Originally Posted by sniper
I do appreciate it.
I was just rebutting Wallace and Gromit's suggestion that 'no story' equals 'no doping'.
You're correct that everything else is mere speculation.
You've got me the wrong way round: No doping means there's no story, not necessarily the other way round. (This is basic logic, not a statement of fact: IF then is no doping THEN then is no story.)
One can't infer anything in isolation from the fact there is no story (from Wendy) other than that there is either nothing to tell or those in the know don't want to tell it, which I'm sure we can all agree is both stating the bl**ding obvious and not particularly helpful!