2013 Santos Tour Down Under: 20th Jan - 27th Jan - Page 10 - Cyclingnews Forum

Go Back   Cyclingnews Forum > Road > Professional road racing

Professional road racing A place to discuss all things related to current professional road races. Here, you can also touch on the latest news relating to professional road racing. A doping discussion free forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 01-03-13, 06:50
calinmarian calinmarian is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 76
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferminal View Post
lol, that is pretty funny considering TDU stages are shorter than U23 races.
The Tour Down Under will be live in Europe or only in Australia?Anybody knows why the Eurosport won't show the TDU live on Europe?
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 01-03-13, 08:24
auscyclefan94's Avatar
auscyclefan94 auscyclefan94 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calinmarian View Post
The Tour Down Under will be live in Europe or only in Australia?Anybody knows why the Eurosport won't show the TDU live on Europe?
Don't worry, there will be live feeds on the net which will not be geo-restricted.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by diggercuz View Post
second post ever after reading the forum for the last few years and one thing i must say, ACF94 is probably the most intelligent poster here, never biased to BMC or Cadel, and never gets worked up over anything.
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 01-03-13, 09:21
theyoungest theyoungest is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PCutter View Post
Your wrong (often).

The focus on lab results isn't because Cadel has good numbers (but no surprise you place everything in the prism of how it compares to Cadel). Lab results in Australia and other countries (like the UK) are given prominence because so much of our junior development is based on developing track riders. This is because government funding is dependent on delivering Olympic success (as the government rightly doesn't fund the development of professional sports). There is thus a lot of data on these riders which is very useful for comparison of potential. For those with the outstanding testing results it can be a very good indicator, but of course, more than numbers makes a champion, so bad luck, injury, mental ability all come int to it when separating the talented to the talented with results.

I think given the achievements of Australian cycling over recent years (constantly ranked top 5ish on the World Tour with a regular stream of new talent) that there is significant evidence that what they do (checking the numbers) works. It is why the UK adopted a very similar structure, and is the reason why Italy has been studying the Australian Institute of Sport and Cycling Australia methodologies. Its also why when Richie Porte and Will Clarke were searching for WT teams that Bjarne Riis asked to see their numbers. Its not just text book theory. And has very little to do with 'what did Cadel do', though of course his numbers were fantastic. PS. Durbridge broke Cadels AIS record for ramps last year.
The "problem" is that track riders are usually good on ergometers. For instance, Rohan Dennis surprised Rabobank testers with his watts/kg (indicative of climbing talent) but then Jenning Huizenga put out the same numbers, he isn't a great climber by any stretch of the imagination. Whereas Bauke Mollema gets awful results in the lab, but no one is going to argue the guy can't climb.

I'm sure Bobridge and Meyer have great lab results, and on an ergometer they'll probably both outperform Alejandro Valverde, but who are you going to bet on to win Willunga? As you say, lab results do say something, but certainly not everything, with recovery probably the most important thing being ignored in them.

Last edited by theyoungest; 01-03-13 at 09:25.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 01-03-13, 09:41
swuzzlebubble's Avatar
swuzzlebubble swuzzlebubble is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 354
Default

Bobridge and Meyer probably better up say 5% for > 5km
__________________
"Vive la Révolution!"
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 01-03-13, 10:13
movingtarget movingtarget is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,294
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parrulo View Post
never understood why in some countries like australia lab results were given such importance.

we have never seen lab results from guys like contador, schleck, gilbert, Costa and Valverde and we knew all along from the young ranks they would almost certainly be top riders.
Interesting comment seeing as though Australia's best sports physiologists and coaches have been poached by other countries that are now getting much better results.
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 01-04-13, 01:39
mherm79 mherm79 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 242
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blaxland View Post
All the numbers in the world won't help Orica/Greenedge in Grand tours"Until they hire someone with decent GC credentials.Cam meyer may end up being a good week long stage racer but i can't see him doing any better than a top 20 GC result.Hope they prove me wrong?
My pick for TDU is N.Haas (Garmin)
Why does GreenEdge need a strong GC rider? They could focus on classics and stages in the way HTC did and the Belgiums normally do.
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 01-04-13, 02:50
blaxland blaxland is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,233
Default

To keep public interest up and thus more sponsorship dollars.Personally I would like to see someone from Australia competing at the top level in the biggest race on TV.(as we all know cadel is past his best)sorry ACF.They had a very good year this season and I hope that continues this year,but buy winning stages in two of the grand tours and winning a classic,the bar is set very,very high?
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 01-04-13, 03:05
Wilba60 Wilba60 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 337
Default

I think public interest is going along very well for the team without a GC rider at this point. For a fledgling team they are getting plenty of exposure with this style of racing, keep in mind that sometimes/often strong GC teams become a bit of a one trick pony and unless they are winning they can be boring to watch.

My feel for the average cycling fan here in Aust (not cycling purists) is that they normally barrack for an Aussie win or involvement to keep their interest. They are happy to support the OGE team and it's riders and then have other Aussie riders of interest to watch if the OGE boys aren't in the mix. With a race like TDF last year Aussies would flick across from a possible Goss win in a sprint stage to see how Cadel, Richie and Mick Rogers were doing in the mountains. In effect they may support OGE as the No. 1 team but have interests in Sky, Rabo and Garmin with their Aussie riders.
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 01-04-13, 03:37
mherm79 mherm79 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 242
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blaxland View Post
They had a very good year this season and I hope that continues this year,but buy winning stages in two of the grand tours and winning a classic,the bar is set very,very high?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilba60 View Post
I think public interest is going along very well for the team without a GC rider at this point. For a fledgling team they are getting plenty of exposure with this style of racing, keep in mind that sometimes/often strong GC teams become a bit of a one trick pony and unless they are winning they can be boring to watch.
I agree and think that they can continue to build on the sucess, hopefully despite the fact the Matt White isn't there.

I think another Monument is possible as well as a podium in a classic. Remember Goss did not have a good year, Bobridge was focusing on the track and Meyer and Durbridge continue to develop.

They've also added the young gun Caleb Ewan, who under Robbie McEwen's wing is likely contest the Green jersey in about 3-4years.

That should bring enough attention to satisfy fan's and sponsors alike.
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 01-04-13, 05:53
mickkk mickkk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 324
Default

The TDU seems to have suffered a form of breakdown, I think caused by its unwavering support of and association with lance Armstrong.

A lot of sponsors and people are gutted, the fall out tremendous. People just left burned.

Publicity in Australia has almost been zero this time around.

I think it has been knocked back a good 5 years in terms of development.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:02.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.