An open letter to UCI President Pat McQuaid.. - Cyclingnews Forum

Go Back   Cyclingnews Forum > Road > The Clinic

The Clinic The Clinic is the only place on Cyclingnews where you can discuss doping-related issues. Ask questions, discuss positives or improvements to procedures.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-25-10, 17:16
Dr. Maserati Dr. Maserati is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 11,035
Default An open letter to UCI President Pat McQuaid..

Dear Pat,

As the cycling community is quite small I have had the opportunity to meet with you over the years. I always admired your enthusiasm for the sport and your extensive knowledge of the sport in general.

Since the revelations made this week by Floyd Landis the sport of cycling and the UCI of which you are President has come under immense scrutiny. The accusations that a positive drug test by Lance Armstrong was ignored in return for a financial settlement is deeply disturbing and a serious charge against the UCI.

In a radio interview on Friday you mentioned that Lance Armstrong had ‘donated’ $100,000 in 2005. You repeated those comments again today at the Giro d'Italia.

It seriously harms the reputation of this great sport that there still remains major discrepancies in your version of events.

At the Play The Game conference in October 2007 you said the $100,000 ‘cash’ came in to our account "in actual fact, about 15 months ago". (Audio here- second clip)
This would be approximately July 2006 - which contradicts todays statements.

More alarmingly - July 2006 is only one month after the publication of the Vrijman report which cleared Mr Armstrong of facing sanction for having EPO in 6 urine samples that were retested in 2005.

With so many discrepancies I believe it is prudent that the UCI subject itself to a full independent financial audit.
I realise that this is a costly and time consuming process but it is one that the UCI must bare if it is to restore its faith in its members and the sporting community.

In a seperate interview today former UCI member Sylvia Schenk said "the UCI was always very proud of its accounts".
This should mean that the UCI should be able to immediately release details of the transaction, UCI booking and machine purchased, before an audit gets underway.

I also believe that you need to consider your position at this point.
In the interest of the sport of cycling, I respectfully suggest you stand down or stand aside while any investigation takes place – as I believe it would effect your ability to carry out the day to day duties of President.

If you feel that you should not stand down or stand aside then it is imperative that you clearly articulate the reasons for not doing so.

It is time to move along and begin the process of rebuilding the trust and credibility of this great sport.

Last edited by Daniel Benson; 05-26-10 at 08:59.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-25-10, 17:26
montel montel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 42
Default

Very nice ideas, with a great suggestion for Mr. McQuaid to step down. However, I don't think he will do as you suggest.

We need an independent drug testing system, and we need a new UCI president, not to mention better IOC members.

I say we draft Greg LeMond to be UCI president (not that he would do it!).
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-25-10, 17:29
thehog's Avatar
thehog thehog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 14,592
Default

3 You have made a -- a contribution or donation to the

4 UCI, have you not?

5 A. I have, yeah.

6 Q. Do you know when that was made?

7 A. Some years ago. I don't recall exactly.

8 Q. Well, 2000, for example?

9 A. I don't know.

10 Q. Was it -- was there anything that occasioned

11 that, that you recall? Like I'm doing it because of X

12 or Y or Z?

13 A. I'm doing it to -- to fund the fight against

14 doping.

15 Q. And what -- what made you -- what triggered

16 that? I mean, was there any particular event?

17 A. The only event, or the only idea is that I'm

18 in support of that fight, just like I've done on other

19 occasions.

20 Q. Why UCI? I mean, why give the money to UCI?

21 A. Because they're our governing body.

22 Q. Okay. How much did you give?

23 A. I think 25,000.

24 Q. You say you think. Do you --

25 A. Yeah, I say I think because I'm not 100


97



1 percent sure.

2 Q. Would it be within a range of that, though,

3 if you're -- I mean, it wouldn't be like --

4 A. Well, it wouldn't be --

5 Q. -- 200,000 --

6 A. No.

7 Q. -- or 150,000?

8 A. No.

9 Q. I mean, it could be 30 or 40, or it could be

10 20, is what I'm asking.

11 A. It could be. I don't think it's that. But

12 I think it's no more than 30.

13 Q. Was it by personal check?

14 A. I don't remember.

15 Q. Did you tell UCI you were going to make it

16 before you did?

17 A. I don't recall, but I don't think so. I

18 don't know.

19 Q. You gave $25,000, or approximately $25,000

20 to the UCI, but you don't remember if you told them

21 beforehand that you were sending them a check?

22 A. I don't recall.

23 Q. Had you ever given any money to UCI before?

24 A. No.

25 Q. Have you ever given any money since?


98



1 A. I have pledged money since, but I don't

2 think I've done it yet.

3 Q. When did you pledge money?

4 A. I don't remember. Between now and then.

5 Q. No. I meant when did you make the pledge?

6 A. Between now and then. I don't recall

7 exactly.

8 Q. Well --

9 MR. HERMAN: Between now and then,

10 meaning between the time you gave them the 25,000 --

11 THE WITNESS: Right.

12 MR. HERMAN: -- and now?

13 Q. (BY MR. TILLOTSON) Oh, okay. Between

14 now -- now and then, which I guess would be tomorrow.

15 Okay. So some --

16 A. It's still a fight I believe in --

17 Q. Okay. I'm not --

18 A. -- so I would still make the donation.

19 Q. I'm not attacking your -- the fight. I'm

20 asking you --

21 A. And if you have a different suggestion on

22 where to donate the money.

23 Q. Is there any other organization that -- that

24 is involved in anti-doping?

25 A. Well, you have a lot of organizations, WADA,


99



1 USADA, USOC, USA Cycling. You could pick all of

2 those.

3 Q. So there were other -- I mean, there --

4 there are at least other organizations you could have

5 picked.

6 A. Yeah.

7 Q. Okay. Do you know what UCI did with the

8 money?

9 A. I don't know.

10 Q. Who did you give the money to?

11 A. Well, if you sent a check or a wire, I don't

12 know who received it, but...

13 Q. I mean, like -- is it literally like one day

14 the UCI guy comes in, opens up the mail, and there's a

15 check from you for $25,000?

16 A. I mean, I don't know. I wasn't in the mail

17 room.

18 Q. Okay. But did you let anyone know this is

19 coming?

20 A. I told you, I don't remember.

21 Q. Okay. Have you spoken to anyone at UCI

22 regarding your donation?

23 A. Yeah.

24 Q. Who?

25 A. I have spoken to Alain Rumpf, Hein


100



1 Verbruggen, perhaps others.

2 Q. Do you know what they've done with the

3 money?

4 A. I just told you, I don't know.

5 Q. Okay. Like they didn't buy some specific

6 equipment or something with it that you're aware of?

7 It wasn't earmarked --

8 A. Which part of I don't know do you not

9 understand?

10 Q. So you have no idea why you gave $25,000 to

11 UCI at all. And you don't even know if you called

12 anyone before --

13 A. I don't know.

14 Q. Let me finish my question.

15 MR. HERMAN: Hang on. Hang on a

16 second. Finish your question, if it is a question.

17 Q. (BY MR. TILLOTSON) You have no idea who you

18 called, and just -- you just sent a check for $25,000

19 to the UCI. You can't remember why you did it, or who

20 you talked to, or what it was for.

21 A. You asked me again what have they done with

22 the money, and I said I don't know.

23 Q. Okay. But you've spoken to two people.

24 Have they discussed with you what they plan on doing

25 with the funds in any way, or what they hope to do


101



1 with the funds?

2 A. Not that I recall.

3 Q. When did you -- did you ever tell the public

4 that you had made that donation?

5 A. Hein Verbruggen told them at some point, and

6 I confirmed that.

7 Q. Was there a reason why you didn't publicly

8 announce your donation to UCI?

9 A. The same reason that I don't -- my fight

10 against doping is not a public fight. So the same

11 reason that before the 2003 Tour de France, which was

12 fairly well publicized, I sent a private email to

13 Mr. Verbruggen, Mr. Schattenberg, Mr. LeBlanc, Daniel

14 Baal, everybody involved in the Tour and cycling, and

15 said, we have to keep up this fight, which then became

16 public, a public email after Daniel Baal put it in his

17 book.

18 Personally -- now, this is going --

19 this is going to shock you, but my style is different

20 than David Walsh's. My approach has been more of an

21 internal one, to support clean racing, to support

22 clean sport. My idea of the best tactic is not to

23 slander and defame everybody, and bite the hand that

24 feeds you, and **** in the soup; but my fight and my

25 commitment has always been there.


102



1 Q. Were you concerned at all when you made your

2 contribution to the UCI that other cyclists or members

3 of the cycling public might take it the wrong way?

4 A. No.

5 Q. Are you aware of any other professional

6 cyclists who's given money to UCI?

7 A. I don't know. I'm not aware. Personally, I

8 think there should be -- I think everybody should

9 contribute to the fund.

10 Q. How does UCI get its money? Do you know?

11 A. I have no idea.

12 Q. Okay.

13 A. Honestly, I don't know.

14 Q. That part of "I don't know" I understood.

15 Believe me.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-25-10, 17:31
Steampunk's Avatar
Steampunk Steampunk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Subpoenaed in Texas, Sequestered in Memphis
Posts: 221
Default

Well put.

The less tactful part of me would also add: In what universe are donations from a current or recent competitor ever a good idea? Frankly, this is the kind of activity that brings governments down.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-25-10, 17:34
Dr. Maserati Dr. Maserati is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 11,035
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by montel View Post
Very nice ideas, with a great suggestion for Mr. McQuaid to step down. However, I don't think he will do as you suggest.

We need an independent drug testing system, and we need a new UCI president, not to mention better IOC members.

I say we draft Greg LeMond to be UCI president (not that he would do it!).
I don't think Greg would get elected as the UCI is a democracy - if Hein likes you he flies you around the world endorses you candidacy and then you win.

You do realize that Mr McQuaid also holds a position on the IOC? Which is strange as he is banned from ever competing in the Olympics.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-25-10, 17:37
User Guide's Avatar
User Guide User Guide is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: not there,here
Posts: 701
Default show us the money

Verbiggen says $25,000
Armstrong says under $30,000
Mcquaid says $100,000
Sylvia Slenk says $500,000

I wish i had so much money i couldnt tell the difference between donating/receiving $25k,$100k and $500k..unless they all having incredibly bad accountants
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-25-10, 17:42
ruamruam's Avatar
ruamruam ruamruam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Ireland
Posts: 282
Send a message via AIM to ruamruam
Default

Sean Kelly and McQuaid went incognito to South Africa during the apartheid era and raced under assumed names. South Africa was quite rightly banned from the olympics because of it's racist policies
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-25-10, 17:55
Dr. Maserati Dr. Maserati is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 11,035
Default

@ Hog - great post. Also from the same SCA case here is what Bill Stapelton said:

He -- yes, he gave a donation
to the UCI three or four years
ago. I think he's done that
maybe once or twice, with a -
- with a request to refine the --
I believe -- we'd need to look
at the letter, but I believe it
was to further do research
into the EPO test.
Bill Stapelton - Armstrongs Manager & Lawyer
Sworn deposition - September 2005
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-25-10, 17:56
Ninety5rpm's Avatar
Ninety5rpm Ninety5rpm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The World
Posts: 1,806
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thehog View Post
3 You have made a -- a contribution...

15 Believe me.
Is there a link to this?

Last edited by Alpe d'Huez; 05-25-10 at 19:52. Reason: Brevity
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-25-10, 18:03
Moose McKnuckles's Avatar
Moose McKnuckles Moose McKnuckles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,631
Default

Mr. McQuaid, this gentleman would like a few moments of your time. As soon as he's finished with Armstrong.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:10.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2006 - 2009 Future Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Future Publishing Limited is part of the Future plc group. Future Publishing Limited is a company registered in England and Wales with company registration number 2008885 whose registered office is at Beauford Court 30 Monmouth Street Bath, UK BA1 2BW England.