Sky - Page 1089 - Cyclingnews Forum

Go Back   Cyclingnews Forum > Road > The Clinic

The Clinic The Clinic is the only place on Cyclingnews where you can discuss doping-related issues. Ask questions, discuss positives or improvements to procedures.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #10881  
Old 12-28-12, 21:02
xcleigh xcleigh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 238
Default

6) They're McQuaid's best friends. Phat 'predicted' Wiggo's TdF victory long before they had reached Paris.

McQuaid is good at cover ups. Apart from when asked straight questions. 'Is Wiggins going to win the Tour, Pat?' Yes. Doh!
Reply With Quote
  #10882  
Old 12-28-12, 21:05
sniper sniper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,238
Default

Funny also that there is nobody representating Sky at CCN.
May not be a coincidence though considering Ashenden's recent observation that sophisticated microdoping is widespread among the peloton's new age teams.

On that topic: has anybody at Sky made any official or unofficial statements wrt CCN? Something like "Way to go boys", "Keep up the good work guys", or a variation thereof?
Reply With Quote
  #10883  
Old 12-28-12, 21:15
Dear Wiggo's Avatar
Dear Wiggo Dear Wiggo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sunny Australia
Posts: 5,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryo Hazuki View Post
out of this world? how do you know? brajkovic is 12 kg lighter than froome and isn't much worse.
57kg? Where'd you get that figure?
__________________
Letters to and from the pro peloton. twitter | blog
Reply With Quote
  #10884  
Old 12-28-12, 21:17
Joachim Joachim is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 531
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sniper View Post
Funny also that there is nobody representating Sky at CCN.
May not be a coincidence though considering Ashenden's recent observation that sophisticated microdoping is widespread among the peloton's new age teams.
?
Garmin being the other new-age team, which is probably why Vaughters wasn't there either

Reply With Quote
  #10885  
Old 12-28-12, 21:18
Dear Wiggo's Avatar
Dear Wiggo Dear Wiggo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sunny Australia
Posts: 5,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sniper View Post
pro-doping:
6) They're McQuaid's best friends. Phat 'predicted' Wiggo's TdF victory long before they had reached Paris.
7) Wiggo not publishing his passport data
8) Wiggo refusing to take Kimmage on board during the TdF
and tenerife hasn't even been mentioned yet.

you've missed very important points against doping:
4) Because Vaughters says so
5) Because Millar says so
3b) Their performance compared to their previous performance.
__________________
Letters to and from the pro peloton. twitter | blog
Reply With Quote
  #10886  
Old 12-28-12, 21:28
sniper sniper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,238
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joachim View Post
Garmin being the other new-age team, which is probably why Vaughters wasn't there either

indeed, being DS of Garmin is Vaughters' only job. Couldn't think of another reason why he should be invited.
Reply With Quote
  #10887  
Old 12-28-12, 21:31
The Hitch's Avatar
The Hitch The Hitch is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: London.
Posts: 23,019
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sideshadow View Post
Is there a summary of points for/against SKY doping? There’s certainly no evidence but I’ll try to arrange from strong to weak points. I can think of the following, feel free to add.

For doping:
1) Dr. Geert Leinders and Dr. Fabio Bartalucci. We know the story, both dope doctors hired after SKY’s abysmal 2010 performance.
2) Their dismissal. If SKY had nothing to hide, why fire them AFTER they won the tour?
3) Their performance. This seems like a major point in some people’s arguments, it’s sad in a way that our sport has come to this, questioning performance. We all saw it, dominant in the mountains, dominant in the time trials. People say Wiggins never attacked like a doper, but certainly he didn’t need to. Froome TTing faster than Cancellara was weird for me.
4) Undedectable AICAR. No one can argue that SKY had the skinniest riders, personally I can’t think of any riders with lower BMI’s.
5) Team policy, more importantly changes of policy. Not hiring from outside UK, not hiring personnel with known doping past, certainly changed quickly.

Neither here nor there:
1) Froome’s ‘incurable’ bilharzia, making his blood passport useless. Praziquantel cures more than 85 percent of individuals, retreatment of patients with residual infections results in cure in more than 80 percent.
2) Wiggins’s behaviour also seems a big issue for some. Eg. Calling trolls the C word, ‘never raced against Armstrong’, trying to pay less taxes etc.

Against doping:
1) Everything else.
2) No evidence.
3) British riders don’t dope.
You dismiss people who ask questions as trolls?

So therefore isnt wiggins also a troll since he said this
Quote:
"unfortunately now the suspicion is out there that you can't win the Tour de France unless you're doing something. That's unfortunate if he is clean but at the same time you can't blame people for the doubt that's there"
Quote:
It's going to be difficult and you can't blame people for doubting the credibility of the Tour for perhaps the next 5,6,7 years
Why are we trolls for applying the same standards to wiggins that wiggins has no problem applying to anyone not named Bradley?
__________________
The Hitch: Winner 2013 Vuelta cq game. Winner, Velorooms prediction game 2012, 2013 (still undefeated). Currently 2nd all time cq rankings.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pre 2009 wiggins
If there's a 1% suspicion or doubt that a team is working with certain doctors, then they shouldn't be invited to the Tour de France - as simple as that.
journalist with integrity.
Reply With Quote
  #10888  
Old 12-28-12, 21:36
The Hitch's Avatar
The Hitch The Hitch is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: London.
Posts: 23,019
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sniper View Post
Funny also that there is nobody representating Sky at CCN.
May not be a coincidence though considering Ashenden's recent observation that sophisticated microdoping is widespread among the peloton's new age teams.

On that topic: has anybody at Sky made any official or unofficial statements wrt CCN? Something like "Way to go boys", "Keep up the good work guys", or a variation thereof?
If you believe Bailsford's propaganda he is likely to believe that CCN are wasting their time since Bailsford already won the battle against doping in July 2012 so they are fighting something that no longer exists.
__________________
The Hitch: Winner 2013 Vuelta cq game. Winner, Velorooms prediction game 2012, 2013 (still undefeated). Currently 2nd all time cq rankings.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pre 2009 wiggins
If there's a 1% suspicion or doubt that a team is working with certain doctors, then they shouldn't be invited to the Tour de France - as simple as that.
journalist with integrity.
Reply With Quote
  #10889  
Old 12-28-12, 22:25
BroDeal BroDeal is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Above 5000 feet
Posts: 12,937
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by martinvickers View Post
2009 7 days in the high mountains
The Tour where the Pyranees were essentially eliminated being used as evidence of how mountainous the current Tours are. LOL. That's a good one.
Reply With Quote
  #10890  
Old 12-28-12, 23:16
martinvickers martinvickers is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Ireland
Posts: 2,861
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroDeal View Post
The Tour where the Pyranees were essentially eliminated being used as evidence of how mountainous the current Tours are. LOL. That's a good one.
2 HC and 4 cat in three days in the pyranees, several MTFs and four hard alp days isn't exactly soft country...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:41.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2006 - 2009 Future Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Future Publishing Limited is part of the Future plc group. Future Publishing Limited is a company registered in England and Wales with company registration number 2008885 whose registered office is at Beauford Court 30 Monmouth Street Bath, UK BA1 2BW England.