Log in:  

Register

Durability of carbon frames: success stories

Which tyres for Paris-Roubaix? Whose time trial bike is fastest? Suspension mountain bikes or singlespeeders? Talk equipment here.

Moderator: Pricey_sky

Durability of carbon frames: success stories

03 Jan 2013 11:35

Even though my own experience with the material doesn't invite to optimism, somehow I believe that discussions on carbon frame durability are biased towards failures, be it by crashes or by defects in origin. Today many frames more than a decade old must be on the roads, and I would like to hear from people who have logged thousands of miles with them without problems. I think it could be interesting to know nice stories about long-lived carbon frames, wouldn't it? Or there isn't any? :rolleyes:
oronet commander
Junior Member
 
Posts: 103
Joined: 15 Mar 2009 08:10

03 Jan 2013 16:34

I have no doubt there's plenty of long-lived carbon being ridden.

Technically, straight by the numbers, the lifecycle of carbon is much longer than alloys. No contest. The problem being carbon is not multi-factor/multi-purpose like alloys. And when it fails, KAPOW! Worse still, it can and does affect casual riders.

That said, plenty of expensive alloy frames where the assembler pushed the limits of the material to failure. It doesn't tend to affect casual riders though. There aren't as many alloy frames sold any more since the carbon honeymoon is in full-swing, so definitely not as many stories retold.

There's so much misinformation out there! The sell-side of the industry is famous for pushing all kinds of misinformation to get people to consume more. I've even heard the old B.S. applied to carbon frames "going soft" after some years to sell more equipment.
User avatar DirtyWorks
Veteran
 
Posts: 8,095
Joined: 10 Feb 2010 17:01

03 Jan 2013 18:00

1999 Look KG 281: I still ride it, yes its the beater bike and at one point was considering selling it because of the supposed softening/failure stories but a new set of wheels put that to rest in one ride with those wheels. Miles/K's? A lot, ~20K, crashed a couple times, bent the hanger back, some paint chips but still intact.

2009 Ciocc Blade: Not as old as the Look, nor as many miles but still the primary bike and feels like day one.
CyclingNews Forum Member Number 1. (verified)
All my posts are of my own opinion.
October 10, 2012 The Reasoned Decision
Points: 10 CN Infraction Points
User avatar ElChingon
Veteran
 
Posts: 5,918
Joined: 10 Mar 2009 03:19
Location: En el Internet, and Hiding from the UCI

03 Jan 2013 23:03

All the carbon frames I have owned/own are still going today. I've broken a steel frame, had a lug peel away on another, and have had cracked welds at the bottom bracket on two Specialized frames (M2 and M4). I have owned steel and Alu bikes that haven't broken, but carbon is batting 1000 compared to the metallics in my lifetime.
twothirds
Junior Member
 
Posts: 274
Joined: 30 Sep 2009 12:16
Location: YEG

03 Jan 2013 23:45

I have 2 carbon bikes. One is around 10 years old and wears the fenders. The other is a 2007 and was raced by a Pro for the season before I bought it.
My wife had a 1998 Lemond that we replaced for a warranty issue that should have been caught in the shop. It was a flaw in the rear brake bridge during the moulding process. It was never a safety issue and had I not replaced her rear brake calliper I think she would still be riding it.

The only carbon parts i ever had problems with are campy Record bottle cages. The bottom stop eventually breaks and bottles slide through the cages. Arundle rules for hold. Cateye plastic cages are lighter than most Carbon cages and hold too well. They only cost $12.00 or less and you can even step on them without a breakage. Way too practical.
User avatar Master50
Member
 
Posts: 1,165
Joined: 10 Mar 2009 13:52
Location: Vancouver Island

04 Jan 2013 00:12

twothirds wrote:All the carbon frames I have owned/own are still going today. I've broken a steel frame, had a lug peel away on another, and have had cracked welds at the bottom bracket on two Specialized frames (M2 and M4). I have owned steel and Alu bikes that haven't broken, but carbon is batting 1000 compared to the metallics in my lifetime.


Didn't all those M2s eventually break? Sorta like Yeti FROs.
"Listen, my son. Trust no one! You can count on no one but yourself. Improve your skills, son. Harden your body. Become a number one man. Do not ever let anyone beat you!" -- Gekitotsu! Satsujin ken
User avatar BroDeal
Veteran
 
Posts: 13,318
Joined: 18 Mar 2009 00:41
Location: Above 5000 feet

04 Jan 2013 00:14

I've ridden over 6,000 miles on my main carbon racing bike since getting it last year. I've crashed on it 3 times, in the worst one breaking half the spokes on my front wheel. And so far the frame is still in great condition and still works great. BMC makes a durable bike. :)
User avatar Afrank
Veteran
 
Posts: 9,595
Joined: 16 Aug 2011 21:58
Location: Oregon

04 Jan 2013 00:19

2002 Trek 5200 with 26k miles. No problems
User avatar Kimono
New Member
 
Posts: 37
Joined: 26 Jun 2009 15:34

04 Jan 2013 00:21

I put almost 11,000 miles on my 2012 BMC Team Machine since I got it last March. I would still be riding it, but took a bad spill on Christmas eve. :( I broke my left hip, requiring a complete hip replacement. The BMC is waiting...
marathon marke
Junior Member
 
Posts: 218
Joined: 04 May 2010 00:45
Location: Wisconsin, USA

04 Jan 2013 01:00

DirtyWorks wrote:I have no doubt there's plenty of long-lived carbon being ridden.

Technically, straight by the numbers, the lifecycle of carbon is much longer than alloys. No contest. The problem being carbon is not multi-factor/multi-purpose like alloys. And when it fails, KAPOW! Worse still, it can and does affect casual riders.

That said, plenty of expensive alloy frames where the assembler pushed the limits of the material to failure. It doesn't tend to affect casual riders though. There aren't as many alloy frames sold any more since the carbon honeymoon is in full-swing, so definitely not as many stories retold.

There's so much misinformation out there! The sell-side of the industry is famous for pushing all kinds of misinformation to get people to consume more. I've even heard the old B.S. applied to carbon frames "going soft" after some years to sell more equipment.


The lifecycle if carbon may be longer than alloys but it is the resin that is the weak link.
simo1733
Member
 
Posts: 1,179
Joined: 15 Jun 2010 08:40
Location: Brunei

04 Jan 2013 01:16

simo1733 wrote:The lifecycle if carbon may be longer than alloys but it is the resin that is the weak link.

My 2007 Cannondale System Six is still going very strong. If anything, the alloy sections in the back are looking worse than the carbon front end. It still feels and rides great though. Best crit bike I've ever owned.
How to ride like a Tour champion!

proof noun (SHOWING TRUTH)

B2 [C or U] a fact or piece of information that shows that something exists or is true

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dict...ritish/proof_1


evidence noun [U] uk /ˈev.ɪ.dəns/ us

B2 one or more reasons for believing that something is or is not true

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dict...itish/evidence
User avatar 42x16ss
Veteran
 
Posts: 6,124
Joined: 23 May 2009 04:43
Location: Brisbane, Aus

04 Jan 2013 02:29

simo1733 wrote:The lifecycle if carbon may be longer than alloys but it is the resin that is the weak link.

Since no carbon product can be separate from the resins I think that the separation of the resin from the fabric is accounted for in breakage stats. So what do you mean for us to take into account? There is no indication that resins are failing where the fibre has not?
If there was ever a weak link in CF bikes it was the engineering. CF is not a material made for iterative engineering. Build a frame and see where it breaks. Make it stronger and see where it breaks now, etc. Many things are made better this way but a lot of early CF products revealed their design deficiencies in abrupt ways.:)
User avatar Master50
Member
 
Posts: 1,165
Joined: 10 Mar 2009 13:52
Location: Vancouver Island

04 Jan 2013 02:54

Ten years from now I'll let you know how my Madone 5 is holding up.

My 2007 Giant TCR C0 was great for a couple seasons, and then got really saggy and creaky. I've spoken with a few riders who've had similar experiences with TCRs of that era. I'm told that the problem is micro-gaps between the lay-ups that open up with flexing. Higher compression techniques in forming fork crowns, head tubes, seat clusters, and bottom brackets is supposed to alleviate this.
User avatar ustabe
Member
 
Posts: 469
Joined: 13 Jan 2010 15:24

04 Jan 2013 04:02

ustabe wrote:Ten years from now I'll let you know how my Madone 5 is holding up.

My 2007 Giant TCR C0 was great for a couple seasons, and then got really saggy and creaky. I've spoken with a few riders who've had similar experiences with TCRs of that era. I'm told that the problem is micro-gaps between the lay-ups that open up with flexing. Higher compression techniques in forming fork crowns, head tubes, seat clusters, and bottom brackets is supposed to alleviate this.

I had a 2006 TCR C1 for just over a year and traded it in for my System 6. The difference in stiffness was huge to say the least.

Since then Giant has really stepped up in terms of frame stiffness and finish quality though.
How to ride like a Tour champion!

proof noun (SHOWING TRUTH)

B2 [C or U] a fact or piece of information that shows that something exists or is true

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dict...ritish/proof_1


evidence noun [U] uk /ˈev.ɪ.dəns/ us

B2 one or more reasons for believing that something is or is not true

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dict...itish/evidence
User avatar 42x16ss
Veteran
 
Posts: 6,124
Joined: 23 May 2009 04:43
Location: Brisbane, Aus

04 Jan 2013 04:42

42x16ss wrote:I had a 2006 TCR C1 for just over a year and traded it in for my System 6. The difference in stiffness was huge to say the least.

Since then Giant has really stepped up in terms of frame stiffness and finish quality though.


I have 2006 TCR composite.I haven't had any problem with it but was considering getting a new frame anyway.
I had thought that I may not notice much improvement with a new frame, but what you guy's have said has got me thinking.
simo1733
Member
 
Posts: 1,179
Joined: 15 Jun 2010 08:40
Location: Brunei

04 Jan 2013 07:50

Great info here, guys, thanks. When I mentioned my not very optimistic experience with carbon I meant my 2004 Pinarello Prince SL: after 22,000 miles the fork was rigid but creaky. That made me very nervous, and when carefully checking the frame the left carbon stay cracked easily when pressed hard to verify deflection. Now I ride a Look 585 Ultra, which after 9,000 miles remains solid but sometimes I wonder if such a thin frame can survive many miles... Maybe I'm too exigent, but I think a well-engineered frame should last 50,000 miles at least, especially with the prices asked today.
oronet commander
Junior Member
 
Posts: 103
Joined: 15 Mar 2009 08:10

04 Jan 2013 08:34

simo1733 wrote:I have 2006 TCR composite.I haven't had any problem with it but was considering getting a new frame anyway.
I had thought that I may not notice much improvement with a new frame, but what you guy's have said has got me thinking.

It was a nice bike overall and if I wasn't racing at the time I would have kept it. I just found that it was a little soft, especially for criterium racing where you are frequently sprinting and accelerating. Great bike for all day rides though.
How to ride like a Tour champion!

proof noun (SHOWING TRUTH)

B2 [C or U] a fact or piece of information that shows that something exists or is true

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dict...ritish/proof_1


evidence noun [U] uk /ˈev.ɪ.dəns/ us

B2 one or more reasons for believing that something is or is not true

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dict...itish/evidence
User avatar 42x16ss
Veteran
 
Posts: 6,124
Joined: 23 May 2009 04:43
Location: Brisbane, Aus

04 Jan 2013 15:53

My first carbon bike was my 2007 Cervelo Soloist. Loved the bike, suited me perfectly. Proabably rode no more than 5k per year as I was super precious and didnt ride in rain etc. Last year on a long ride the right hand crankset bearing insert came loose and the bike was replaced :(

Now have a Storck fenomalist rides nice but head tube is so stiff any bump kills my arms.. . . . . . . . . . .still miss my soloist
User avatar FignonLeGrand
Member
 
Posts: 308
Joined: 01 Apr 2009 11:39

04 Jan 2013 16:33

FignonLeGrand wrote:My first carbon bike was my 2007 Cervelo ... Proabably rode no more than 5k per year...


¿5,000 miles/year or 5,000 km/year?
oronet commander
Junior Member
 
Posts: 103
Joined: 15 Mar 2009 08:10

04 Jan 2013 16:48

FignonLeGrand wrote:My first carbon bike was my 2007 Cervelo Soloist. ..................


I've never heard of a carbon soloist.
I have an 2009 aluminum Cervelo Soloist but many other riders think it is a carbon frame - perhaps because of its black anodized finish.
avanti
Member
 
Posts: 1,188
Joined: 11 May 2009 05:52
Location: At 1,585 m elevation

Next

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

Back to top