At what point does placing in a GT become irrelevant? - Cyclingnews Forum

Go Back   Cyclingnews Forum > Road > Professional road racing

Professional road racing A place to discuss all things related to current professional road races. Here, you can also touch on the latest news relating to professional road racing. A doping discussion free forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-06-13, 03:33
Krebs cycle Krebs cycle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 770
Default At what point does placing in a GT become irrelevant?

I realize there is no black and white answer because it depends on team strategy, but I'm interested to know people's thoughts on using placing in a GT as a measure of overall cycling performance.

Roughly whereabouts do you think we see riders going for as best position as they can on GC, start to trail off in favor of riders whose goals and responsibilities are different eg: loose time on purpose on some stages so they can get in a breakaway later on and win an individual stage, domestiques who destroy themselves for the team one day in the mtns and recover the next, TT'ist whose goal is to win the ITT etc

Top 20?
Top 30?
Top 50?
Top 100?

The question thus becomes, is it fair to compare the performances of a rider who came 70th in a GT one year, and 10th the following year if their team role has changed? Was it a true measure of performance capability when they came 70th if say, they were a domestique that year and a GC rider the next (perhaps because they changed teams or the GC rider retired or was sick or injured or whatever)??

edit: Another way to frame this question is to ask... at what point roughly (ie: placing on GC) does it become more prestigious to win an individual stage of a GT rather than always compete for the best possible GC place??

Last edited by Krebs cycle; 02-06-13 at 03:36.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-06-13, 03:44
ElChingon's Avatar
ElChingon ElChingon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: En el Internet, and Hiding from the UCI
Posts: 5,834
Default

> 3rd Place.
__________________
CyclingNews Forum Member Number 1. (verified)
All my posts are of my own opinion.
October 10, 2012 The Reasoned Decision
Points: 10 CN Infraction Points
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-06-13, 03:56
Ferminal Ferminal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 16,484
Default

Some people make the top30 by trying very hard, say Rolland when he was just another French talent who wasn't going to be. Others like Valverde last year had the legs to finish far higher but didn't go for it. Cancellara could top30 a GT but never tries to. There's no blanket rule you can apply. Final GC time can get quite misleading after the top3-5 as everyone has good/bad days and there are sometimes domestiques mixed in, often those around top10-20 get their time in big breaks. Have to decompose into individual performances and then reconstruct based on what ifs.

re: individual stage, I'd say it depends on the stage and the rider. LLS winning from an average break may satisfy him, but for Valverde only an epic mountain ride is recompense for the overall sacrifice.

Last edited by Ferminal; 02-06-13 at 04:00.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-06-13, 04:03
hfer07's Avatar
hfer07 hfer07 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,189
Default

i'd say from top 5 down is meaningless- BUT - if a youngster makes a breakthrough performance & gets top 10-then is good.
__________________
Can you imagine what I would do if I could do all I can?
Sun Tzu
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-06-13, 04:17
Timmy-loves-Rabo's Avatar
Timmy-loves-Rabo Timmy-loves-Rabo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 10,379
Default

soley depends on the rider.
For example who didn't enjoy Hoogerland's 12th place at the vuelta in 09?

However more or less after top 10 is a little meh and again it depends on the rider. I'd argue a podium place is almost irrelevant for someone like contador
__________________
RIP Craig, you'll be missed friend.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-06-13, 04:53
42x16ss's Avatar
42x16ss 42x16ss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Perth, Aus
Posts: 2,721
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Timmy-loves-Rabo View Post
soley depends on the rider.
For example who didn't enjoy Hoogerland's 12th place at the vuelta in 09?

However more or less after top 10 is a little meh and again it depends on the rider. I'd argue a podium place is almost irrelevant for someone like contador
Yep, all depends on the rider really. If a neo pro comes top 15-20 in their first GT you tend to notice, if a rider who was only a domestique does the same thing you'd pay attention too.

It also depends on how it's done as well. Take VDB in the '99 Vuelta. He "only" came 12th but won two stages and the points jersey with panache despite being a hilly classics rider.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-06-13, 05:24
Krebs cycle Krebs cycle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 770
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Timmy-loves-Rabo View Post
soley depends on the rider.
For example who didn't enjoy Hoogerland's 12th place at the vuelta in 09?

However more or less after top 10 is a little meh and again it depends on the rider. I'd argue a podium place is almost irrelevant for someone like contador
Good answers. The type of rider and where they are in their career are obviously important. Lets take Valverde for example. He is capable of winning a GT, so was his 20th place in the tour last year relevant from from a performance perspective? Would you look at that performance and say he performed really badly because he was chasing GC and "only" came 20th, or would you say, that placing is largely irrelevant (ie: does not reflect his true performance potential) because once he was out of contention for the podium or top 5 place he no probably no longer chased a high GC finish?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-06-13, 05:41
auscyclefan94's Avatar
auscyclefan94 auscyclefan94 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,882
Default

It is circumstantial on the race. They also have to repeat the result again to consider a GT placing as a sign of being quality.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by diggercuz View Post
second post ever after reading the forum for the last few years and one thing i must say, ACF94 is probably the most intelligent poster here, never biased to BMC or Cadel, and never gets worked up over anything.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-06-13, 05:51
Afrank's Avatar
Afrank Afrank is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 8,822
Default

Pretty much agree with Timmy, different riders have different goals and aspirations. A young rider might just enter a grand tour and be happy to just finish it, while a GC contender might enter to get a high GC placing, in which case whether their performance was considered a success or not would be dependent on that placing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Krebs cycle View Post
Good answers. The type of rider and where they are in their career are obviously important. Lets take Valverde for example. He is capable of winning a GT, so was his 20th place in the tour last year relevant from from a performance perspective? Would you look at that performance and say he performed really badly because he was chasing GC and "only" came 20th, or would you say, that placing is largely irrelevant (ie: does not reflect his true performance potential) because once he was out of contention for the podium or top 5 place he no probably no longer chased a high GC finish?
I'd say in Valverde's case his GC position was irrelevant. He was just coming back to racing after his ban, he needed to simply ride a grand tour and get that racing in his legs before being able to contend for a high GC placing. And he did crash in Metz as well, so after that I doubt GC was too much of a concern for him. Plus he showed in the Vuelta (which was a harder route and better competition) that he still had the potential to get a high GC place.
__________________
Be the Goat

Fabio Aru: "si muore sulla bici"
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-06-13, 07:41
Dazed and Confused Dazed and Confused is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 9,160
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hfer07 View Post
i'd say from top 5 down is meaningless- BUT - if a youngster makes a breakthrough performance & gets top 10-then is good.
agree, but placement riders can even belittle the battle for 2-5 sometimes.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:27.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2006 - 2009 Future Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Future Publishing Limited is part of the Future plc group. Future Publishing Limited is a company registered in England and Wales with company registration number 2008885 whose registered office is at Beauford Court 30 Monmouth Street Bath, UK BA1 2BW England.