BC and the Tour of Britain - Page 2 - Cyclingnews Forum

Go Back   Cyclingnews Forum > Road > Professional road racing

Professional road racing A place to discuss all things related to current professional road races. Here, you can also touch on the latest news relating to professional road racing. A doping discussion free forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-07-12, 20:11
martinvickers martinvickers is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Ireland
Posts: 2,861
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyWorks View Post
SweetSpot builds the event, then BC shops it out looking for a higher bidder. If that isn't classic short-sighted, small-time sports management the UCI does so well, then I don't know what is.

Martin, the tender process varies depending on the country. In the U.S. USAC posts tenders for national championships only. If you want to do an event that ends up on the UCI's world calendar, you deal with both the U.S. federation and Agile. In the U.S. it is extremely difficult to make the event business model work if you want to be on the UCI's global calendar. UCI's costs, on top of USA Cycling's costs are ridiculous for high-ranking competitive events. I'm pretty sure that is by design to concentrate money in the Elite peloton.

The UK may be under more and different standards because the sports are government funded. Could the event be profitable in the UK, or is it just considered a public good expense?

I predict World Cycling Productions for the win!
Cycling is in a unique place right now in Britain - Ireland had it's similar moments in the 80's, though not on the same scale because we are a much smaller country - to say Cycling is going mainstream is actually to undersell it, it's going stratospheric - the crowds at the Olympic roadraces were really quite extraordinary - as ridiculous as it sounds, Box hill would not have shamed the Alpe in terms of fervour that day - and the tour of Britain, small fry though it is, got fantastic crowds.

They are now trying to add a "london classic", to partly use the olympic course, to add a 'big' one day race to the existing tour in their knapsack. It would be a big weekend festival of cycling, including a 'women's classic' - which is frankly a great idea - and if Vox and Armitstead are in that, with cooke, houvenaghal, trott, garner, barker and some of the other girls (Sarah Storey, maybe), it could very well be one of the best attended women's races around.

As to profitable, not really sure; but just having more 'big' 'elite' events gives indirect ground to BD - see the success of the Revolution series. Profile indirectly equals sponsor money anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-07-12, 23:22
MartinGT's Avatar
MartinGT MartinGT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 1,459
Default

BC Do close to knack all for the domestic RR scene. Our Premier Calender is shrinking by the minute its disgusting truly is.

Its also a **** take to see how serious Team Sky took (or didnt as was the case) this year ToB.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-07-12, 23:34
DirtyWorks's Avatar
DirtyWorks DirtyWorks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 6,813
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MartinGT View Post
BC Do close to knack all for the domestic RR scene. Our Premier Calender is shrinking by the minute its disgusting truly is.
You are missing the point of the UCI's efforts. The UCI is not interested in having widespread participation racing. They are interested in producing/selling cycling shows. They only need a small pool of actors for that and they have enough.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-08-12, 08:49
JimmyFingers's Avatar
JimmyFingers JimmyFingers is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,857
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MartinGT View Post
BC Do close to knack all for the domestic RR scene. Our Premier Calender is shrinking by the minute its disgusting truly is.

Its also a **** take to see how serious Team Sky took (or didnt as was the case) this year ToB.
Cav took some stages didn't he? I think they wanted Rowe to go for the overall. It was always going to be a bit of a victory lap for Wiggins
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-08-12, 15:23
uphillstruggle uphillstruggle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 535
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MartinGT View Post
BC Do close to knack all for the domestic RR scene. Our Premier Calender is shrinking by the minute its disgusting truly is.
Definitely agree with you there. They just take our license fees every year and use it to fund the track squad (well I really have no idea what they do with it but it isn't funding or assisting with grass roots racing). The racing scene over here is basically run on the work of local clubs and enthusiasts.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:01.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2006 - 2009 Future Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Future Publishing Limited is part of the Future plc group. Future Publishing Limited is a company registered in England and Wales with company registration number 2008885 whose registered office is at Beauford Court 30 Monmouth Street Bath, UK BA1 2BW England.