Since there is no explanation - CyclingNews Forum

Go Back   CyclingNews Forum > Feedback > About the forum

About the forum Drop in, give us some feedback and talk to the team

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-20-12, 11:47
Barrus Barrus is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,446
Default Since there is no explanation

Since they have not giving any indication as to why this thread is under review, why it has been deleted or whatever. Here I go again, since it is important that this is out there:

Since the truth is out about that lying cheating son of a ***** Joe Papp and RR, it appears that I can come clean as to why I quit as a moderator/administrator over here. I have not been on here often and I have not posted on here for quite a while, but this new situation ensured that I felt compelled to post on here.

Please be clear, that I still don't know RR his true identity, nor do I care all that much about that

This issue happened quite a while back, so excuse me if I am not completely clear on the details anymore.

A while back it came to the attention of the CN staff that Joe Papp used a false method to get to know the identity of RR. He did so in order to get this information to LA and associates who had offered him money, or some manner of help in getting a lighter sentence for his doping related offences. My opinion in this case was that Joe Papp needed to be banned immediately and there needed to be some sort of insurance that such a situation would not occur again. I kept going after the real staff of the website in order to know where they would stand and what they would do. This answer did not come for several weeks, I found this so appalling and such a lack of respect for the owners/staff of the actual website towards the volunteer staff and the members of this forum that I issued an ultimatum, either the staff would give some sort of answer towards, at least, the staff or I was off the moderating team. Clearly they did not care.

Frankly I was not the only member of the moderation team that had issues with this decision, but I was the only person who was impulsive enough at the time to hang it up (others stayed around hoping to change stuff for the better, but later found out they were unable to do so)


RR himself did not want Joe Papp banned or that this knowledge would become widely available, due to the situation in which Papp found himself at that point in time. Still my opinion was that as soon as this knowledge was available to the staff that measures needed to be taken against Papp, even before speaking to RR.
After having consulted with RR the staff decided to do nothing and leave everything as is, without any guidance for what to do in the future. And frankly without any consultation of the people who ran the forum for them day in and day out. They did not seem to care about the privacy and the security of their members.

This is pretty much the cliff notes version of why I quit. I will keep up with this thread and answer any questions that might arise from this. But I think I will still be done with this forum entirely outside of this topic


ANother important aspect is the fact that there has been inactivity from the CN news staff, lack of communication that ensured a lot of friction between quite a few volunteer mods and staff





RR reply:
Quote:
Looks like the fixed the log in issue, something about a confirmation email that I did not receive

I do not have much time or energy to dwell on this as I am sitting in a cab driving into Chicago.

Yes, Papp reached out to me a few years back via PM's on this forum. He said he desperately needed my help. After a bunch of PM's we switched to emails. He would not tell me why he needed my help, just that he needed it badly. He said he not confide in me unless he knew my name, which I would not tell him.

Then, likely during a jeglagged haze, I accidently responded to him on my mobile using my personal email that had my name. Never heard from him again.

A few days later I heard from a few people he had sold my info to Herman. I then heard it from more people.....People I trust

I told the mods here about it but asked that nothing be done as I did not want to interfere with Joe's sentencing, the other investigation, or draw attention to it. I said we could revisit it when all that stuff was over

When "all that stuff was over" I asked that it be addressed. I heard nothing. I pushed again. Heard nothing. I finally reach out to Dan and he said he was not going to do anything and it was not open for discussion.

It is disturbing that someone could use the forum to do something like this. I never would have engaged with Joe if he had not sent me a PM here. Simple as that.
  #2  
Old 09-20-12, 11:56
cineteq's Avatar
cineteq cineteq is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 6,870
Default

Extreme measures?
__________________
Quote:
Do you want to watch better racing? Then power meters and team radios must be banned!
  #3  
Old 09-20-12, 12:08
Maxiton's Avatar
Maxiton Maxiton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,154
Default

It's pretty obvious: they want their lawyer to look it over, in order to see what legal exposure they have, if any. If he decides the exposure is little, the thread will come back, with maybe a few posts redacted, or maybe even untouched. If he decides it's too risky, the thread won't come back.

Keep in mind he'll be looking at it through the eyes of British law, not US law.
__________________
The UCI doping Helpline if calling from Great Britain: 00 800 8884 8884.
  #4  
Old 09-20-12, 12:09
JRTinMA's Avatar
JRTinMA JRTinMA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barrus View Post
Since they have not giving any indication as to why this thread is under review, why it has been deleted or whatever. <snip>
Not sure of your timezone or what you saw in the thread but Joe came in threatening legal action if the thread was not closed since he claimed is was libelous and CN was complicit. I suspect that is the reason.
__________________
Ripley on fixing Aliens and Cycling - "I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit, it's the only way to be sure" - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2s1MspmfEwg

Alberto Contador will win the 100th edition of the Tour de France.

Alberto Contador will win the 101th edition of the Tour de France.
  #5  
Old 09-20-12, 12:15
Daniel Benson's Avatar
Daniel Benson Daniel Benson is offline
Managing editor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bath, UK
Posts: 595
Send a message via Skype™ to Daniel Benson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxiton View Post
It's pretty obvious: they want their lawyer to look it over, in order to see what legal exposure they have, if any. If he decides the exposure is little, the thread will come back, with maybe a few posts redacted, or maybe even untouched. If he decides it's too risky, the thread won't come back.

Keep in mind he'll be looking at it through the eyes of British law, not US law.
Correct....
__________________
Managing Editor Cyclingnews.com
  #6  
Old 09-20-12, 12:26
hrotha's Avatar
hrotha hrotha is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 12,362
Default

This is pretty hilarious. Papp threatens legal action because... uh... yeah?
  #7  
Old 09-20-12, 12:45
Benotti69's Avatar
Benotti69 Benotti69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 12,448
Default

So a member issues threats and is not banned??????
__________________
"ahaha, ever had the feeling you been cheated?" JL SF Jan'78
  #8  
Old 09-20-12, 13:06
Maxiton's Avatar
Maxiton Maxiton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,154
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Benson View Post
Correct....
Doesn't it cost quite a lot of money to sue someone in the UK? Especially if you're in the US? You can't do it on hot air alone. So I wouldn't be too very worried about it.
__________________
The UCI doping Helpline if calling from Great Britain: 00 800 8884 8884.
  #9  
Old 09-20-12, 13:10
rickshaw's Avatar
rickshaw rickshaw is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 473
Default Thread has been "disappeared"

I caught this thread for the short time it was on the "Professional Cycling" forum. I thought it was in the wrong place but... left, came back, gone. No mention of being deleted, or moved, or anything, just disappeared. They'll probably "disappear" this one too.

FWIW: I lost any residual respect for Joe P when he started his anti Muslim hate thread. How can one trust someone who is known to be untrustworthy?
  #10  
Old 09-20-12, 13:14
blutto blutto is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 944
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxiton View Post
Doesn't it cost quite a lot of money to sue someone in the UK? Especially if you're in the US? You can't do it on hot air alone. So I wouldn't be too very worried about it.
...assuming of course that you are only dealing with a poor Papp living in his mom's basement....

Cheers

blutto
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:34.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2006 - 2009 Future Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Future Publishing Limited is part of the Future plc group. Future Publishing Limited is a company registered in England and Wales with company registration number 2008885 whose registered office is at Beauford Court 30 Monmouth Street Bath, UK BA1 2BW England.