Log in:  

Register

NBA / NCAA Basketball

Grab a short black and come join in the non-cycling discussion. Favourite books, movies, holiday destinations, other sports - chat about it all in the cafe.

Moderators: Irondan, Eshnar, Red Rick, Pricey_sky, Tonton, King Boonen, Valv.Piti

Re:

04 Jun 2018 07:41

Unchained wrote:Curry is not human..GS gets the critical rebounds at both ends.. I would love to see 7 but it doesn't look like it..


Don't know of anyone especially in the media who predicted it would go seven. Most people seem to think five at the most. Game one was a must win for the Cavs and they almost got there. Game two, return to the expected.
movingtarget
Veteran
 
Posts: 8,833
Joined: 05 Aug 2009 08:54

Re: Re:

04 Jun 2018 17:47

movingtarget wrote:
Unchained wrote:Curry is not human..GS gets the critical rebounds at both ends.. I would love to see 7 but it doesn't look like it..


Don't know of anyone especially in the media who predicted it would go seven. Most people seem to think five at the most. Game one was a must win for the Cavs and they almost got there. Game two, return to the expected.



Well that the media didn't predict 7 is meaningless.

Afterall this is a sport where the most well known talking head got EVERY Final wrong for the last 7 years and still acts like some sort of "expert". The second most well known one blamed Lebron for the game 1 loss because "michael jordan would have made the last play". That Michael Jordan maybe wouldn't have carried a sorry bunch to a 106-107 situation against the greatest team of all time didn't seem to enter his single iq brain.

Something close to a majority of the media also believe that losing a NBA FInals is worse than not making the playoffs.

But yes, rational people outside the media didnt think it would go 7. I think even if Cavs won game 1 it would have been like Phily against the Lakers when they won game 1 but got swept after.

But at least it would have been a little interesting.

oh well.
User avatar The Hitch
Veteran
 
Posts: 28,834
Joined: 14 Jun 2010 10:58
Location: London.

04 Jun 2018 18:24

Along the idiot talking heads line: Kellerman is already saying that Step isn't the MVP. We're only two games into the series, how can he make that declaration? I think that his argument is that no matter what, King James is the MVP.
jmdirt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,894
Joined: 06 Dec 2013 17:33

Re: NBA / NCAA Basketball

04 Jun 2018 18:27

movingtarget wrote:
jmdirt wrote:
The Hitch wrote:Wasn't Smith also the idiot who was marking Curry at the end of the 1st half and just let him take a free 3 pointer with 1 second left - which Curry made.

That was another massive mistake. 3 points in a game that ended even, is still 3 points.

Yes, Smith was just waiting for the clock to run out and SC drained a long three (well not that long for him).


Yes and also Love not diving on the ball when he looked like he had stripped Curry. He reacted much too late. A turnover there could have been big. Some players just don't want to dive to the floor. The difference between someone totally committed and someone who isn't. Smith has some history with bonehead plays. The look on Lebron's face said it all.

I agree with you 100% about putting your body on the line to win. In this case I will give Love, a player who usually lays it out, a little slack because he did just return from concussion proto.
jmdirt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,894
Joined: 06 Dec 2013 17:33

Re: NBA / NCAA Basketball

04 Jun 2018 22:47

jmdirt wrote:
movingtarget wrote:
jmdirt wrote:
The Hitch wrote:Wasn't Smith also the idiot who was marking Curry at the end of the 1st half and just let him take a free 3 pointer with 1 second left - which Curry made.

That was another massive mistake. 3 points in a game that ended even, is still 3 points.

Yes, Smith was just waiting for the clock to run out and SC drained a long three (well not that long for him).


Yes and also Love not diving on the ball when he looked like he had stripped Curry. He reacted much too late. A turnover there could have been big. Some players just don't want to dive to the floor. The difference between someone totally committed and someone who isn't. Smith has some history with bonehead plays. The look on Lebron's face said it all.

I agree with you 100% about putting your body on the line to win. In this case I will give Love, a player who usually lays it out, a little slack because he did just return from concussion proto.


Well Love usually is the second most important player on the Cavs team but yes he has had a few injuries along the way especially this season.
movingtarget
Veteran
 
Posts: 8,833
Joined: 05 Aug 2009 08:54

Re: Re:

06 Jun 2018 11:13

The Hitch wrote:
movingtarget wrote:
Unchained wrote:Curry is not human..GS gets the critical rebounds at both ends.. I would love to see 7 but it doesn't look like it..


Don't know of anyone especially in the media who predicted it would go seven. Most people seem to think five at the most. Game one was a must win for the Cavs and they almost got there. Game two, return to the expected.



Well that the media didn't predict 7 is meaningless.

Afterall this is a sport where the most well known talking head got EVERY Final wrong for the last 7 years and still acts like some sort of "expert". The second most well known one blamed Lebron for the game 1 loss because "michael jordan would have made the last play". That Michael Jordan maybe wouldn't have carried a sorry bunch to a 106-107 situation against the greatest team of all time didn't seem to enter his single iq brain.

Something close to a majority of the media also believe that losing a NBA FInals is worse than not making the playoffs.

But yes, rational people outside the media didnt think it would go 7. I think even if Cavs won game 1 it would have been like Phily against the Lakers when they won game 1 but got swept after.

But at least it would have been a little interesting.

oh well.


Well tomorrow is another 'must' win game for the Cavs. Hopefully Lebron can dominate at home AND get a little more help.

As for the whole GOAT argument, I think that MJ and Lebron both can make their claim (with Kareem, Wilt, Russell, Shaq, Magic also possible arguments). Lebron can take a lesser group of players further than Jordan ever could. Jordan is who you would take if you already had a talented squad and wanted to more or less guarantee a title.

6-0 in the Finals vs. 3-5 in the Finals. But the Bulls only went from 57 to 55 wins from '93 to '94 (basketball to baseball). Whereas the Cavs and Heat both plummeted in the standings after Lebron left. There are other factors that come into play regarding those apparently huge differences, but an element of truth exists in it all; Lebron is a slightly better all around basketball player, but being able to score one on one (or two, or three) in the dying minutes of a playoff game is so vital.....MJ is still the GOAT when it comes to that.
User avatar gregrowlerson
Member
 
Posts: 1,807
Joined: 06 Aug 2010 05:46

Re:

06 Jun 2018 13:57

jmdirt wrote:Along the idiot talking heads line: Kellerman is already saying that Step isn't the MVP. We're only two games into the series, how can he make that declaration? I think that his argument is that no matter what, King James is the MVP.

Jason Whitlock, who also says a ton of things I do not agree with, is also saying Steph is not MVP. But he's saying Durant is. In game two, JW said Durant's 2-pointers outdid what Steph did. I don't pay much attention to JW. Same with Kellerman (Max), but at least I think Kellerman sometimes says stuff because he's paid to say controversial things, especially on the First Take show debating against the likes of SA Smith.

As for James, Cowherd was really down on him this week for his baby-like meltdown tantrum at the end of regulation but before OT game 1. The tantrum was his response to dum-dum JR Smith's faux pas of not knowing the time and score when he got an offensive rebound a few feet from the basket, and instead of putting back a shot to win the game he instead dribbled the ball out past the 3-point arc, thus running out the clock and sending the game into OT. That JR mistake was perhaps the biggest finals series mistake by a player that I can remember seeing. Still, and I agree with Cowherd, James' response to that was not the response that you would expect from a true leader of MVP caliber. Baby James could not flush it heading into OT. He could not refocus during OT. He let one play by JR affect the rest of his game in OT. As a result, Golden State proceeded to trounce the Cavs in OT. Some high school players would have responded better to JR's mistake than James did. And because of that, I really hope Golden State wins the finals so James cannot become MVP. But as unlikely as it seems, if the Cavs manage to win the series everyone will forget James being a baby and give him the MVP. What a puke that would be.
User avatar on3m@n@rmy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4,878
Joined: 17 Jun 2010 12:25
Location: PNW

Re: Re:

06 Jun 2018 15:08

on3m@n@rmy wrote:
jmdirt wrote:Along the idiot talking heads line: Kellerman is already saying that Step isn't the MVP. We're only two games into the series, how can he make that declaration? I think that his argument is that no matter what, King James is the MVP.

Jason Whitlock, who also says a ton of things I do not agree with, is also saying Steph is not MVP. But he's saying Durant is. In game two, JW said Durant's 2-pointers outdid what Steph did. I don't pay much attention to JW. Same with Kellerman (Max), but at least I think Kellerman sometimes says stuff because he's paid to say controversial things, especially on the First Take show debating against the likes of SA Smith.

As for James, Cowherd was really down on him this week for his baby-like meltdown tantrum at the end of regulation but before OT game 1. The tantrum was his response to dum-dum JR Smith's faux pas of not knowing the time and score when he got an offensive rebound a few feet from the basket, and instead of putting back a shot to win the game he instead dribbled the ball out past the 3-point arc, thus running out the clock and sending the game into OT. That JR mistake was perhaps the biggest finals series mistake by a player that I can remember seeing. Still, and I agree with Cowherd, James' response to that was not the response that you would expect from a true leader of MVP caliber. Baby James could not flush it heading into OT. He could not refocus during OT. He let one play by JR affect the rest of his game in OT. As a result, Golden State proceeded to trounce the Cavs in OT. Some high school players would have responded better to JR's mistake than James did. And because of that, I really hope Golden State wins the finals so James cannot become MVP. But as unlikely as it seems, if the Cavs manage to win the series everyone will forget James being a baby and give him the MVP. What a puke that would be.


I can understand Lebron's reaction as Smith has done similar things before and James had just given it 100%. Pretty sure the Cavs won't re-sign Smith when his contract is up and they won't be able to trade him. If Lebron stays which is a pretty big if, the Cavs will have another clean out probably. I can't see Lebron winning the MVP. Somehow I don't expect to see much of Smith in game 3. He has been two paced all season usually for the worse.
movingtarget
Veteran
 
Posts: 8,833
Joined: 05 Aug 2009 08:54

Re: NBA / NCAA Basketball

06 Jun 2018 15:19

I didn't see the footage from LeBron on the bench after the end of regulation in game one until days later. You could see J.R. Smith looking to him for some type of hope that they could still pull it out in the OT, but all he saw was LeBron in mope mode. He's human and all but as he likes to refer to his teammates in the same way that a coach would, it was his responsibility to at least give his minions the impression that all was not lost. Instead he acted as if some great injustice was done to him and just him. With that image and the effect it obviously had on his teammates going into the overtime, they were a rudderless boat set adrift in the turbulent waters of Oracle Arena. The Warriors were given new life after playing a subpar game up to the end of regulation and they pounced on the opportunity, with the help of a leaderless Cavalier team.
User avatar Angliru
Veteran
 
Posts: 7,170
Joined: 10 Mar 2009 13:30

Re: NBA / NCAA Basketball

06 Jun 2018 15:47

Angliru wrote:I didn't see the footage from LeBron on the bench after the end of regulation in game one until days later. You could see J.R. Smith looking to him for some type of hope that they could still pull it out in the OT, but all he saw was LeBron in mope mode. He's human and all but as he likes to refer to his teammates in the same way that a coach would, it was his responsibility to at least give his minions the impression that all was not lost. Instead he acted as if some great injustice was done to him and just him. With that image and the effect it obviously had on his teammates going into the overtime, they were a rudderless boat set adrift in the turbulent waters of Oracle Arena. The Warriors were given new life after playing a subpar game up to the end of regulation and they pounced on the opportunity, with the help of a leaderless Cavalier team.

:lol:
jmdirt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,894
Joined: 06 Dec 2013 17:33

Re: Re:

06 Jun 2018 15:53

movingtarget wrote:
on3m@n@rmy wrote:
jmdirt wrote:Along the idiot talking heads line: Kellerman is already saying that Step isn't the MVP. We're only two games into the series, how can he make that declaration? I think that his argument is that no matter what, King James is the MVP.

Jason Whitlock, who also says a ton of things I do not agree with, is also saying Steph is not MVP. But he's saying Durant is. In game two, JW said Durant's 2-pointers outdid what Steph did. I don't pay much attention to JW. Same with Kellerman (Max), but at least I think Kellerman sometimes says stuff because he's paid to say controversial things, especially on the First Take show debating against the likes of SA Smith.

As for James, Cowherd was really down on him this week for his baby-like meltdown tantrum at the end of regulation but before OT game 1. The tantrum was his response to dum-dum JR Smith's faux pas of not knowing the time and score when he got an offensive rebound a few feet from the basket, and instead of putting back a shot to win the game he instead dribbled the ball out past the 3-point arc, thus running out the clock and sending the game into OT. That JR mistake was perhaps the biggest finals series mistake by a player that I can remember seeing. Still, and I agree with Cowherd, James' response to that was not the response that you would expect from a true leader of MVP caliber. Baby James could not flush it heading into OT. He could not refocus during OT. He let one play by JR affect the rest of his game in OT. As a result, Golden State proceeded to trounce the Cavs in OT. Some high school players would have responded better to JR's mistake than James did. And because of that, I really hope Golden State wins the finals so James cannot become MVP. But as unlikely as it seems, if the Cavs manage to win the series everyone will forget James being a baby and give him the MVP. What a puke that would be.


I can understand Lebron's reaction as Smith has done similar things before and James had just given it 100%. Pretty sure the Cavs won't re-sign Smith when his contract is up and they won't be able to trade him. If Lebron stays which is a pretty big if, the Cavs will have another clean out probably. I can't see Lebron winning the MVP. Somehow I don't expect to see much of Smith in game 3. He has been two paced all season usually for the worse.


LeBron should be accustomed to Smith by now. That one possession is a perfect example of Smith as a player: he made a great clutch play getting that offensive rebound off of Hill's miss of the potentially game winning free throw and then commenced to muck it all up because he thought that his team had the lead, initially seemingly trying to run out the clock. After that play, James went into the mindset of someone that fate had conspired against to rob him of a dramatic victory. He probably had it all planned out in his head when the initial charging call was made at the opposite end of the court. So crushed by the events that transpired he couldn't refocus and put on a brave face and rally his troops in the overtime.
User avatar Angliru
Veteran
 
Posts: 7,170
Joined: 10 Mar 2009 13:30

07 Jun 2018 07:52

It seems that the Warriors have all the answers at the moment. Curry can still make critical timely shots even when he's not having a great game. Fortunately Durant had a great game. Kyle Korver once again went missing but Hood played well. Cavs have to make history now to win the title and it's not going to happen by the looks of it.
movingtarget
Veteran
 
Posts: 8,833
Joined: 05 Aug 2009 08:54

07 Jun 2018 14:43

The Cavs don't play good enough defense.
EDIT: and again...
jmdirt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,894
Joined: 06 Dec 2013 17:33

10 Jun 2018 04:09

Take out game one and the playoff series was very dull. I was hoping for better but the writing was on the wall months ago.
movingtarget
Veteran
 
Posts: 8,833
Joined: 05 Aug 2009 08:54

Previous

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

Back to top