Disappointing article from Lennard Zinn on Specialized/Volagi - CyclingNews Forum

Go Back   CyclingNews Forum > Bikes & Gear > General

General Which tyres for Paris-Roubaix? Whose time trial bike is fastest? Suspension mountain bikes or singlespeeders? Talk equipment here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-10-12, 14:29
richwagmn richwagmn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,750
Default Disappointing article from Lennard Zinn on Specialized/Volagi

http://velonews.competitor.com/2012/...goliath_206046

Sounds like Specialized is a little hurt and has asked Lennard to help them out.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-10-12, 17:22
BroDeal's Avatar
BroDeal BroDeal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Above 5000 feet
Posts: 12,907
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richwagmn View Post
http://velonews.competitor.com/2012/...goliath_206046

Sounds like Specialized is a little hurt and has asked Lennard to help them out.
It sounds like Sinyard himself is hurt by the fallout. Many of his quotes are disingenuous. Some appear to be outright lies. He even tries to distance himself from the Apple and Jobs comparison by saying he was just using an analogy that the jury would understand. Reports from other sources say that Sinyard has long admired Jobs and considers himself the bicycle equivalent. He denies that there is a history of lawsuits when there is a long list of small companies that Specialized has roughed up.

That is the level of crap journalism that we have come to expect from Velonews. This is little more than a Specialized PR statement that tells just enough of Volagi's side of the story to allow the piece to masquerade as piece of fair journalism.

You do have to love how Sinyard says he was forced into suing. He didn't want to, but he was forced to do it. He proffers a rather ridiculous explanation that his employees had to know that he wold protect their work. Of course Zinn glosses over the fact that any claim that was even near the realm of supporting such an argument was thrown out of court. Zinn does not explore tthe obvious (and much more believable) flip side of Sinyard's line of reasoning, which is that the purpose was to intimidate his own employees so they will think twice about starting their own companies.

Then to wrap the article up, the hurting Sinyard say he would do it all over again. I bet. Sinyard ran smack into reality in the age of social media when there is blowback for his practice of sue first, ask whether it is legitimate later or maybe not at all.
__________________
"Listen, my son. Trust no one! You can count on no one but yourself. Improve your skills, son. Harden your body. Become a number one man. Do not ever let anyone beat you!" -- Gekitotsu! Satsujin ken
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-10-12, 18:57
Scott SoCal
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroDeal View Post
It sounds like Sinyard himself is hurt by the fallout. Many of his quotes are disingenuous. Some appear to be outright lies. He even tries to distance himself from the Apple and Jobs comparison by saying he was just using an analogy that the jury would understand. Reports from other sources say that Sinyard has long admired Jobs and considers himself the bicycle equivalent. He denies that there is a history of lawsuits when there is a long list of small companies that Specialized has roughed up.

That is the level of crap journalism that we have come to expect from Velonews. This is little more than a Specialized PR statement that tells just enough of Volagi's side of the story to allow the piece to masquerade as piece of fair journalism.

You do have to love how Sinyard says he was forced into suing. He didn't want to, but he was forced to do it. He proffers a rather ridiculous explanation that his employees had to know that he wold protect their work. Of course Zinn glosses over the fact that any claim that was even near the realm of supporting such an argument was thrown out of court. Zinn does not explore tthe obvious (and much more believable) flip side of Sinyard's line of reasoning, which is that the purpose was to intimidate his own employees so they will think twice about starting their own companies.

Then to wrap the article up, the hurting Sinyard say he would do it all over again. I bet. Sinyard ran smack into reality in the age of social media when there is blowback for his practice of sue first, ask whether it is legitimate later or maybe not at all.
All that and then there's Ben Delaney who now works for Specialized and until very recently was the editor at VN.... Zinn's former Boss... prolly called in a favor at VN for his new employer. Maybe got the new corner office or something.

Or it could all be a total coincidence.

Last edited by Scott SoCal; 02-10-12 at 18:59.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-10-12, 22:11
DirtyWorks's Avatar
DirtyWorks DirtyWorks is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 6,241
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroDeal View Post
That is the level of crap journalism that we have come to expect from Velonews.
The media property couldn't survive on its own, and this is the reason why. Their editorial choices are even worse now more than ever.

I can't see how the new owners are going to make VN profitable as they have clearly decided to produce content specifically for the benefit of their advertisers. It reminds me of an Amex travel/food magazine whose only reason for existence is as a branding/marketing exercise.
__________________
Tammy Thomas is writing a book about her cycling career and is asking for funding.

http://www.gofundme.com/a4mlho

https://twitter.com/FitnessLawyer

This is a good time for her to tell her story.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-12-12, 06:15
ustabe's Avatar
ustabe ustabe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 442
Default

In his article Zinn states he is just reporting Sinyard's side of the story. Because most of the questions he posed to Sinyard are rather superficial, and he lets Sinyard off with evasive answers to the hard ones, the story comes across as and advocacy piece for Specialized. Well, Sinyard's side of the story is just not very convincing.

That's what happens when you send a technical editor out to do a reporter's job.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:01.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2006 - 2009 Future Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Future Publishing Limited is part of the Future plc group. Future Publishing Limited is a company registered in England and Wales with company registration number 2008885 whose registered office is at Beauford Court 30 Monmouth Street Bath, UK BA1 2BW England.