The Sky-Con-O-Meter. Predictions on how much more ridiculous they can get - Page 100 - Cyclingnews Forum

Go Back   Cyclingnews Forum > Road > The Clinic

The Clinic The Clinic is the only place on Cyclingnews where you can discuss doping-related issues. Ask questions, discuss positives or improvements to procedures.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #991  
Old 01-27-13, 09:27
xcleigh xcleigh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 238
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandillusion View Post
The whole point of the proposed T&R process is to enable the UCIIC to forensically examine the accusations made in the USADA RD against the UCI.

So Brailsfords statement is totally disingenuous BS, pretending that the process is about getting at the truth about riders' doping. That is not the main point of this proposed process at all.

Transparent BS.
I thought the UCIIC was likely to be ditched if the T&R process was being put in place. Supposedly the UCI is strapped for cash so they can't have the both running concurrently. Brailsford seems concerned that the T&R process, should it proceed, will gather lots of information but they (the UCI) haven't worked out what the heck they'll do with the information. Poor planning. I think that is a valid concern, no? Or do we know what the final aim of the T&R process is and what is likely to be done with all the information gathered?
Reply With Quote
  #992  
Old 01-27-13, 09:33
Joachim Joachim is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 531
Default

What Brailsford is saying is what the hell is the point of letting 100 guys off their doping offences if nobody has worked out what the actual benefit is yet.

Only the tinfoil hatters of The Clinic forum could try and spin it into proof that Brailsford is trying to hide doping.

You guys ought to get into writing fantasy novels. Some of you are very talented at it.
Reply With Quote
  #993  
Old 01-27-13, 09:41
the asian's Avatar
the asian the asian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Colombo
Posts: 3,323
Default

The actual benefit is that the under the radar enablers like Leinders , Ibarguren and perhaps Bartalucci and the team managers will be exposed and could be banned from cycling.

OFC Brailsford won't want any of that.

He won't have any experienced doctors left to treat for saddle sores
Reply With Quote
  #994  
Old 01-27-13, 09:47
Bexon30's Avatar
Bexon30 Bexon30 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 394
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joachim View Post
What Brailsford is saying is what the hell is the point of letting 100 guys off their doping offences if nobody has worked out what the actual benefit is yet.

Only the tinfoil hatters of The Clinic forum could try and spin it into proof that Brailsford is trying to hide doping.

You guys ought to get into writing fantasy novels. Some of you are very talented at it.
Zzzzzz

Billy goat gruff has a troll in it.
Reply With Quote
  #995  
Old 01-27-13, 09:48
Joachim Joachim is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 531
Default

So who's sockpuppet are you?
Reply With Quote
  #996  
Old 01-27-13, 09:52
biker jk's Avatar
biker jk biker jk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 308
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joachim View Post
What Brailsford is saying is what the hell is the point of letting 100 guys off their doping offences if nobody has worked out what the actual benefit is yet.

Only the tinfoil hatters of The Clinic forum could try and spin it into proof that Brailsford is trying to hide doping.

You guys ought to get into writing fantasy novels. Some of you are very talented at it.
You must have worked as a spin doctor for Blair.
Reply With Quote
  #997  
Old 01-27-13, 09:57
Joachim Joachim is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 531
Default

Maybe I could have done if I was British and lived in the UK.
Reply With Quote
  #998  
Old 01-27-13, 11:25
Grandillusion Grandillusion is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 254
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xcleigh View Post
I thought the UCIIC was likely to be ditched if the T&R process was being put in place. Supposedly the UCI is strapped for cash so they can't have the both running concurrently. Brailsford seems concerned that the T&R process, should it proceed, will gather lots of information but they (the UCI) haven't worked out what the heck they'll do with the information. Poor planning. I think that is a valid concern, no? Or do we know what the final aim of the T&R process is and what is likely to be done with all the information gathered?
The Amnesty & T&R process was being insisted upon by WADA & USADA & CCN as a condition of their joining the UCIIC investigation.

This was obstructed and denied by the UCI until the last minute. The UCI's blocking and stalling tactics continue, the latest being their whinge about being too poor to continue. It's not the UCI who want the T&R amnesty, it's the UCIIC and the other parties, so the proper detailed forensic investigation can be enabled to proceed.

Brailsford knows this too, and is being disingenuous claiming that the reason for the amnesty is to investigate the riders. It's not, and he knows that.
Reply With Quote
  #999  
Old 01-27-13, 12:00
Dear Wiggo's Avatar
Dear Wiggo Dear Wiggo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sunny Australia
Posts: 5,567
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joachim View Post
What Brailsford is saying is what the hell is the point of letting 100 guys off their doping offences if nobody has worked out what the actual benefit is yet.

Only the tinfoil hatters of The Clinic forum could try and spin it into proof that Brailsford is trying to hide doping.

You guys ought to get into writing fantasy novels. Some of you are very talented at it.
Claims to know what Brailsford is thinking / meaning.

Denigrates other forum members.

Further denigrates other forum members.

Quality posting, keep it up.
__________________
Letters to and from the pro peloton. twitter | blog
Reply With Quote
  #1000  
Old 01-27-13, 12:06
Don't be late Pedro's Avatar
Don't be late Pedro Don't be late Pedro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,361
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dear Wiggo View Post
Claims to know what Brailsford is thinking / meaning.
Haha, and you have never claimed to know what others are thinking/meaning?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:01.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2006 - 2009 Future Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Future Publishing Limited is part of the Future plc group. Future Publishing Limited is a company registered in England and Wales with company registration number 2008885 whose registered office is at Beauford Court 30 Monmouth Street Bath, UK BA1 2BW England.