Originally Posted by del1962
The only thing that Kimmage say's is relevent is Leinders, but then why not compeare with Rabbobank (less shocj value I guess).
Considering the court decision that would indeed have been the correct comparison.. and would show exactly the problem.
On a side note, the "he can never satisfy the wolves" nonsense is just nonsense.
PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH.
1. Wiggins should not have gone back on his word. He fully realizes the critics are 100% right in questioning him, so why cry about it? Be upfront and say that you understand our scepticism.
2. Be transparent. He realized years ago that that was the only way forward. So why the change?
3. The lies and cover ups about hiring Leinders are absolutely ridiculous.
Brailsford/Wiggins only can look at themselves about why people question them. They simply show they are not to be trusted on their word on exactly the biggest issue in Cycling right now. And that's worrisome.