Log in:  

Register

Moto-fraud: first rider caught

The Clinic is the only place on Cyclingnews where you can discuss doping-related issues. Ask questions, discuss positives or improvements to procedures.

Moto-fraud: first rider caught

30 Jan 2016 17:17

Renaat Schotte ‏@wielerman 10 min.10 minuten geleden Vertaling weergeven
Official: first rider ever caught with a 'motorbike' is Belgian Femke Vandendriessche. #CXZolder16

Femke Van den Driessche (U23 Women) at Worlds CX...
User avatar Popchu
Member
 
Posts: 623
Joined: 14 Mar 2011 18:17

30 Jan 2016 17:20

User avatar Popchu
Member
 
Posts: 623
Joined: 14 Mar 2011 18:17

30 Jan 2016 17:22

Considering how far UCI is behind cheating, this has probably being going on before even Davide Cassani first did a piece at Il Giro a few years (3????) ago.
User avatar Benotti69
Veteran
 
Posts: 18,196
Joined: 26 May 2010 09:09

30 Jan 2016 17:39

this must be a hoax.
the technology doesn't exist yet.
:rolleyes:
sniper
Veteran
 
Posts: 13,121
Joined: 15 Oct 2010 23:36

Re:

30 Jan 2016 17:41

sniper wrote:this must be a hoax.
the technology doesn't exist yet.
:rolleyes:


I'm a believer now. Go SPARTACUS Go!!!
User avatar MarkvW
Veteran
 
Posts: 5,085
Joined: 10 Aug 2010 20:13

Re: Re:

30 Jan 2016 17:58

MarkvW wrote:
sniper wrote:this must be a hoax.
the technology doesn't exist yet.
:rolleyes:


I'm a believer now. Go SPARTACUS Go!!!

How ironic that the first rider gets caught just as Cancellara finally wins a race again :)
Alberto we love you
on the road
you don't need to say this stuff
we saw you on the road
you blessed us with 9 great shows
let's not argue the toss about the official count
you are much bigger than that
~TourOfSardinia
User avatar LaFlorecita
Veteran
 
Posts: 26,356
Joined: 15 May 2011 09:53
Location: Utrecht, The Netherlands

30 Jan 2016 18:07

It remains to be seen how easy it was to detect. Everybody can put a motor in their bike. Avoiding detection (which is what makes it feasible in a professional context) is a different matter altogether.
User avatar hrotha
Veteran
 
Posts: 14,836
Joined: 10 Jun 2010 20:45

30 Jan 2016 18:09

remember when Ryder 'crap on epo' Hesjedal said


"It's the stupidest thing. It's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard of, It's not possible. It's just not possible"



that new trek of his has a massive down tube!
User avatar Benotti69
Veteran
 
Posts: 18,196
Joined: 26 May 2010 09:09

Re:

30 Jan 2016 18:11

hrotha wrote:It remains to be seen how easy it was to detect. Everybody can put a motor in their bike. Avoiding detection (which is what makes it feasible in a professional context) is a different matter altogether.


Brown envelopes help hide motors easily.
User avatar Benotti69
Veteran
 
Posts: 18,196
Joined: 26 May 2010 09:09

30 Jan 2016 18:16

Pretty sure it's not the first one.
The other suspects in the last years probably gave some money or something like that to cover up.
She's the first one, because she's a "nobody".
Rovinin
New Member
 
Posts: 21
Joined: 22 Dec 2015 14:14

Re: Mechanical doping: first rider caught

30 Jan 2016 18:23

I was watching the race. She was walking with her bike after a mechanical issue. After she abandoned the camera followed her and you could see her jump on her bike and pedal back to the pits. Then the news was that she was too disappointed to comment after she broke her chain. I allready wondered what happened but she definetely did not break her chain. Mayby this allerted the UCI.
Tienus
Member
 
Posts: 477
Joined: 30 Jan 2016 18:15

30 Jan 2016 18:28

According to her dad it is a bike that someone in her entourage placed in her box and she didn't ride the bike during the race.

First part is not really convincing...

http://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20160130_02100012
User avatar GP Blanco
Member
 
Posts: 690
Joined: 26 Dec 2012 11:34
Location: Bottom of a lake which used to be a sea

Re:

30 Jan 2016 18:33

Rovinin wrote:Pretty sure it's not the first one.
The other suspects in the last years probably gave some money or something like that to cover up.
She's the first one, because she's a "nobody".


Would think that this kind of technology would filter down from the better-financed top teams. Anybody who thinks that this is just her is nuts. This kind of cheating requires team support.

I expect the UCI's response to be cooksonish (ineffectual).
User avatar MarkvW
Veteran
 
Posts: 5,085
Joined: 10 Aug 2010 20:13

Re: Re:

30 Jan 2016 18:33

Benotti69 wrote:
hrotha wrote:It remains to be seen how easy it was to detect. Everybody can put a motor in their bike. Avoiding detection (which is what makes it feasible in a professional context) is a different matter altogether.


Brown envelopes help hide motors easily.

That's not how brown envelopes work when it comes to doping, so I don't know why you'd assume it'd be different with motors.
User avatar hrotha
Veteran
 
Posts: 14,836
Joined: 10 Jun 2010 20:45

Re: Re:

30 Jan 2016 18:38

hrotha wrote:
Benotti69 wrote:
hrotha wrote:It remains to be seen how easy it was to detect. Everybody can put a motor in their bike. Avoiding detection (which is what makes it feasible in a professional context) is a different matter altogether.


Brown envelopes help hide motors easily.

That's not how brown envelopes work when it comes to doping, so I don't know why you'd assume it'd be different with motors.


sure ask Diaack.
User avatar Benotti69
Veteran
 
Posts: 18,196
Joined: 26 May 2010 09:09

30 Jan 2016 18:39

Rider, Thomas Pidcock, in the Men's Junior CX WC race came from 32nd on the last lap to finish 5th!!!
User avatar Benotti69
Veteran
 
Posts: 18,196
Joined: 26 May 2010 09:09

30 Jan 2016 18:43

Couldn't they just use a Thermal Imager to search those motors?
If they want to avoid a big scandal just imform the teams about the fact that you're going to start using them do detect motors.
User avatar Mayomaniac
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,570
Joined: 30 Jun 2014 17:11

Re: Re:

30 Jan 2016 18:43

hrotha wrote:
Benotti69 wrote:
hrotha wrote:It remains to be seen how easy it was to detect. Everybody can put a motor in their bike. Avoiding detection (which is what makes it feasible in a professional context) is a different matter altogether.


Brown envelopes help hide motors easily.

That's not how brown envelopes work when it comes to doping, so I don't know why you'd assume it'd be different with motors.


It's not brown envelopes. It's Sysmex machines (which can never be found).
User avatar MarkvW
Veteran
 
Posts: 5,085
Joined: 10 Aug 2010 20:13

30 Jan 2016 18:46

One interesting angle is the possibility of target testing. When asked if she was targeted, UCI-official Van den Abeele was rather evasive:

"Of dit een gerichte controle was? We controleren al een tijdje op de wereldkampioenschappen. De laatste jaren was er ook heisa en hebben we onze technologie aangepast."
(Source: Sporza.be)


Rough translation:
"Was it a targeted test? We have been performing tests at the world championships for a while now. Over the last couple of years there was some drama surrounding it and so we adapted our technology."

So, he doesn't really answer the question whether or not the test was targeted. He doesn't say "yes" or "no", but rather iterates that they have been performing tests like this one for a few years.
“I wish my wish would not be granted!”
Douglas R. Hofstadter (1979)
User avatar WillemS
Member
 
Posts: 630
Joined: 06 Aug 2011 18:39
Location: Amsterdam

Re:

30 Jan 2016 18:49

hrotha wrote:It remains to be seen how easy it was to detect. Everybody can put a motor in their bike. Avoiding detection (which is what makes it feasible in a professional context) is a different matter altogether.


it doesn't matter if it's technologically possible.
motordoping is ethically so far out that nobody would even consider it.
doping, yes, motordoping, nah.
:rolleyes:
sniper
Veteran
 
Posts: 13,121
Joined: 15 Oct 2010 23:36

Next

Return to The Clinic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Ortho2034, red_flanders, Wiggo's Package and 13 guests

Back to top