Log in:  

Register

NBA / NCAA Basketball

Grab a short black and come join in the non-cycling discussion. Favourite books, movies, holiday destinations, other sports - chat about it all in the cafe.

Moderators: Eshnar, Irondan, King Boonen, Red Rick, Pricey_sky

01 Jun 2018 13:05

Good game 1. James needs more help from his team at both ends of the floor. Cavs got dinged with two bad calls late (EDIT: 3 bad calls as per the NBA office). Smith WTH?! CLE forgot to show up for OT. GS has a lot of ways to score. GS showed up for OT.

The ref made a bad call at the end of OT that led to the scuffle. To add to the fact that it was the wrong call he made a dramatic signal for the ejection. Don't be part of the story line, just walk over to the scorers table and report your call. That being said, Green is a thug and Thompson is a douche so that's what you get. TT, who cares if they take a shot at the end, and who cares if DG is being an asshat, live to play another day.

EDIT: The missed lane violation on Hill's second shot is HUGE. One refs only job is to watch the lane until the ball hits the rim, so WTH?!
Last edited by jmdirt on 02 Jun 2018 15:04, edited 1 time in total.
jmdirt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,056
Joined: 06 Dec 2013 17:33

Re:

01 Jun 2018 13:15

jmdirt wrote:Good game 1. James needs more help from his team at both ends of the floor. Cavs got dinged with two bad calls late. Smith WTH?! CLE forgot to show up for OT. GS has a lot of ways to score. GS showed up for OT.

The ref made a bad call at the end of OT that led to the scuffle. To add to the fact that it was the wrong call he made a dramatic signal for the ejection. Don't be part of the story line, just walk over to the scorers table and report your call. That being said, Green is a thug and Thompson is a douche so that's what you get. TT, who cares if they take a shot at the end, and who cares if DG is being an asshat, live to play another day.


Cavs blew that one with help from the ref. No wonder Lebron looked frustrated.
movingtarget
Veteran
 
Posts: 9,204
Joined: 05 Aug 2009 08:54

01 Jun 2018 13:48

Bron can't hit for 50 every game. Durant won't have such a mediocre (for him) performance at both ends for the entire series. J.R. Smith is guaranteed to frustrate LeBron throughout this series, although he had a better game than any he played in the Boston series. His offensive rebound near the end of regulation play was clutch, it's just that what followed certainly had Lue and James scratching their heads!

It was an exciting and competitive game but IMO LeBron and Lue's complaints are unfounded. He was still moving into Durant's path when contact was made. That was why the refs reversed the call.
User avatar Angliru
Veteran
 
Posts: 7,241
Joined: 10 Mar 2009 13:30

Re: NBA / NCAA Basketball

01 Jun 2018 13:53

A shame the Refs overturned the foul on lebron with one min left when Cleveland were up. I don't care if it was or not, Refs should favour anyone playing this ridiculous golden state team. That durant and steph will claim championships when they fluked themselves into the best team ever assembled like this, while none is close to lebron, is a shame.
User avatar The Hitch
Veteran
 
Posts: 28,896
Joined: 14 Jun 2010 10:58
Location: London.

Re:

01 Jun 2018 15:02

Angliru wrote:Bron can't hit for 50 every game. Durant won't have such a mediocre (for him) performance at both ends for the entire series. J.R. Smith is guaranteed to frustrate LeBron throughout this series, although he had a better game than any he played in the Boston series. His offensive rebound near the end of regulation play was clutch, it's just that what followed certainly had Lue and James scratching their heads!

It was an exciting and competitive game but IMO LeBron and Lue's complaints are unfounded. He was still moving into Durant's path when contact was made. That was why the refs reversed the call.

Read the rulebook on that. Its not 1980 when you had to be set.
jmdirt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,056
Joined: 06 Dec 2013 17:33

Re: Re:

01 Jun 2018 15:17

jmdirt wrote:
Angliru wrote:Bron can't hit for 50 every game. Durant won't have such a mediocre (for him) performance at both ends for the entire series. J.R. Smith is guaranteed to frustrate LeBron throughout this series, although he had a better game than any he played in the Boston series. His offensive rebound near the end of regulation play was clutch, it's just that what followed certainly had Lue and James scratching their heads!

It was an exciting and competitive game but IMO LeBron and Lue's complaints are unfounded. He was still moving into Durant's path when contact was made. That was why the refs reversed the call.

Read the rulebook on that. Its not 1980 when you had to be set.


..."still moving into Durant's path"... Obviously after multiple views by game officials they determined that he had not established himself for there to be a charging call. I guess one's opinion of the play can be greatly influenced by who they are rooting for. I'm not going to deny that I am rooting for the Warriors but if it's that easy to draw a charging foul based on how you think the refs should have called that play then the number of players penetrating to the basket would be few and far between. Defenders could easily suddenly slide in front of offensive players and hip check them with no fear of being charged for blocking. Are you saying that the refs purposely ignored the rule book and just decided to make a bad call after spending minutes reviewing the video footage?

Edit: Go to the NBA.com website and see the video where an explanation is given by Joe Borgia who I think is a representative from the NBA replay center.
User avatar Angliru
Veteran
 
Posts: 7,241
Joined: 10 Mar 2009 13:30

Re: Re:

01 Jun 2018 15:39

movingtarget wrote:
jmdirt wrote:Good game 1. James needs more help from his team at both ends of the floor. Cavs got dinged with two bad calls late. Smith WTH?! CLE forgot to show up for OT. GS has a lot of ways to score. GS showed up for OT.

The ref made a bad call at the end of OT that led to the scuffle. To add to the fact that it was the wrong call he made a dramatic signal for the ejection. Don't be part of the story line, just walk over to the scorers table and report your call. That being said, Green is a thug and Thompson is a douche so that's what you get. TT, who cares if they take a shot at the end, and who cares if DG is being an asshat, live to play another day.


Cavs blew that one with help from the ref. No wonder Lebron looked frustrated.


LeBron played his heart out. The Cavs seemed to lose all of their momentum and motivation once the game went into overtime.
User avatar Angliru
Veteran
 
Posts: 7,241
Joined: 10 Mar 2009 13:30

Re: Re:

01 Jun 2018 16:52

Angliru wrote:
jmdirt wrote:
Angliru wrote:Bron can't hit for 50 every game. Durant won't have such a mediocre (for him) performance at both ends for the entire series. J.R. Smith is guaranteed to frustrate LeBron throughout this series, although he had a better game than any he played in the Boston series. His offensive rebound near the end of regulation play was clutch, it's just that what followed certainly had Lue and James scratching their heads!

It was an exciting and competitive game but IMO LeBron and Lue's complaints are unfounded. He was still moving into Durant's path when contact was made. That was why the refs reversed the call.

Read the rulebook on that. Its not 1980 when you had to be set.


..."still moving into Durant's path"... Obviously after multiple views by game officials they determined that he had not established himself for there to be a charging call. I guess one's opinion of the play can be greatly influenced by who they are rooting for. I'm not going to deny that I am rooting for the Warriors but if it's that easy to draw a charging foul based on how you think the refs should have called that play then the number of players penetrating to the basket would be few and far between. Defenders could easily suddenly slide in front of offensive players and hip check them with no fear of being charged for blocking. Are you saying that the refs purposely ignored the rule book and just decided to make a bad call after spending minutes reviewing the video footage?

Edit: Go to the NBA.com website and see the video where an explanation is given by Joe Borgia who I think is a representative from the NBA replay center.

I saw his vid plus others from credible sources (retired refs, rules experts, etc. not counting the 100s of talking heads). Joe must defend what happened, but the others just have to tell it like it is. 98/100 times this is a charge in the NBA so I guess they got one of the two. If James wouldn't have braced for the contact it would have looked 'cleaner'. I'm not saying they purposely ignored the rule book, I'm saying that they didn't interpret it correctly. Joe says "Kenny, the rules are very confusing." I'll leave it at that.

As far as being influenced by who I want to win...I'm rooting for seven good games.
jmdirt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,056
Joined: 06 Dec 2013 17:33

01 Jun 2018 17:10

Seven games..road wins for both teams!!! James scoring 75+ points in one game
Unchained
Member
 
Posts: 705
Joined: 05 Sep 2016 00:24

Re: Re:

01 Jun 2018 23:19

Angliru wrote:
movingtarget wrote:
jmdirt wrote:Good game 1. James needs more help from his team at both ends of the floor. Cavs got dinged with two bad calls late. Smith WTH?! CLE forgot to show up for OT. GS has a lot of ways to score. GS showed up for OT.

The ref made a bad call at the end of OT that led to the scuffle. To add to the fact that it was the wrong call he made a dramatic signal for the ejection. Don't be part of the story line, just walk over to the scorers table and report your call. That being said, Green is a thug and Thompson is a douche so that's what you get. TT, who cares if they take a shot at the end, and who cares if DG is being an asshat, live to play another day.


Cavs blew that one with help from the ref. No wonder Lebron looked frustrated.


LeBron played his heart out. The Cavs seemed to lose all of their momentum and motivation once the game went into overtime.


As is often the way, the team that looked like winning just before overtime, loses momentum and start over thinking. I have to admit I thought the call on Lebron could go either way. It looked awkward. Could come back to haunt the Cavs later in the series especially if there are other close games.
movingtarget
Veteran
 
Posts: 9,204
Joined: 05 Aug 2009 08:54

02 Jun 2018 00:41

Let’s do some analysis of that “bad” call. Durant drove to the basket, and ran into James. The initial call was against Durant, for charging; it was reversed to blocking, against James. There are two issues that need to be separated: first, what was the correct call? And second, should the play even have been reviewed?

The correct call appears to have been blocking, because on replay, James was clearly still moving at the time Durant ran into him, and further, James shifted his body in a way that he appeared to initiate contact. So it seems the refs did get the call right.

The real problem was in the review. The rules say that kind of play can’t be reviewed unless there’s a question of whether the defender, James in this case, was in the restricted area. He clearly was not, wasn’t close, so the play should not have been reviewable. Once it was reviewed, and only then, could other factors, such as James’s movement, be taken into account.

There’s a simple legal analogy for this situation. The police illegally enter your home, and while there, find drugs, so they arrest you. The drugs were there, the drugs are illegal, the law says you should be arrested for having them. But if the police had been following the law, none of this could have happened.

There is even a doping analogy. Landis was sanctioned for a positive in the testosterone isotope test. But that test is only supposed to be applied if his T/E ratio was above a certain criterion, and during the CAS hearing it came out that there were enough problems with the lab’s measurement of that that the isotope test never should have been run.

All that said, all this talk about how this call cost the Cavs the game is a little exaggerated. The probability of their winning would have increased quite a bit, but it wasn't a stark win vs. loss change. If the charging call stood, the Cavs would have got the ball with a two point lead and 30+ seconds to play. They could have run the game clock down to about ten seconds, and if they made a field goal, would have had a four (or five) point lead. In that case it would have been very hard for the Warriors to win. But if the Warriors had stopped them, they would have got the ball back with time to shoot a tying or winning basket.

Let’s say the odds of a stop were 50/50, and the odds of a tying basket were 50/50. So the Warriors still had roughly a 25% chance of tying the game, which means the Cavs had a 75% chance of winning in regulation. Also, if the Warriors had tied the game, the Cavs still would have had about a 50% chance of winning in OT, so overall their chances of winning were close to 90%.

That’s pretty certain, right? Yes, but as events actually unfolded, the game did go to OT, which means that Cavs still had a 50% chance of winning. So the call reduced their odds from about 90% to 50%. That’s a very significant decrease, the Cavs certainly have reason to be upset, but it’s not as though the call made it certain they would lose. It turned a near-certain win into a 50/50 proposition. And it was only 50/50 because of the mistakes the Cavs made later in the game; they still could have won, even with that call.

What about those Cavs’s mistakes later in the game? With about five seconds to play, and trailing by one, a Cav player got two free throws. He made the first to tie the game, but missed the second. He missed the second badly, which was actually a break for the Cavs, because it bounced towards one of their own players, J.R. Smith. The miss was the kind of thing players sometimes attempt intentionally when the free throw would still leave the team short, and they need a quick field goal. Smith, though, just dribbled until it was too late for a shot.

Did these cost the Cavs the game? If the second FT had been made, they would have had a one point lead with about five seconds left. That would be enough time for the Warriors to get a shot off, so it would not have been a certain Cavs win by any means. Let’s say their odds would have been about 70%. What if the Cavs had attempted the FG after Smith rebounded? James was wide open in the corner; Smith could have passed to him. By that time, the clock would be down to close to zero, so if James had made that hypothetical shot, the Cavs almost certainly would have won. But a wide open shot from that distance is not a certainty; it’s roughly 50/50.

Which is about what the Cavs faced going into OT anyway! People who claim these plays cost the Cavs the game forget this. The Cavs did not lose in regulation; they went into OT, where they still had about a 50/50 chance of winning. So whatever the odds were of the Cavs winning if the refs had not reversed that call; if the second free throw had not been missed; if Smith had passed to James; those odds have to be compared not to 0%, but to 50%. Once one realizes this, one sees that while these were critical plays, they did not affect the outcome of the game quite as dramatically as many are claiming.
Merckx index
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,741
Joined: 27 Jul 2010 19:19

02 Jun 2018 12:20

Smith obviously didn't know the score and Lebron could have taken the shot instead of passing to Hill. Many are surprised he didn't with the way he was shooting. Hill is an 80% shooter from the line but missed the second shot. Exciting game but like many others have said, the Cavs needed to steal a game on the road and they had a great chance to do that before Iguodola comes back from injury and tightens up the Warriors defense.
movingtarget
Veteran
 
Posts: 9,204
Joined: 05 Aug 2009 08:54

Re: NBA / NCAA Basketball

02 Jun 2018 13:02

Wasn't Smith also the idiot who was marking Curry at the end of the 1st half and just let him take a free 3 pointer with 1 second left - which Curry made.

That was another massive mistake. 3 points in a game that ended even, is still 3 points.
User avatar The Hitch
Veteran
 
Posts: 28,896
Joined: 14 Jun 2010 10:58
Location: London.

Re: NBA / NCAA Basketball

02 Jun 2018 15:11

The Hitch wrote:Wasn't Smith also the idiot who was marking Curry at the end of the 1st half and just let him take a free 3 pointer with 1 second left - which Curry made.

That was another massive mistake. 3 points in a game that ended even, is still 3 points.

Yes, Smith was just waiting for the clock to run out and SC drained a long three (well not that long for him).
jmdirt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,056
Joined: 06 Dec 2013 17:33

02 Jun 2018 15:21

A defender can be moving and still be in a defensive position. Several have referred to James 'not being set'. Being set hasn't been in the rule book for a long time. I say he is bracing for contact, others are saying he is initiating contact. The only one who knows the answer to that is James.

I edited my original post about the game, but I'll also add it here: the official who's only job on a free throw is to watch the lane missed a lane violation on Green on Hill's second shot. Hill should have gotten another shot. Merckx, you have to redo all of your odds/probabilities now! :lol:

Merckx: " What if the Cavs had attempted the FG after Smith rebounded? James was wide open in the corner; Smith could have passed to him. " Actually James was wide open out top, but I agree, Smith should have passed it to him. No matter what is going through your head, if the star of your team is calling for the ball, throw it to him.
jmdirt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,056
Joined: 06 Dec 2013 17:33

Re:

02 Jun 2018 20:43

Posting error.
User avatar Angliru
Veteran
 
Posts: 7,241
Joined: 10 Mar 2009 13:30

Re: NBA / NCAA Basketball

02 Jun 2018 23:56

jmdirt wrote:
The Hitch wrote:Wasn't Smith also the idiot who was marking Curry at the end of the 1st half and just let him take a free 3 pointer with 1 second left - which Curry made.

That was another massive mistake. 3 points in a game that ended even, is still 3 points.

Yes, Smith was just waiting for the clock to run out and SC drained a long three (well not that long for him).


Yes and also Love not diving on the ball when he looked like he had stripped Curry. He reacted much too late. A turnover there could have been big. Some players just don't want to dive to the floor. The difference between someone totally committed and someone who isn't. Smith has some history with bonehead plays. The look on Lebron's face said it all.
movingtarget
Veteran
 
Posts: 9,204
Joined: 05 Aug 2009 08:54

04 Jun 2018 02:43

I'll have to look at the stats for a total, but if the Cavs 'give' the Warriors that many easy buckets in the paint, they have no chance.
jmdirt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,056
Joined: 06 Dec 2013 17:33

Re: NBA / NCAA Basketball

04 Jun 2018 02:53

The Hitch wrote:A shame the Refs overturned the foul on lebron with one min left when Cleveland were up. I don't care if it was or not, Refs should favour anyone playing this ridiculous golden state team. That durant and steph will claim championships when they fluked themselves into the best team ever assembled like this, while none is close to lebron, is a shame.


My my my, those grapes are sour.

Tonight, Curry fluked himself into a lot of freakish 3 pointers...maybe he contributes to the championships...just a little...
ChewbaccaDefense
Member
 
Posts: 1,934
Joined: 05 Nov 2013 19:35
Location: Nevada City, CA

04 Jun 2018 03:51

Curry is not human..GS gets the critical rebounds at both ends.. I would love to see 7 but it doesn't look like it..
Unchained
Member
 
Posts: 705
Joined: 05 Sep 2016 00:24

PreviousNext

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 10 guests

Back to top