Looks are exemplary of ability to procreate? "Looks"? As one generic universal look? I think you've cleared the bar set by many on both sides (but mostly the defenders) in terms of cliched, naturalized and ahistorical absurdity. Cosumption of images as tantamount to fantasy and the propensity to aggression was moderately inspired as well.
Maybe the posters whose only skin in the game is oldish, white, and mostly married might want to consult with contemporary times? Rightly or wrongly, at least to confirm that there are more developed positions.
Never mind the blatant sexism that follows. In the contemporary world there are more (let's not say many) women of power who are interested in men of "good breeding genes" and other more unconventional qualities because those women can breed and earn on their own terms. And are often highly accomplished at mostly non-gendered levels. That doesn't make them immune to the exponentially increased monetisation, philosophical polemics, multiple economies and multiple impositions that might be said to constitute or override their own sexual subjectivity.
Last edited by aphronesis
on 01 Jun 2016 05:33, edited 2 times in total.