Log in:  

Register

Power Data Estimates for the climbing stages

The Clinic is the only place on Cyclingnews where you can discuss doping-related issues. Ask questions, discuss positives or improvements to procedures.

Moderators: Irondan, Eshnar, Red Rick, Valv.Piti, Pricey_sky, Tonton, King Boonen

14 Jul 2017 16:28

Goodbye, Tommeke; thank you for all you have given us!
User avatar Netserk
Veteran
 
Posts: 18,888
Joined: 30 Apr 2011 13:10
Location: Denmark

Re:

14 Jul 2017 18:58

Netserk wrote:http://www.climbing-records.com/


6.25w/kg. Not sure how I feel about that given the tough day.
Durden93
Member
 
Posts: 302
Joined: 06 Sep 2016 19:16

Re:

15 Jul 2017 18:55

Dekker_Tifosi wrote:How fast was Bales compared to 2007 (T.Dekker on full blood transfusion enriched EPO blood)?

Faster
Brullnux
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4,825
Joined: 31 Mar 2015 14:41

15 Jul 2017 19:48

Do we have an idea on what an effort like today was?
Kwibus wrote:So much quesions they have. Answers they will never get.
So why questions? If no answers?
-Kwibus, one of the great philosophers of the 21st century
User avatar Red Rick
Moderator
 
Posts: 11,894
Joined: 20 Feb 2012 18:15
Location: Un Año Más

16 Jul 2017 18:26

Col de Peyra Taillade
2017:8,5 km@7,3%---22:03---average speed 23.13 km/h(Christopher Froome)
---22:41---average speed 22.48 km/h(Vuillermoz-Bardet-Uran-Aru-Contador-D.Martin-Landa-Meintjes-S.Yates)
---23:17---average speed 21.90 km/h(Waren Barguil)

Barguil climbs Peyra Taillade at ~6.0 w/kg. Group of 9 favourites at ~6.1 w/kg. Froome flew at ~6.4 w/kg!


http://www.climbing-records.com/2017/07/froome-saves-it-after-fast-chase.html
SeriousSam wrote: Peña Cabarga is like Froome's Mount Doom, the place where his great power was forged into fearsome weapon. He was never going to lose here
User avatar silvergrenade
Member
 
Posts: 1,148
Joined: 23 Jan 2016 17:30

16 Jul 2017 19:12

Just for context, there actually was a tailwind on the climb today. Nonetheless, nice ride.
Goodbye, Tommeke; thank you for all you have given us!
User avatar Netserk
Veteran
 
Posts: 18,888
Joined: 30 Apr 2011 13:10
Location: Denmark

Re:

17 Jul 2017 09:36

Netserk wrote:Just for context, there actually was a tailwind on the climb today. Nonetheless, nice ride.

I would have thought x-headwind if the climb heads east since the wind was coming from NE most of the day
https://www.windfinder.com/report/loudes_le_puy/2017-07-16
User avatar Eyeballs Out
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,286
Joined: 19 Jun 2009 10:17
Location: Thames Valley

Re: Re:

17 Jul 2017 22:27

Eyeballs Out wrote:
Netserk wrote:Just for context, there actually was a tailwind on the climb today. Nonetheless, nice ride.

I would have thought x-headwind if the climb heads east since the wind was coming from NE most of the day
https://www.windfinder.com/report/loudes_le_puy/2017-07-16

Just rewatching the climb, especially the section Froome was alone/with Landa and looked for flags that weren't being waved by spectators.

The ones that were on still poles indicated quite a decent strength tailwind. One flag above the rider's heads was on a near horizontal pole and the flag was flapping nearly horizontally with a wind in favour of the riders. Variable of course as there were sections with more shelter from trees and road changes direction.
User avatar Alex Simmons/RST
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,092
Joined: 10 Mar 2009 23:47
Location: Australia

17 Jul 2017 22:40

An example from earlier in the chase when Froome catches Quintana:
https://youtu.be/E8GIOEW6mXk?t=139

And later on as Froome was still chasing with Landa's support:
https://youtu.be/oAIF6TK_870?t=62

Those are not light winds, rather that's quite strong and is worth the equivalent of approximately 0.3 to 0.5W/kg in no-wind speed terms when riders are with the tailwind. IOW a W/kg estimate not accounting for wind would overestimate by about that much for the sections with a tailwind.
User avatar Alex Simmons/RST
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,092
Joined: 10 Mar 2009 23:47
Location: Australia

Re:

21 Jul 2017 14:13

The Science of Sport wrote:Hi Folks

Interesting discussion. And seeing how I threw out that 6.2W/kg figure, I've also been interested in tracking the stats.

Unfortunately, we never see the real numbers from the top men, but we can get a lot of data off the SRM website (http://www.srm.de/). So here are some "facts":

1. Chris Horner:

On the short climb (3km) up to Mende the other, Horner finished 31 seconds behind Contador, having begun the climb with him. Horner's average power output for 10 minutes of climbing was 6.6 W/kg (422W). Nothing wrong with that, it's a really short effort.

For context, consider Horner on Ax-3-Domaines the other day. That climb took him just under 24 minutes, and his power output was 5.8 W/kg (370W). He conceded about 90 seconds to Schleck and Contador and co.

Then even longer was the climb of the Port de Pailheres, which took 48:37, and that was done at 5.4W/kg (344W). Of course, it's not a finishing climb, so the hammer isn't down, but it does reflect what the peloton is doing.

Edit: Also, Horner's data from the Port de Bales are interesting. He finished this day with Basso, conceding approx. 3 minutes to Contador's group by the finish (not 100% sure of the gap at the summit, but imagine it would be 3 min ± 20 seconds). This climb took 49:30, and was done at an average of 342W/kg (5.2W/kg - about the same as the Port de Pailheres of similar duration).

And then very interesting, we also have the data of Chris Anke Sorensen, who has been the last man to peel off for Andy Schleck. And on the Port de Bales, he rode at the front of the peloton for 21:34 and produced 6.1W/kg. The smaller Schleck, riding behind him, would produce less than this - perhaps 5.8W to 6.0W/kg, and that's a good indication of the power produced by those top contenders.

How much are those 90 seconds worth? Using the SRM to 'validate' your calculations, it might be interesting to calculate. Will have a look later, just have to sort out some things first. Cozy Beehive will beat me to it and probably do a better job than I can...

But I think the Tour is substantially slower. The days where climbs lasting 40 minutes or more were done at even just above 6W/kg WITH attacks are no longer with us...and never mind the 6.7W/kg that we've heard of, and know that guys were producing for close to 40 minutes.

On the note of Portoleau, I do feel that all he needs to do is give the times. He has this massive database and if you could show that they did Ax-3-Domaines 90 seconds slower than in previous years, that's compelling. Even with temperature and race situation, you'd have a tough time explaining that difference away entirely. And then the other thing to do is take the average time of the top 20, and positions say 50 to 60, to get an idea of depth. Almost certain it's a lot slower.

The other thing about the power, as Martin points out, is that in theory, if they rode one pace, they'd be faster. But I don't remember one paced riding too often. There are always attacks. Schleck-Contador was extreme the other day, but that's why it would be most interesting to look at the depth and quality.

You can see it in the racing, because as fierce as the attacks are, they're not doing the same damage as previous years, they're less frequent and interspersed with much slower riding, and the guy in the breakaway (Voeckler and Riblon) have held off.

Ross


Hi Ross,

Those numbers of old 6.7 watts/kg, that is fantasy stuff. The reality is that Lance's 6.7 number as measured by Ferrari was for a 4 km climb of 9%, about 11 minutes, not 40 minutes. This is a normal power output for an elite endurance cyclist at his peak of fitness with or without drugs.
millgate
Newly Registered Member
 
Posts: 1
Joined: 21 Jul 2017 13:30

21 Jul 2017 17:55

He didn't mentioned Lance. Those numbers could be closer to Pantani's maybe. That's the highest that I have calculated.
User avatar Escarabajo
Veteran
 
Posts: 8,304
Joined: 16 Apr 2009 18:38
Location: USA - Central Time

22 Jul 2017 07:23

The Tucker post is from 2010, ie early days of more systematic and mass data driven scrutiny of climb times.

The benchmark for "normal" was downgraded many a time along the way when more data became available and more climbs were analysed. As it should in order to converge towards the pre epo standards.

At the beginning, say the days of Contador's ridiculous 20min or so raid on verbier, some people were willing to ponder if 6,2w/kg for 40min was cleans on longer climbs. Sure...

In sum, i think this development was the rwsult of a too generous null hypothesis based on skewed data from 1990-2009 or so.
User avatar meat puppet
Member
 
Posts: 1,851
Joined: 29 May 2011 06:57

22 Jul 2017 11:51

So I did these climbs in Italy. I wondered what my w/kg was:

Muro di Sormano, 1,8 km, 15,5%, 14 min 30 sec.
First 4,4 of Madonna del Ghisallo, 4,4 km, 8,5%, 20 min
Alpe di Cainallo minus the last 2 kilometres, 16 km, 6,5%, 1 hour and 4 min
"This is the Tour that will determine If I can drink espresso at the Garda lake the rest of my life"
User avatar Valv.Piti
Moderator
 
Posts: 7,384
Joined: 03 Aug 2015 00:00
Location: Dinamarca, Aalborg

Re:

22 Jul 2017 14:13

Valv.Piti wrote:So I did these climbs in Italy. I wondered what my w/kg was:

Muro di Sormano, 1,8 km, 15,5%, 14 min 30 sec.
First 4,4 of Madonna del Ghisallo, 4,4 km, 8,5%, 20 min
Alpe di Cainallo minus the last 2 kilometres, 16 km, 6,5%, 1 hour and 4 min


3.94 for the second, the 3rd is either 3.7 or 3.16. I can't tell from your post whether the climb was 14km or 16km. Ferrari's formula doesn't apply to gradients over 11 so I can't tell you about the first climb. Hope you enjoyed it!
Durden93
Member
 
Posts: 302
Joined: 06 Sep 2016 19:16

Re: Re:

22 Jul 2017 17:20

Durden93 wrote:
Valv.Piti wrote:So I did these climbs in Italy. I wondered what my w/kg was:

Muro di Sormano, 1,8 km, 15,5%, 14 min 30 sec.
First 4,4 of Madonna del Ghisallo, 4,4 km, 8,5%, 20 min
Alpe di Cainallo minus the last 2 kilometres, 16 km, 6,5%, 1 hour and 4 min


3.94 for the second, the 3rd is either 3.7 or 3.16. I can't tell from your post whether the climb was 14km or 16km. Ferrari's formula doesn't apply to gradients over 11 so I can't tell you about the first climb. Hope you enjoyed it!

16 kilometres so thats 3,7 w/kg. That makes sense since its a considerably longer effort. Thanks!
"This is the Tour that will determine If I can drink espresso at the Garda lake the rest of my life"
User avatar Valv.Piti
Moderator
 
Posts: 7,384
Joined: 03 Aug 2015 00:00
Location: Dinamarca, Aalborg

Re: Re:

22 Jul 2017 17:57

Durden93 wrote:
Netserk wrote:http://www.climbing-records.com/


6.25w/kg. Not sure how I feel about that given the tough day.


Concerned, sceptical, disappointed? Barguil should not have been making records and doing so well in my opinion given the circumstances of his race. He was being left alone by the team to make tremendous efforts to join breakaways and arguably had less "days off" than any top 10 rider. He was in no way protected. The jury is still out, but I went from being pleased for him to a being concerned with each passing day when he put in a big effort.
Fergoose
Member
 
Posts: 441
Joined: 19 Aug 2011 12:43

Re: Re:

22 Jul 2017 19:30

Valv.Piti wrote:
Durden93 wrote:
Valv.Piti wrote:So I did these climbs in Italy. I wondered what my w/kg was:

Muro di Sormano, 1,8 km, 15,5%, 14 min 30 sec.
First 4,4 of Madonna del Ghisallo, 4,4 km, 8,5%, 20 min
Alpe di Cainallo minus the last 2 kilometres, 16 km, 6,5%, 1 hour and 4 min


3.94 for the second, the 3rd is either 3.7 or 3.16. I can't tell from your post whether the climb was 14km or 16km. Ferrari's formula doesn't apply to gradients over 11 so I can't tell you about the first climb. Hope you enjoyed it!

16 kilometres so thats 3,7 w/kg. That makes sense since its a considerably longer effort. Thanks!

Watch it Valv.Piti, you're being discussed in the clinic now :eek: :D
Kwibus wrote:So much quesions they have. Answers they will never get.
So why questions? If no answers?
-Kwibus, one of the great philosophers of the 21st century
User avatar Red Rick
Moderator
 
Posts: 11,894
Joined: 20 Feb 2012 18:15
Location: Un Año Más

Re: Re:

22 Jul 2017 20:27

Valv.Piti wrote:
Durden93 wrote:
Valv.Piti wrote:So I did these climbs in Italy. I wondered what my w/kg was:

Muro di Sormano, 1,8 km, 15,5%, 14 min 30 sec.
First 4,4 of Madonna del Ghisallo, 4,4 km, 8,5%, 20 min
Alpe di Cainallo minus the last 2 kilometres, 16 km, 6,5%, 1 hour and 4 min


3.94 for the second, the 3rd is either 3.7 or 3.16. I can't tell from your post whether the climb was 14km or 16km. Ferrari's formula doesn't apply to gradients over 11 so I can't tell you about the first climb. Hope you enjoyed it!

16 kilometres so thats 3,7 w/kg. That makes sense since its a considerably longer effort. Thanks!



Wow! That's fairly impressive. Well done
Durden93
Member
 
Posts: 302
Joined: 06 Sep 2016 19:16

22 Jul 2017 22:03

Pan y agua guys! :D
That should translate to a FTP around 260, I think. I don't really know If Im best at 5 min efforts, 20 min or 1 hour. I rode it with my brother and it was clear that I was considerably better once fatigue set in (we were equal otherwise, but he weights in at 55 kg or so, im 73 kg), but I think thats primarirly because Im a bit older and have ridden more this year. I dlsike the 15-20 minutes efforts the most tho, they are simply just brutal. On those long and steady climbs you can get into a much better rhythm and and just tap out the pace, I don't suffer as much there, but I really don't know. Its certainly interesting
"This is the Tour that will determine If I can drink espresso at the Garda lake the rest of my life"
User avatar Valv.Piti
Moderator
 
Posts: 7,384
Joined: 03 Aug 2015 00:00
Location: Dinamarca, Aalborg

23 Jul 2017 00:18

User avatar Alex Simmons/RST
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,092
Joined: 10 Mar 2009 23:47
Location: Australia

PreviousNext

Return to The Clinic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: King Boonen and 11 guests

Back to top