectively turn a blind eye.
Reply With Quote
  #192  
Old 11-07-09, 10:19
craig1985's Avatar
craig1985 craig1985 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 1,345
Default

And he is still considered innocent!
Reply With Quote
  #193  
Old 11-07-09, 15:17
Cobblestones's Avatar
Cobblestones Cobblestones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 751
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mellow Velo View Post
So, now it's official. It's all gone away.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/klod...-investigation


I find the German attitude incredibly hard to fathom.
On the face of it, they are the most anti-doping hard liners on the planet.
German tv cancels their national tour. All their media coverage pulled from the Tour, due to ongoing doping revelations surrounding the race.
Endless moral preaching in their press.

Yet, when it comes to dishing out justice to an implicated rider, it's a quick back hander to effectively turn a blind eye.
For the last time, this is the civil suit. It would have decided whether Kloden defrauded the T mobile team by taking PEDs. This suit was kind of a farce anyway, since most likely, doping was team sanctioned.

It is not the decision whether to ban Kloden or not. That lies with the Swiss Federation who issued Kloden's racing license. Don't blame the German's, blame the Swiss. They haven't gotten their a$$es in gear. I'm sure the Germans (unlike the Spanish in the case of the OP) would like to share their evidence with the Swiss if they'd bother to ask. Or, looking at it from a different angle: why do you think Kloden, Ullrich etc. were racing with a Swiss license, and not a German one?
Reply With Quote
  #194  
Old 11-07-09, 15:18
scribe's Avatar
scribe scribe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,191
Default

Freebird forever.
__________________
Stand on my dog and I'll cut your head off
Reply With Quote
  #195  
Old 11-07-09, 15:56
python's Avatar
python python is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 317
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobblestones View Post
For the last time, this is the civil suit. It would have decided whether Kloden defrauded the T mobile team by taking PEDs. This suit was kind of a farce anyway, since most likely, doping was team sanctioned.

It is not the decision whether to ban Kloden or not. That lies with the Swiss Federation who issued Kloden's racing license. Don't blame the German's, blame the Swiss. They haven't gotten their a$$es in gear. I'm sure the Germans (unlike the Spanish in the case of the OP) would like to share their evidence with the Swiss if they'd bother to ask. Or, looking at it from a different angle: why do you think Kloden, Ullrich etc. were racing with a Swiss license, and not a German one?
it's a valid point. i have not seen anywhere a clear statement as to what exactly the civil suit was about. if as you say doping was sanctioned by the "team" it would be important to know who was defrauded under the tag "team" in a legal sense - the team management or the corporate tmobile entity. i can see your point but if tmobile corporation pushed the defrauding card i don't see the case being dropped so easily. still, i trust it would be fairly easy to establish if kloeden attended the clinic and received the transfusion. there mustof been more parities to the affair than just sinkewitz.
Reply With Quote
  #196  
Old 11-07-09, 23:49
Cobblestones's Avatar
Cobblestones Cobblestones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 751
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by python View Post
it's a valid point. i have not seen anywhere a clear statement as to what exactly the civil suit was about. if as you say doping was sanctioned by the "team" it would be important to know who was defrauded under the tag "team" in a legal sense - the team management or the corporate tmobile entity. i can see your point but if tmobile corporation pushed the defrauding card i don't see the case being dropped so easily. still, i trust it would be fairly easy to establish if kloeden attended the clinic and received the transfusion. there mustof been more parities to the affair than just sinkewitz.
It seems that T mobile was not interested in this suit. I think it was brought forward by a civil prosecutor, not the T mobile team. This might have been the reason it went the way it did. By the way, it's the same outcome as for Ullrich (although he might have paid ten times as much).
Reply With Quote
  #197  
Old 11-09-09, 13:10
Fourier Fourier is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 29
Default

I guess the right amount of money will buy you out of a suspension. He'll fit right in on The Shack.
Reply With Quote
  #198  
Old 11-10-09, 20:57
blackcat's Avatar
blackcat blackcat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,147
Default

wonder how he feels being cuckolded into StrongArm's empire.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:12.


Copyright 2006 - 2009 Future Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Future Publishing Limited is part of the Future plc group. Future Publishing Limited is a company registered in England and Wales with company registration number 2008885 whose registered office is at Beauford Court 30 Monmouth Street Bath, UK BA1 2BW England.