Log in:  

Register

Official Lance Armstrong Thread: Part 3 (Post-Confession)

The Clinic is the only place on Cyclingnews where you can discuss doping-related issues. Ask questions, discuss positives or improvements to procedures.

Moderators: Irondan, Eshnar, Red Rick, Pricey_sky, Tonton, King Boonen, Valv.Piti

Re: Official Lance Armstrong Thread: Part 3 (Post-Confession

21 Apr 2018 02:06

Scott SoCal wrote:
Alpe73 wrote:Eight to 12 hrs of lag time .... that’a about right. The amount of time for the haters to deal with their disgust, put on a brave face ... and try to put a winning spin on their utter disappointment.

Like someone who’s lost an election .... really bad feeling in the gut, urged on by supporters looking for a bit of solace in numbers.

Recount! Drowning man waving at a ship who doesn’t see him.

Reality is ... the haters lost. Why? Greed. So **** ironic.

Lifetime ban wasn’t enough, disgrace wasn’t enough, casting Armstrong as the devil wasn’t enough. They wanted to see him scorched, destroyed, totally humiliated ... impoverished.

Greed doesn’t pay, “12”. Now suck it up.


+0

Na na na na na isn’t gonna work, bro. LA’s career path went to sh*t and LA fans are gonna have to live with it. If the victory dance includes the loss of hundreds of millions in income then I’m not real sure what the celebration is about.

Of course there’s more to life than money... but if one keeps score then it’s a bit difficult to say LA wins.

Spin at will and to each his own, of course.


Mine is not a "Na na na na na" dance, brutha. Not about Floyd. Not about $, either.

About people, outside the sphere of involvement, trying to burn a guy at the stake via social media ... your shiv of choice ... for what? Whatever it was ... was pathologically beyond sports banter.

He weathered it all. Tough SOB.

Keeping score? In that regards ... **** rights.
User avatar Alpe73
Member
 
Posts: 562
Joined: 27 Dec 2012 01:23

21 Apr 2018 02:12

My thoughts on this:
I'm not really sure there are any actual winners in this. Looser, yep, but not winners.
I also doubt either Lance or Floyd will go away either. I'm sure that's asking too much.
I also don't think we really learned anything new from any of this either.
User avatar Koronin
Member
 
Posts: 1,276
Joined: 14 Oct 2017 01:42
Location: North Carolina, USA

Re: Official Lance Armstrong Thread: Part 3 (Post-Confession

21 Apr 2018 02:17

ChewbaccaDefense wrote:
Alpe73 wrote:Eight to 12 hrs of lag time .... that’a about right. The amount of time for the haters to deal with their disgust, put on a brave face ... and try to put a winning spin on their utter disappointment.

Like someone who’s lost an election .... really bad feeling in the gut, urged on by supporters looking for a bit of solace in numbers.

Recount! Drowning man waving at a ship who doesn’t see him.

Reality is ... the haters lost. Why? Greed. So **** ironic.

Lifetime ban wasn’t enough, disgrace wasn’t enough, casting Armstrong as the devil wasn’t enough. They wanted to see him scorched, destroyed, totally humiliated ... impoverished.

Greed doesn’t pay, “12”. Now suck it up.


Mmmmm, salty!!!


Dunno ... could be that BFF communion wafer you're sharing. ;)
User avatar Alpe73
Member
 
Posts: 562
Joined: 27 Dec 2012 01:23

Re: Official Lance Armstrong Thread: Part 3 (Post-Confession

21 Apr 2018 03:47

Alpe73 wrote:
ChewbaccaDefense wrote:
Alpe73 wrote:Eight to 12 hrs of lag time .... that’a about right. The amount of time for the haters to deal with their disgust, put on a brave face ... and try to put a winning spin on their utter disappointment.

Like someone who’s lost an election .... really bad feeling in the gut, urged on by supporters looking for a bit of solace in numbers.

Recount! Drowning man waving at a ship who doesn’t see him.

Reality is ... the haters lost. Why? Greed. So **** ironic.

Lifetime ban wasn’t enough, disgrace wasn’t enough, casting Armstrong as the devil wasn’t enough. They wanted to see him scorched, destroyed, totally humiliated ... impoverished.

Greed doesn’t pay, “12”. Now suck it up.


Mmmmm, salty!!!


Dunno ... could be that BFF communion wafer you're sharing. ;)


Nope, it's your tears.
ChewbaccaDefense
Member
 
Posts: 1,675
Joined: 05 Nov 2013 19:35
Location: Nevada City, CA

Re: Official Lance Armstrong Thread: Part 3 (Post-Confession

21 Apr 2018 04:02

ChewbaccaDefense wrote:
Alpe73 wrote:
ChewbaccaDefense wrote:
Alpe73 wrote:Eight to 12 hrs of lag time .... that’a about right. The amount of time for the haters to deal with their disgust, put on a brave face ... and try to put a winning spin on their utter disappointment.

Like someone who’s lost an election .... really bad feeling in the gut, urged on by supporters looking for a bit of solace in numbers.

Recount! Drowning man waving at a ship who doesn’t see him.

Reality is ... the haters lost. Why? Greed. So **** ironic.

Lifetime ban wasn’t enough, disgrace wasn’t enough, casting Armstrong as the devil wasn’t enough. They wanted to see him scorched, destroyed, totally humiliated ... impoverished.

Greed doesn’t pay, “12”. Now suck it up.


Mmmmm, salty!!!


Dunno ... could be that BFF communion wafer you're sharing. ;)


Nope, it's your tears.


Boom Shakalaka.
Instigating profanity laced tirades since 2009
User avatar Scott SoCal
Veteran
 
Posts: 10,717
Joined: 08 Nov 2012 16:47
Location: Southern California

Re:

21 Apr 2018 07:40

Koronin wrote:
I also doubt either Lance or Floyd will go away either. I'm sure that's asking too much.


....what I hoped for most.................

Mark L

....lance still got burnt which can't be bad.....................
User avatar ebandit
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4,050
Joined: 02 Aug 2012 18:24

Re: Official Lance Armstrong Thread: Part 3 (Post-Confession

21 Apr 2018 11:41

Alpe73 wrote:
ChewbaccaDefense wrote:
Alpe73 wrote:Eight to 12 hrs of lag time .... that’a about right. The amount of time for the haters to deal with their disgust, put on a brave face ... and try to put a winning spin on their utter disappointment.

Like someone who’s lost an election .... really bad feeling in the gut, urged on by supporters looking for a bit of solace in numbers.

Recount! Drowning man waving at a ship who doesn’t see him.

Reality is ... the haters lost. Why? Greed. So **** ironic.

Lifetime ban wasn’t enough, disgrace wasn’t enough, casting Armstrong as the devil wasn’t enough. They wanted to see him scorched, destroyed, totally humiliated ... impoverished.

Greed doesn’t pay, “12”. Now suck it up.


Mmmmm, salty!!!


Dunno ... could be that BFF communion wafer you're sharing. ;)


BTW, Mancini was my favorite fighter when I was a kid. I watched the Duk Koo Kim fight with my dad...sad story.
ChewbaccaDefense
Member
 
Posts: 1,675
Joined: 05 Nov 2013 19:35
Location: Nevada City, CA

Re: Official Lance Armstrong Thread: Part 3 (Post-Confession

21 Apr 2018 12:48

ChewbaccaDefense wrote:
Alpe73 wrote:
ChewbaccaDefense wrote:
Alpe73 wrote:Eight to 12 hrs of lag time .... that’a about right. The amount of time for the haters to deal with their disgust, put on a brave face ... and try to put a winning spin on their utter disappointment.

Like someone who’s lost an election .... really bad feeling in the gut, urged on by supporters looking for a bit of solace in numbers.

Recount! Drowning man waving at a ship who doesn’t see him.

Reality is ... the haters lost. Why? Greed. So **** ironic.

Lifetime ban wasn’t enough, disgrace wasn’t enough, casting Armstrong as the devil wasn’t enough. They wanted to see him scorched, destroyed, totally humiliated ... impoverished.

Greed doesn’t pay, “12”. Now suck it up.


Mmmmm, salty!!!


Dunno ... could be that BFF communion wafer you're sharing. ;)


BTW, Mancini was my favorite fighter when I was a kid. I watched the Duk Koo Kim fight with my dad...sad story.


Good eye .. or good Google reverse image search. ;) Doesn't matter really ... unless we put you under the radar with some real boxing questions. ;) Then you might be ****, brutha.

Real sad story. Pro sport is full of them. That's why fans should keep their distance with their Sunday school, Betsy moralizing. You know ****!

"Hurry Home Early" ... look that one up ... and on this issue ... take the advice.

Wanna do some more research, brutha? Research what Ali was whisperin in George's ear.

Go for it.
User avatar Alpe73
Member
 
Posts: 562
Joined: 27 Dec 2012 01:23

Re: Sky - gaming the system?

21 Apr 2018 12:57

macbindle wrote:
aphronesis wrote:I always thought it was about a rough collision with reality and the idea that if he couldn’t be in neither could JB and Armstrong. Some punitive justice that’s morphed some since.


Yeah me too, and I've neither quite grasped the beatification of Landis. A man who took money off people, under false pretences, to pay for a campaign aimed entirely at undermining anti-doping. A man who colluded with a friend to taunt Lemond about his experience of sexual abuse as a child, with the aim of bullying him out of speaking the truth.

All a big bunch of vile sh1tbags, to be honest.


Undermining the charade that is much of professional anti-doping is a just cause.
I agree that the other stuff was poor behavior.
“She lost the old-fashioned way, by being a terrible candidate. Case closed.”
Beech Mtn
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4,615
Joined: 06 Oct 2009 16:50

Re:

21 Apr 2018 13:26

aphronesis wrote:I always thought it was about a rough collision with reality and the idea that if he couldn’t be in neither could JB and Armstrong. Some punitive justice that’s morphed some since.

Elsewhere, claiming the Feds came out ahead shows a typically limited understanding of how governmentality works. And the printing of their own money. Woof.


IMHO, Floyd was in the midst of a mental health crisis. I sincerely empathize with his condition, at that time.

I also empathize with LA's and JB's tight position and decision not to hire Floyd.

Desperate ... (I truly empathize) ... In my opinion, Floyd chose (career) murder-suicide. In my opinion, Media and enablers convinced him he was doing this "for the good of the sport."

So .... it seems ... that Floyd was under incredible psychological duress at the time he brought down Armstrong and doping in cycling. My opinion, is that I doubt very much he did this with a clear head ... with an altruistic desire to clean up cycling. IMHO, probably more of a basic revenge instinct ... peppered with feelings of guilt.

"Revenge Instinct" ... that doesn't smell too bad, says a group of predisposed "hate the winner" types ... who eventually became "TCX." Hence ... Floyd became the hit man they (wouldn't invite to dinner) could use to scorch the person of their loathing.

Sounds complicated ... but rather simple.

Schadenfreude loves company.
User avatar Alpe73
Member
 
Posts: 562
Joined: 27 Dec 2012 01:23

Re: Re:

21 Apr 2018 15:06

Alpe73 wrote:
aphronesis wrote:I always thought it was about a rough collision with reality and the idea that if he couldn’t be in neither could JB and Armstrong. Some punitive justice that’s morphed some since.

Elsewhere, claiming the Feds came out ahead shows a typically limited understanding of how governmentality works. And the printing of their own money. Woof.


IMHO, Floyd was in the midst of a mental health crisis. I sincerely empathize with his condition, at that time.

I also empathize with LA's and JB's tight position and decision not to hire Floyd.

Desperate ... (I truly empathize) ... In my opinion, Floyd chose (career) murder-suicide. In my opinion, Media and enablers convinced him he was doing this "for the good of the sport."

So .... it seems ... that Floyd was under incredible psychological duress at the time he brought down Armstrong and doping in cycling. My opinion, is that I doubt very much he did this with a clear head ... with an altruistic desire to clean up cycling. IMHO, probably more of a basic revenge instinct ... peppered with feelings of guilt.

"Revenge Instinct" ... that doesn't smell too bad, says a group of predisposed "hate the winner" types ... who eventually became "TCX." Hence ... Floyd became the hit man they (wouldn't invite to dinner) could use to scorch the person of their loathing.

Sounds complicated ... but rather simple.

Schadenfreude loves company.


Nah, I didn't like CJ (Cancer Jesus), well before Floyd took him out. But I like Sagan...not Froome Dog tho...that brotha' was sketchy from the AM.

Sycophants love company also.

As for Mancini, reverse google, and then my memory came up with that post...don't really need any more bonafides to relate to rug sniffers. Enjoy the view.
ChewbaccaDefense
Member
 
Posts: 1,675
Joined: 05 Nov 2013 19:35
Location: Nevada City, CA

Re: Re:

21 Apr 2018 15:49

ChewbaccaDefense wrote:
Alpe73 wrote:
aphronesis wrote:I always thought it was about a rough collision with reality and the idea that if he couldn’t be in neither could JB and Armstrong. Some punitive justice that’s morphed some since.

Elsewhere, claiming the Feds came out ahead shows a typically limited understanding of how governmentality works. And the printing of their own money. Woof.


IMHO, Floyd was in the midst of a mental health crisis. I sincerely empathize with his condition, at that time.

I also empathize with LA's and JB's tight position and decision not to hire Floyd.

Desperate ... (I truly empathize) ... In my opinion, Floyd chose (career) murder-suicide. In my opinion, Media and enablers convinced him he was doing this "for the good of the sport."

So .... it seems ... that Floyd was under incredible psychological duress at the time he brought down Armstrong and doping in cycling. My opinion, is that I doubt very much he did this with a clear head ... with an altruistic desire to clean up cycling. IMHO, probably more of a basic revenge instinct ... peppered with feelings of guilt.

"Revenge Instinct" ... that doesn't smell too bad, says a group of predisposed "hate the winner" types ... who eventually became "TCX." Hence ... Floyd became the hit man they (wouldn't invite to dinner) could use to scorch the person of their loathing.

Sounds complicated ... but rather simple.

Schadenfreude loves company.


Nah, I didn't like CJ (Cancer Jesus), well before Floyd took him out. But I like Sagan...not Froome Dog tho...that brotha' was sketchy from the AM.

Sycophants love company also.

As for Mancini, reverse google, and then my memory came up with that post...don't really need any more bonafides to relate to rug sniffers. Enjoy the view.


Will do, man.

Enjoy those down to earth, heart-to-hearts with your BFFFFS ... She Who Must Be Obeyed.
User avatar Alpe73
Member
 
Posts: 562
Joined: 27 Dec 2012 01:23

Re: Re:

21 Apr 2018 17:39

Alpe73 wrote:
IMHO, Floyd was in the midst of a mental health crisis. I sincerely empathize with his condition, at that time.

I also empathize with LA's and JB's tight position and decision not to hire Floyd.


JB was about the only team manager who was willing to talk with Floyd. Riis would not even return emails. JB said he did not doubt Floyd could back to his former level but he could not hire him because of the ASO and UCI. Floyd was set to join Rock Racing, but Rock wanted a Pro Continental and eventually a Pro Tour license; the UCI told Michael Ball his team would not get its license if it hired Floyd. The UCI, Verbruggen, and McQuaid are the reason Floyd was not able to return to European racing.
"Their world is crumbling. Ours is being built."
DamianoMachiavelli
Junior Member
 
Posts: 232
Joined: 21 Oct 2015 22:35

Re: Re:

21 Apr 2018 18:47

DamianoMachiavelli wrote:The UCI, Verbruggen, and McQuaid are the reason Floyd was not able to return to European racing.
Pretty much the same story as with Michael Rasmussen. Yet we're supposed to applaud him for turning on Armstrong instead of McQuaid.

TBH, I'm not sure how much Landis has been driven by an anti-doping agenda. Most of what he says seems to be about painting everyone as bad as he was, both then and now. Like many a doper before him, he needs to show he's no different from anyone else.
User avatar fmk_RoI
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,489
Joined: 16 Sep 2010 07:31

Re: Re:

21 Apr 2018 19:09

DamianoMachiavelli wrote:
StyrbjornSterki wrote:You have to wonder why the US would settle for such a paltry amount. Could that be a reflection of what they thought of the strength of their case?


USPS email and correspondence gushing about the ROI they were getting from team sponsorship and their star witness was going to tell it like it is, that everyone is doping and USADA/WADA is a scam designed to bamboozle the public. On top of that, the DOJ lawyers are incompetent. Just look at how they bumbled the Stapleton/Knaggs settlement.


The DOJ lawyers I have worked with--probably 7 or 8 or them over the last decades are the farthest you can be from incompetent. However, their boss (Jeff Sessions) is occupied with that guy in the White House, and Trump has been working hard to cut the organization down at the knees.
Sciatic
Junior Member
 
Posts: 237
Joined: 04 Mar 2011 06:18
Location: Seattle, Washington

21 Apr 2018 19:49

From experience, nothing grinds LA's gears more than giving up his money. Losing any amount---however minuscule effect it may have on his bottom line--is gut wrenching.

And for that reason, it was all worth it.

You can turn the lights out now.
User avatar TexPat
Member
 
Posts: 745
Joined: 20 May 2010 05:19
Location: Nouvelle Zelande

Re:

21 Apr 2018 20:54

TexPat wrote:From experience, nothing grinds LA's gears more than giving up his money. Losing any amount---however minuscule effect it may have on his bottom line--is gut wrenching.

And for that reason, it was all worth it.

You can turn the lights out now.


You deserve a big hug for persevering to the end. I'm sorry that you ever got entangled with such a perverse creature.

John Swanson
ScienceIsCool
Member
 
Posts: 1,715
Joined: 05 Jul 2009 15:34

Re: Sky - gaming the system?

21 Apr 2018 20:58

Beech Mtn wrote:
macbindle wrote:
aphronesis wrote:I always thought it was about a rough collision with reality and the idea that if he couldn’t be in neither could JB and Armstrong. Some punitive justice that’s morphed some since.


Yeah me too, and I've neither quite grasped the beatification of Landis. A man who took money off people, under false pretences, to pay for a campaign aimed entirely at undermining anti-doping. A man who colluded with a friend to taunt Lemond about his experience of sexual abuse as a child, with the aim of bullying him out of speaking the truth.

All a big bunch of vile sh1tbags, to be honest.


Undermining the charade that is much of professional anti-doping is a just cause.
I agree that the other stuff was poor behavior.



I think you've grasped the wrong end of the stick. I'm talking about Landis's positive test and his subsequent 'Fairness for Floyd' campaign....funded by donations. It was aimed at undermining the (legitimate) case against him, so in effect it was aimed at undermining anti-doping efforts. It wasn't an altruistic move, it was the deeply dishonest act of a liar.
(Warning: Posts may contain traces of irony)
User avatar macbindle
Member
 
Posts: 692
Joined: 22 Dec 2017 16:46

Re:

22 Apr 2018 00:35

TexPat wrote:From experience, nothing grinds LA's gears more than giving up his money. Losing any amount---however minuscule effect it may have on his bottom line--is gut wrenching.

And for that reason, it was all worth it.

You can turn the lights out now.


I was looking forward to hearing from you. I sincerely hope you are well and thriving.
Instigating profanity laced tirades since 2009
User avatar Scott SoCal
Veteran
 
Posts: 10,717
Joined: 08 Nov 2012 16:47
Location: Southern California

Re: Re:

22 Apr 2018 00:37

ScienceIsCoojl wrote:
TexPat wrote:From experience, nothing grinds LA's gears more than giving up his money. Losing any amount---however minuscule effect it may have on his bottom line--is gut wrenching.

And for that reason, it was all worth it.

You can turn the lights out now.


You deserve a big hug for persevering to the end. I'm sorry that you ever got entangled with such a perverse creature.

John Swanson



+1
Instigating profanity laced tirades since 2009
User avatar Scott SoCal
Veteran
 
Posts: 10,717
Joined: 08 Nov 2012 16:47
Location: Southern California

PreviousNext

Return to The Clinic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests

Back to top