Log in:  

Register

The real Tennis thread.

Grab a short black and come join in the non-cycling discussion. Favourite books, movies, holiday destinations, other sports - chat about it all in the cafe.

Moderators: Irondan, Eshnar, Red Rick, Valv.Piti, Pricey_sky, Tonton, King Boonen

25 Jan 2017 19:41

I'm getting too nostalgic and excited with a possible final between the two goats of tennis. This new generation wouldn't had a chance against a federer in his prime or a nadal in his prime so i don't care about new faces in finals because they don't simply have the quality of fab four
portugal11
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,651
Joined: 05 Aug 2015 23:15

Re:

25 Jan 2017 22:55

portugal11 wrote:I'm getting too nostalgic and excited with a possible final between the two goats of tennis. This new generation wouldn't had a chance against a federer in his prime or a nadal in his prime so i don't care about new faces in finals because they don't simply have the quality of fab four


i don't have a problem with that but I think Wawrinka will spoil the party.
movingtarget
Veteran
 
Posts: 7,929
Joined: 05 Aug 2009 08:54

25 Jan 2017 23:01

Just watched the highlights of Nadal-Dimitrov at the Aussie Open three years ago and I'm really thinking Dimitrov has a decent shot at the final too. That match was crazy high level, and Nadal isn't near as fast as he was back then.
Kwibus wrote:So much quesions they have. Answers they will never get.
So why questions? If no answers?
-Kwibus, one of the great philosophers of the 21st century
User avatar Red Rick
Moderator
 
Posts: 11,856
Joined: 20 Feb 2012 18:15
Location: Un Año Más

Re: Re:

26 Jan 2017 12:13

movingtarget wrote:
portugal11 wrote:I'm getting too nostalgic and excited with a possible final between the two goats of tennis. This new generation wouldn't had a chance against a federer in his prime or a nadal in his prime so i don't care about new faces in finals because they don't simply have the quality of fab four


i don't have a problem with that but I think Wawrinka will spoil the party.

Fed in the final! I hope he meets Dimitrov
"If I had stopped for coffee, they would have done the same. They never got off my wheel." - Fabian Cancellara after Paris-Roubaix 2011.
User avatar Cance > TheRest
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,887
Joined: 17 Apr 2013 18:38
Location: Denmark

26 Jan 2017 12:44

What a strange game between federer and stan. What could be a easy victory for federer, has became almost a victory for stan. He had 3 break points in the fifth set
portugal11
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,651
Joined: 05 Aug 2015 23:15

26 Jan 2017 12:52

Would love to see Federer win the title.
movingtarget
Veteran
 
Posts: 7,929
Joined: 05 Aug 2009 08:54

Re:

26 Jan 2017 13:21

portugal11 wrote:What a strange game between federer and stan. What could be a easy victory for federer, has became almost a victory for stan. He had 3 break points in the fifth set

Both players were extremely nervous in the fifth set just playing it safe. It seems like Stan could not keep his cool and made some stupid errors that tipped the game
"If I had stopped for coffee, they would have done the same. They never got off my wheel." - Fabian Cancellara after Paris-Roubaix 2011.
User avatar Cance > TheRest
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,887
Joined: 17 Apr 2013 18:38
Location: Denmark

27 Jan 2017 12:08

Dimitrov hanging in there against Nadal in the fourth set.
movingtarget
Veteran
 
Posts: 7,929
Joined: 05 Aug 2009 08:54

27 Jan 2017 15:18

Fedal it is. I am disappoint
Kwibus wrote:So much quesions they have. Answers they will never get.
So why questions? If no answers?
-Kwibus, one of the great philosophers of the 21st century
User avatar Red Rick
Moderator
 
Posts: 11,856
Joined: 20 Feb 2012 18:15
Location: Un Año Más

Re: The real Tennis thread.

27 Jan 2017 15:43

Image
User avatar Gigs_98
Veteran
 
Posts: 5,087
Joined: 18 Feb 2015 18:36
Location: Austria

27 Jan 2017 16:24

well, many fans got what they wanted.
Hopefully we will have a "big" version of a final.
Dazed and Confused
Veteran
 
Posts: 11,378
Joined: 27 Jan 2012 23:14

27 Jan 2017 16:56

Yes yes!!! What a game, this is the old nadal, he saved a lot of break points and stepped up his game in critical moments. I just hope a win from federer
portugal11
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,651
Joined: 05 Aug 2015 23:15

Re:

27 Jan 2017 17:42

Red Rick wrote:Fedal it is. I am disappoint

Why? Dimitrov is only 25 will have many more chances to reach a final, while this is the last Fedal we can have
Brullnux
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4,801
Joined: 31 Mar 2015 14:41

Re: Re:

27 Jan 2017 20:35

Brullnux wrote:
Red Rick wrote:Fedal it is. I am disappoint

Why? Dimitrov is only 25 will have many more chances to reach a final, while this is the last Fedal we can have

I'm more longing new Grand Slam champions and finalists then for a matchup based on pure nostalgia. I think the fact that Dimitrov is only 25 here means absolutely nothing. The previous time he played a slam semi was Wimbledon 2014. You absolutely cannot take that stuff for granted, so I think that's a thing that give no solace for a player whatsoever. History is full of players who had a bright future once and many years ahead to win slams before they crashed and burned. I'd rather see them win now, especially when it's a player I like.

Furthermore, this match is already being hyped as the 'biggest match ever', while common sense says it can never be as good as their matches from the past. Both players are years past their physical peak and simply no longer able to play like they did back then. They adapted well though, and made the final, but if they fail to adapt well, they just break down and it gets ugly. If Federer hasn't recovered well from the injury he sustained in the Wawrinka match, then it's not gonna be a classic, it's gonna be a massacre. Also, the rivalry has historically been pretty one sided. Nadal leads Federer 23-11 overall, 7-2 in Grand Slams, and 3-0 at the Australian Open. Nadal is simply a huge favourite. I'd rather see a more unpredictable match in the final.

Lastly, I'm not that big on the Federer and Nadal hype. The larger that gets, the larger the hole they leave when they do finally retire.


Don't get me wrong. It's gonna be a huge match, but I don't think it's as big as it's made out to be, and the match would've been huge regardless.
Kwibus wrote:So much quesions they have. Answers they will never get.
So why questions? If no answers?
-Kwibus, one of the great philosophers of the 21st century
User avatar Red Rick
Moderator
 
Posts: 11,856
Joined: 20 Feb 2012 18:15
Location: Un Año Más

Re: Re:

27 Jan 2017 23:44

Red Rick wrote:
Brullnux wrote:
Red Rick wrote:Fedal it is. I am disappoint

Why? Dimitrov is only 25 will have many more chances to reach a final, while this is the last Fedal we can have

I'm more longing new Grand Slam champions and finalists then for a matchup based on pure nostalgia. I think the fact that Dimitrov is only 25 here means absolutely nothing. The previous time he played a slam semi was Wimbledon 2014. You absolutely cannot take that stuff for granted, so I think that's a thing that give no solace for a player whatsoever. History is full of players who had a bright future once and many years ahead to win slams before they crashed and burned. I'd rather see them win now, especially when it's a player I like.

Furthermore, this match is already being hyped as the 'biggest match ever', while common sense says it can never be as good as their matches from the past. Both players are years past their physical peak and simply no longer able to play like they did back then. They adapted well though, and made the final, but if they fail to adapt well, they just break down and it gets ugly. If Federer hasn't recovered well from the injury he sustained in the Wawrinka match, then it's not gonna be a classic, it's gonna be a massacre. Also, the rivalry has historically been pretty one sided. Nadal leads Federer 23-11 overall, 7-2 in Grand Slams, and 3-0 at the Australian Open. Nadal is simply a huge favourite. I'd rather see a more unpredictable match in the final.

Lastly, I'm not that big on the Federer and Nadal hype. The larger that gets, the larger the hole they leave when they do finally retire.


Don't get me wrong. It's gonna be a huge match, but I don't think it's as big as it's made out to be, and the match would've been huge regardless.


Federer has a groin strain. Not sure how bad it is. If he goes into this match and he can't play his natural game he has no chance and Nadal was already the favourite even though Federer has had a good two weeks. Nadal just seems to have the game to usually defeat Federer but I have to admit he was looking tired towards the end of the Dimitrov match, Dimitrov looked the fresher but Nadal is in his element in long matches, he just grinds his opposition down and there are rarely any easy points. Dimitrov had his chances and had plenty of break points in the match, he will be disappointed.
movingtarget
Veteran
 
Posts: 7,929
Joined: 05 Aug 2009 08:54

Re:

28 Jan 2017 10:25

portugal11 wrote:I'm getting too nostalgic and excited with a possible final between the two goats of tennis. This new generation wouldn't had a chance against a federer in his prime or a nadal in his prime so i don't care about new faces in finals because they don't simply have the quality of fab four


You counting Djokovic in that? Cos I think prime djoker(2011 or 2014) takes prime fed (2005-2007) and prime Nadal (2008 or 2010) but it would be close, and no one comes close after that
User avatar The Hitch
Veteran
 
Posts: 28,679
Joined: 14 Jun 2010 10:58
Location: London.

Re: Re:

28 Jan 2017 11:09

The Hitch wrote:
portugal11 wrote:I'm getting too nostalgic and excited with a possible final between the two goats of tennis. This new generation wouldn't had a chance against a federer in his prime or a nadal in his prime so i don't care about new faces in finals because they don't simply have the quality of fab four


You counting Djokovic in that? Cos I think prime djoker(2011 or 2014) takes prime fed (2005-2007) and prime Nadal (2008 or 2010) but it would be close, and no one comes close after that

I don't think 2015 Djokovic could take prime Federer based on how much difficulty he gave Djokovic on some of the faster surfaces despite his age. He beat him soundly in Doha and Cincinnati (the fastest HC tournaments) and really could've taken Djokovic at the USO, but lost because he went like 3/17 in bp conversion.

As for 2011, Federer played Djokovic hard a number of times, beat him at Roland Garros, and really should've won at the US Open, though Djokovic did play better in the final than in that semi. However, that Federer was definitely younger and better than the one of 2015.

I have to say that Federer was a very different player back in 2004-2007. At times he barely seemed to use any tactic as he could just outhit anyone. That Federer is without a doubt the best shotmaker the game has ever seen, and he's been making up his decline in sheer shotmaking ability with more cohesive tactics and better transitioning game and net game. I have to say that Federer is a bad matchup for Djokovic if he plays well, but the Federer of old wouldn't be using the right tactic against Djokovic.

Ultimately it also depends on the surface they play on. The mid 2000's had faster surfaces and Federer has always done better on those than Djokovic. Wimbledon has gotten slower as well. Djokovic has learned to adapt to slower surfaces however, so in the end there's not really a definitive answer.

My guess would be that Federer owns Djokovic on fast surfaces, it's about even on slow HC, and Djokovic wins most matches on clay.
Kwibus wrote:So much quesions they have. Answers they will never get.
So why questions? If no answers?
-Kwibus, one of the great philosophers of the 21st century
User avatar Red Rick
Moderator
 
Posts: 11,856
Joined: 20 Feb 2012 18:15
Location: Un Año Más

28 Jan 2017 12:58

The discussion about GOAT is redundant at this point. As Redrick points out nobody comes close to Fed in terms of shotmaking and sheer class.

In terms of exquisite aesthetic talent, I've played players in the Sunday league with more touch than djoker and Nadal and Murray together. Guys like Sampras, Edberg, Pioline, even Gasquet all trump those three in terms of estehetics.
sniper
Veteran
 
Posts: 13,553
Joined: 15 Oct 2010 23:36

28 Jan 2017 13:22

Danish media just won the prize for stupidest headline.

Willams beats sister

Oh... really? :rolleyes:
Aka The Ginger One.
User avatar RedheadDane
Veteran
 
Posts: 8,108
Joined: 05 May 2010 13:47
Location: Viking Land! (Aros)

Re:

28 Jan 2017 16:19

sniper wrote:The discussion about GOAT is redundant at this point. As Redrick points out nobody comes close to Fed in terms of shotmaking and sheer class.

In terms of exquisite aesthetic talent, I've played players in the Sunday league with more touch than djoker and Nadal and Murray together. Guys like Sampras, Edberg, Pioline, even Gasquet all trump those three in terms of estehetics.

Flashiness (being good at low-percentage shots) and versatility are easily mistaken for talent. Naturally, both are qualities which get you into the highlights real, and the reason most people watch tennis. Everything that's not spectacular is underappreciated because it doesn't look as hard on first sight. Gilles Simon is often looked at as a talentless pusher, who can only run back and forth, has no huge power, has a below-average serve, below-average volleys and no slice backhand. Yet he's been like 6th in the world and beaten all of the Big 4. That guy is very talented, and crazy smart, and yet he gets little credit for it.

And I think it's a lot easier to look like you have touch and pull off volley's in a Sunday league cause you have twice as much time to hit an easier ball.


RedheadDane wrote:Danish media just won the prize for stupidest headline.

Willams beats sister

Oh... really? :rolleyes:

Lol. It's not like I had high expectations of what a mainstream newspaper write about a sport, but this is truly a decent effort at half-arsing your job.
Kwibus wrote:So much quesions they have. Answers they will never get.
So why questions? If no answers?
-Kwibus, one of the great philosophers of the 21st century
User avatar Red Rick
Moderator
 
Posts: 11,856
Joined: 20 Feb 2012 18:15
Location: Un Año Más

PreviousNext

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

Back to top