Log in:  

Register

Sagan Clean?

The Clinic is the only place on Cyclingnews where you can discuss doping-related issues. Ask questions, discuss positives or improvements to procedures.

Moderators: Eshnar, King Boonen, Red Rick, Pricey_sky

Re: Sagan Clean?

14 Nov 2017 11:16

Is Vila even a good coach? The "Live High Train Low" session shortly before Het Nieuwsblad, was that responsible? Michel Wuyts had his doubts about it (live coverage of Paris-Roubaix).

I always keep my doubts in the private sphere when there's no concrete evidxence but about Vila, there is evidence. Let's also remember that he did not dope for any other substance, it was testosteron. Mentioning the incriminated substance is important, not just whether there had been a positive test or not.
Echoes
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,021
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 17:57

Re: Sagan Clean?

14 Nov 2017 12:14

Echoes wrote:Is Vila even a good coach? The "Live High Train Low" session shortly before Het Nieuwsblad, was that responsible? Michel Wuyts had his doubts about it (live coverage of Paris-Roubaix).

I always keep my doubts in the private sphere when there's no concrete evidxence but about Vila, there is evidence. Let's also remember that he did not dope for any other substance, it was testosteron. Mentioning the incriminated substance is important, not just whether there had been a positive test or not.


Correction. He was only ever caught using testosterone. In the history of doping, use of this product alone would be very rare.
brownbobby
Member
 
Posts: 898
Joined: 27 Sep 2017 07:14

Re: Sagan Clean?

14 Nov 2017 13:57

Echoes wrote:
Kokoso wrote:This isn't even an argument. Trying to prove that someone is clean because someone else probably wasn't...


Those in the PRR section know that I'm certainly not the one wishing to prove Sagan is clean. On the contrary I'm waiting for the moment the truth will be revealed if it ever comes.

But rather Durden's argument is a non-argument. It's peaking for one specific moment that is abnormal. Being consistent throughout the season if you are a top rider is the norm.



Spot on! Great champions are always good, on a high level, rarely off-form, and even then they produce decent results. You can't loose 5 minutes on a mountain in March and April, and then in June and July destroy the whole field with ease!
User avatar Blanco
Member
 
Posts: 1,391
Joined: 06 Jun 2017 19:33
Location: Serbia

Re: Sagan Clean?

20 Nov 2017 13:46

Blanco wrote:
Echoes wrote:
Kokoso wrote:This isn't even an argument. Trying to prove that someone is clean because someone else probably wasn't...


Those in the PRR section know that I'm certainly not the one wishing to prove Sagan is clean. On the contrary I'm waiting for the moment the truth will be revealed if it ever comes.

But rather Durden's argument is a non-argument. It's peaking for one specific moment that is abnormal. Being consistent throughout the season if you are a top rider is the norm.



Spot on! Great champions are always good, on a high level, rarely off-form, and even then they produce decent results. You can't loose 5 minutes on a mountain in March and April, and then in June and July destroy the whole field with ease!

Valverde says hello, guys.
Kokoso
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,551
Joined: 22 Apr 2012 06:45

Re: Sagan Clean?

20 Nov 2017 17:34

Kokoso wrote:
Blanco wrote:
Echoes wrote:
Kokoso wrote:This isn't even an argument. Trying to prove that someone is clean because someone else probably wasn't...


Those in the PRR section know that I'm certainly not the one wishing to prove Sagan is clean. On the contrary I'm waiting for the moment the truth will be revealed if it ever comes.

But rather Durden's argument is a non-argument. It's peaking for one specific moment that is abnormal. Being consistent throughout the season if you are a top rider is the norm.



Spot on! Great champions are always good, on a high level, rarely off-form, and even then they produce decent results. You can't loose 5 minutes on a mountain in March and April, and then in June and July destroy the whole field with ease!

Valverde says hello, guys.


And I'm exactly talking about Valverde, Sagan and others who can hold their form throughout the whole season, as a example of true champions...
User avatar Blanco
Member
 
Posts: 1,391
Joined: 06 Jun 2017 19:33
Location: Serbia

Re: Sagan Clean?

21 Nov 2017 08:28

Kokoso wrote:Valverde says hello, guys.


It's not because peaking for a very brief period is highly suspicious that all non peakers are clean. Jalabert and Bugno are other counterexamples, though you could argue that Bugno's short career is suspicious while Sagan tiny race day count (61 days this season) contradicts even Durden's argument. Rebellin is another one. I've long stopped thinking that consistent riders were of necessity healthy guys. Don't make me say what I haven't said. However it still remains that before EPO the most complete riders were consistent, the more specialised riders were not and peaking for a specific period still is highly suspicious.
Echoes
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,021
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 17:57

Re: Sagan Clean?

21 Nov 2017 16:39

Echoes wrote:
Kokoso wrote:Valverde says hello, guys.

Don't make me say what I haven't said.

You"ve said: "Being consistent throughout the season if you are a top rider is the norm." So...

Anyway for cobbled specialist like Museeuw you've mentioned it's normal and understandable why they peak for just short period od year. Because there are cobbled classics just in one short period of calendar. So no, peaking for short time for cobbled specialist is not suspicious of doping.
Kokoso
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,551
Joined: 22 Apr 2012 06:45

21 Nov 2017 18:33

But that same cobble specialist should be also good in other periods of the year. Simply if you're good, then you're good!
User avatar Blanco
Member
 
Posts: 1,391
Joined: 06 Jun 2017 19:33
Location: Serbia

Re: Sagan Clean?

22 Nov 2017 09:03

Well there's nothing in that quote to suggest I said consistent riders were of necessity clean, just that it is the norm. In an idealistic world where dope does not exist, you'd have the best in front on most races and the less good behind. So claiming it is abnormal, certainly when you consider the fact that Sagan has considerably dropped his race day count since his transformation: 80 days in 2015, 71 in 2016, 57 this year. :eek:

If Museeuw is not an argument, than take your Tour of France stars: Armstrong, Ullrich, Riis, Indurain... There's a significant time correlation between the advent of blood doping (EPO in particular) and "specialisation". Coincidence?
Echoes
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,021
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 17:57

Re: Sagan Clean?

22 Nov 2017 10:42

Echoes wrote:Well there's nothing in that quote to suggest I said consistent riders were of necessity clean, just that it is the norm. In an idealistic world where dope does not exist, you'd have the best in front on most races and the less good behind. So claiming it is abnormal, certainly when you consider the fact that Sagan has considerably dropped his race day count since his transformation: 80 days in 2015, 71 in 2016, 57 this year. :eek:

If Museeuw is not an argument, than take your Tour of France stars: Armstrong, Ullrich, Riis, Indurain... There's a significant time correlation between the advent of blood doping (EPO in particular) and "specialisation". Coincidence?


Wouldn't Sagan's race day count have been higher this year than last if he'd completed the tour though?
Norks74
Junior Member
 
Posts: 67
Joined: 20 Aug 2016 18:18

Re: Sagan Clean?

22 Nov 2017 17:17

Echoes wrote:If Museeuw is not an argument, than take your Tour of France stars: Armstrong, Ullrich, Riis, Indurain... There's a significant time correlation between the advent of blood doping (EPO in particular) and "specialisation". Coincidence?
There's also a significant correlation with the professionalisation of the sport, the advent of the World Cup etc. Don't confuse cause and correlation, that's a kindergarden error.
User avatar fmk_RoI
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,874
Joined: 16 Sep 2010 07:31

08 Apr 2018 18:46

A bit of the bloated face syndrome?
Goodbye, Tommeke; thank you for all you have given us!
User avatar Netserk
Veteran
 
Posts: 19,997
Joined: 30 Apr 2011 13:10
Location: Denmark

08 Apr 2018 19:56

....just the sugar rush from gummy bears.............

Mark L
User avatar ebandit
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4,133
Joined: 02 Aug 2012 18:24

Re: Sagan Clean?

08 Apr 2018 21:14

Mario Lexmuller, in 2015-16 banned for possession of testosterone, subsequently hired as a mechanic by Bora.

https://twitter.com/EwonSprokler/status/983083719157313537
pastronef
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4,357
Joined: 19 Aug 2011 08:25
Location: Italia

Re: Sagan Clean?

08 Apr 2018 23:07

Blanco wrote:
Kokoso wrote:
Blanco wrote:
Echoes wrote:
Kokoso wrote:This isn't even an argument. Trying to prove that someone is clean because someone else probably wasn't...


Those in the PRR section know that I'm certainly not the one wishing to prove Sagan is clean. On the contrary I'm waiting for the moment the truth will be revealed if it ever comes.

But rather Durden's argument is a non-argument. It's peaking for one specific moment that is abnormal. Being consistent throughout the season if you are a top rider is the norm.



Spot on! Great champions are always good, on a high level, rarely off-form, and even then they produce decent results. You can't loose 5 minutes on a mountain in March and April, and then in June and July destroy the whole field with ease!

Valverde says hello, guys.


And I'm exactly talking about Valverde, Sagan and others who can hold their form throughout the whole season, as a example of true champions...
there are witnesses that claim valverde doped with everything under the sun since at least 2002 lmao. Great champion my ***, he was probably doped up since his junior days. Always being good is a big sign of years of heavy doping.
User avatar El Pistolero
Veteran
 
Posts: 16,255
Joined: 16 Jul 2010 21:53

Re: Sagan Clean?

08 Apr 2018 23:34

brownbobby wrote:
Echoes wrote:Is Vila even a good coach? The "Live High Train Low" session shortly before Het Nieuwsblad, was that responsible? Michel Wuyts had his doubts about it (live coverage of Paris-Roubaix).

I always keep my doubts in the private sphere when there's no concrete evidxence but about Vila, there is evidence. Let's also remember that he did not dope for any other substance, it was testosteron. Mentioning the incriminated substance is important, not just whether there had been a positive test or not.


Correction. He was only ever caught using testosterone. In the history of doping, use of this product alone would be very rare.


Postal, Phonak, Sky...seems a fairly common part of the program to me.
User avatar red_flanders
Veteran
 
Posts: 6,107
Joined: 03 Apr 2009 06:45

Re: Sagan Clean?

09 Apr 2018 00:04

El Pistolero wrote:
Blanco wrote:
Kokoso wrote:
Echoes wrote:
Kokoso wrote:This isn't even an argument. Trying to prove that someone is clean because someone else probably wasn't...


Those in the PRR section know that I'm certainly not the one wishing to prove Sagan is clean. On the contrary I'm waiting for the moment the truth will be revealed if it ever comes.

But rather Durden's argument is a non-argument. It's peaking for one specific moment that is abnormal. Being consistent throughout the season if you are a top rider is the norm.



Spot on! Great champions are always good, on a high level, rarely off-form, and even then they produce decent results. You can't loose 5 minutes on a mountain in March and April, and then in June and July destroy the whole field with ease!

Valverde says hello, guys.


And I'm exactly talking about Valverde, Sagan and others who can hold their form throughout the whole season, as a example of true champions...
there are witnesses that claim valverde doped with everything under the sun since at least 2002 lmao. Great champion my ***, he was probably doped up since his junior days. Always being good is a big sign of years of heavy doping.[/quote]


He's been consistently winning since basically the day he started racing at 9 years old. Also his most consecutive wins were when he was a Cadet where he won over 50 straight races that he entered. I'd actually guess he wasn't doping until he joined Kelme where basically if you ride for them you were required to dope.
User avatar Koronin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,894
Joined: 14 Oct 2017 01:42
Location: North Carolina, USA

09 Apr 2018 01:36

You'd guess wrong then. Doping is prevalent in the U23 categories as well. And no, he wasn't required to dope, he made that decision himself. His results mean nothing as he wouldn't have won a fraction of the races he won as a pro if he was clean. Kelme was one of the most disgusting teams to ever exist, using domestiques as guinny pigs nearly killing at least one of them. If hell exists Valverde will burn for his sins, along with all the others who were responsible in maintaining that doping culture + omerta.
User avatar El Pistolero
Veteran
 
Posts: 16,255
Joined: 16 Jul 2010 21:53

Re:

09 Apr 2018 01:49

[quote="El Pistolero"]You'd guess wrong then. Doping is prevalent in the U23 categories as well. And no, he wasn't required to dope, he made that decision himself. His results mean nothing as he wouldn't have won a fraction of the races he won as a pro if he was clean. Kelme was one of the most disgusting teams to ever exist, using domestiques as guinny pigs nearly killing at least one of them. If hell exists Valverde will burn for his sins, along with all the others who were responsible in maintaining that doping culture + omerta.[/quote

That would still be at Kelme. After he aged out of Juniors he spent one year with Banesto (yes, same he would eventually rejoin) and then went to Kelme where he spent 5 years before rejoining what is now Movistar. Kelme was not a good team to be with when it comes to doping. Much worse than anything US Postal ever did.
User avatar Koronin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,894
Joined: 14 Oct 2017 01:42
Location: North Carolina, USA

Re: Sagan Clean?

09 Apr 2018 11:57

red_flanders wrote:
brownbobby wrote:
Echoes wrote:Is Vila even a good coach? The "Live High Train Low" session shortly before Het Nieuwsblad, was that responsible? Michel Wuyts had his doubts about it (live coverage of Paris-Roubaix).

I always keep my doubts in the private sphere when there's no concrete evidxence but about Vila, there is evidence. Let's also remember that he did not dope for any other substance, it was testosteron. Mentioning the incriminated substance is important, not just whether there had been a positive test or not.


Correction. He was only ever caught using testosterone. In the history of doping, use of this product alone would be very rare.


Postal, Phonak, Sky...seems a fairly common part of the program to me.


Yes, that was exactly my point
brownbobby
Member
 
Posts: 898
Joined: 27 Sep 2017 07:14

PreviousNext

Return to The Clinic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 21 guests

Back to top