Log in:  

Register

Lappartient is worse for cycling than Cookson?

The Clinic is the only place on Cyclingnews where you can discuss doping-related issues. Ask questions, discuss positives or improvements to procedures.

Moderators: Irondan, Eshnar, Red Rick, Valv.Piti, Pricey_sky, Tonton, King Boonen

Lappartient is worse for cycling than Cookson?

21 Sep 2017 10:32

Between his close ties to ASO and the destruction he was wrought on women's cycling in France, is UCI president David Lappartient worse for cycling than his predecessor Brian Cookson?
User avatar fmk_RoI
Member
 
Posts: 1,979
Joined: 16 Sep 2010 07:31

21 Sep 2017 10:37

Too early to tell. :D
User avatar Alexandre B.
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,717
Joined: 10 Feb 2015 20:04
Location: Paris, France

21 Sep 2017 10:46

Too early to start a thread about it
bewildered
Member
 
Posts: 312
Joined: 15 Jul 2013 02:52

21 Sep 2017 10:53

Time will tell but dear god I certainly hope not.
ontheroad
Member
 
Posts: 681
Joined: 10 Oct 2012 18:04

Re: Lappartient is worse for cycling than Cookson?

21 Sep 2017 10:59

fmk_RoI wrote:Between his close ties to ASO and the destruction he was wrought on women's cycling in France, is UCI president David Lappartient worse for cycling than his predecessor Brian Cookson?



When Cookson was head of BC the Premier Calendar sharnk and domestic racing went from a decent calendar of road racing to city centre crits.
User avatar MartinGT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,216
Joined: 04 Jul 2010 20:48

21 Sep 2017 11:01

I am cautiously optimistic that he will be better than Cookson.
User avatar Catwhoorg
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,941
Joined: 24 Aug 2011 11:00
Location: Atlanta, GA

21 Sep 2017 11:05

Are close ties with ASO necessarily a bad thing? I'm not well informed enough to tell.
User avatar hrotha
Veteran
 
Posts: 15,415
Joined: 10 Jun 2010 20:45

Re:

21 Sep 2017 11:09

hrotha wrote:Are close ties with ASO necessarily a bad thing? I'm not well informed enough to tell.


I suppose it depends on your views on doping. If you think it is prevalent and everyone knows the yes, it's probably bad as you would assume ASO want to avoid scandal. If you think doping is no longer prevalent and people want to catch the cheats then it might be a good thing as they can work together. And every shade of grey in-between exists too.

In terms of racing, it's probably neither good or bad.
Vincenzo Nibali:
"I know how to ride a bike"

Reduce your carbon footprint, ride steel.
User avatar King Boonen
Moderator
 
Posts: 6,469
Joined: 25 Jul 2012 14:38

21 Sep 2017 11:16

I think Pro cycling wants to avoid any scandal therefor no dopers are caught anyway. Unless you think they are all clean.
User avatar veganrob
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,320
Joined: 29 Aug 2010 23:15
Location: The D

Re: Re:

21 Sep 2017 11:49

King Boonen wrote:
hrotha wrote:Are close ties with ASO necessarily a bad thing? I'm not well informed enough to tell.


I suppose it depends on your views on doping. If you think it is prevalent and everyone knows the yes, it's probably bad as you would assume ASO want to avoid scandal. If you think doping is no longer prevalent and people want to catch the cheats then it might be a good thing as they can work together. And every shade of grey in-between exists too.

In terms of racing, it's probably neither good or bad.
For a brief time, during the Pro Tour wars, ASO led on fighting doping. Then the Widow Amaury ordered that scandals were more damaging than doping, so they fell back into step.
User avatar fmk_RoI
Member
 
Posts: 1,979
Joined: 16 Sep 2010 07:31

22 Sep 2017 09:48

It's worth considering some of the things Lappartient is promising to do, so here's a few bits from his manifesto.
ENHANCE THE ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITY OF THE UCI PRESIDENT AND THE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
Take power back from UCI staff like Martin Gibbs?
STRENGTHEN THE UCI’S ABILITY, AS AN INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION, TO WIELD INFLUENCE IN THE GLOBAL SPORT MOVEMENT
Brow-beat the IOC into giving us our seat back?
RESPECT THE UCI’ ENGAGEMENTS AND FOLLOW THROUGH ON PROPOSED REFORMS
Have a vision for the future?
User avatar fmk_RoI
Member
 
Posts: 1,979
Joined: 16 Sep 2010 07:31

22 Sep 2017 09:49

This next one is a biggie and he will be judged on it:
REGROUP OUR 4 CYCLING OLYMPIC DISCIPLINES FOR A SINGLE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP EVERY 4 YEARS
A combined quadrennial World Championships, track and road, BMX and MTB, once every four years. How many countries could host that?

Related to that:
CREATE A WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP FOR “SMALLER COUNTRIES”
Rainbow jerseys for everybody in the audience? (Do you know how many rainbow jerseys the UCI currently gives out each year? Hundreds.)
User avatar fmk_RoI
Member
 
Posts: 1,979
Joined: 16 Sep 2010 07:31

22 Sep 2017 09:51

Another Big Ticket item:
CONTINUE TO DRIVE PROGRESS IN OUR WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS
The really big point being the abolition of the TTT WC, the trade teams having turned their backs on the thing they lobbied for. He also wants a Worlds in Africa, so get the chequebook out South Africa, he's looking at you.
User avatar fmk_RoI
Member
 
Posts: 1,979
Joined: 16 Sep 2010 07:31

22 Sep 2017 09:52

This sound familiar?
MAKE MORE VIABLE THE STRUCTURE OF WOMEN’S CYCLING
You'll have all heard it by now, how he's single-handedly killed women's cycling in France. So take this how you will, but he is saying he'll encourage organisers to run parallel women's races, like what ASO does that the Tour and the Vuelta.
INCREASE WOMEN REPRESENTATION IN THE GOVERNANCE OF INTERNATIONAL CYCLING
Did you see how male Congress was?
User avatar fmk_RoI
Member
 
Posts: 1,979
Joined: 16 Sep 2010 07:31

22 Sep 2017 09:54

This has the potential to make you cringe:
DEVELOP A UCI MOBILE APPLICATION FOR CYCLING
There's a Thick of It episode he should watch...
User avatar fmk_RoI
Member
 
Posts: 1,979
Joined: 16 Sep 2010 07:31

22 Sep 2017 09:55

The next Big Ticket item:
DESIGN A NEW REFORM FOR PROFESSIONAL CYCLING
Basically, undo the mess BC made of reform and start over, which includes
DISCOURAGE ANY PURSUIT OF “CLOSED-SYSTEMS” IN CYCLING
(To Vaughters, Velon and franchises for life...'Non!' means 'Non!')
User avatar fmk_RoI
Member
 
Posts: 1,979
Joined: 16 Sep 2010 07:31

22 Sep 2017 09:56

More Big Ticket thinking:
BOOST THE ECONOMIC MODEL OF PROFESSIONAL CYCLING
Yeah, yeah, yeah, heard it all before, isn't this what those Outer Limits goonies chatter on about when no one's listening? But this:
STUDY THE POSSIBILITY OF JOINTLY SELLING THE REMAINING TV RIGHTS BELONGING TO RACE ORGANIZERS UNDER THE UCI AUTHORITY AND ON THE BASIS OF THE ORGANIZERS’ GENERAL WILL
For those who don't know, that's where it all started with Hein Verbruggen, a grab for the sport's TV money, and that led to the growing chasm between the UCI and ASO (it also led to Verbruggen being offered a gig at ASO - is that where Lappartient sees his future?).

He also wants to:
ORGANIZE ELITE RACES INTO THREE CATEGORIES: GRANDS TOURS, SERIES REGROUPING THE “CLASSIC CYCLE RACES” IN ONE DAY AND SERIES GATHERING “STAGE” RACES
Three rankings?
User avatar fmk_RoI
Member
 
Posts: 1,979
Joined: 16 Sep 2010 07:31

22 Sep 2017 09:58

This next one looks easy but has the potential to be problematic:
IMPROVE THE ATTRACTIVENESS OF RACES
The issue?
It is clear however that some races, particularly those with multiple stages, have become tedious, which is leading to a decrease in fan interest and fewer television viewers. The misuse of certain new technologies may have had an impact on this issue by making the outcome of some of our races too predictable.
Let me hear you say it: ban race radios! Ban power metres! Or as he puts it:
ENCOURAGE INNOVATION AND THE USE OF MORE CONDUCIVE NEW TECHNOLOGIES IN CYCLING
(Bring bank the blackboards!)
User avatar fmk_RoI
Member
 
Posts: 1,979
Joined: 16 Sep 2010 07:31

22 Sep 2017 10:00

This next one looks ordinary:
RE-EVALUATE THE CURRENT MISSION OF THE PROFESSIONAL CYCLING COUNCIL
Basically, he wants to reshape the CCP. Which is going to mean a new job for someone. Like, I don't know, a man who threatened to throw his hat into the election ring but didn't? Come on down, Tom Van Damme! The price is right for you!
User avatar fmk_RoI
Member
 
Posts: 1,979
Joined: 16 Sep 2010 07:31

22 Sep 2017 10:01

Back to boring everyday stuff:
MAKE “DIALOGUE” BETWEEN PARTIES A PREREQUISITE FOR DECISION-MAKING ON CERTAIN SUBJECTS
The AIGCP, the CPA, the AIOCC, they're going to have to speak as one by agreeing their differences before they come and bother Mummy and Daddy in the UCI. No arguing at the dinner table!
User avatar fmk_RoI
Member
 
Posts: 1,979
Joined: 16 Sep 2010 07:31

Next

Return to The Clinic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], silvergrenade, Yahoo [Bot] and 12 guests

Back to top