Log in:  

Register

The real Tennis thread.

Grab a short black and come join in the non-cycling discussion. Favourite books, movies, holiday destinations, other sports - chat about it all in the cafe.

Moderators: Eshnar, Irondan, King Boonen, Red Rick, Pricey_sky

27 Jan 2018 23:03

Wanted Halep to win but had a feeling that the accumulated battles would wear her down not to mention her usual nerves. Wozniacki had a good tournament and deserved her win.
movingtarget
Veteran
 
Posts: 9,212
Joined: 05 Aug 2009 08:54

28 Jan 2018 12:02

KING ROGER!!! he could win this final in 3 sets...
portugal11
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,963
Joined: 05 Aug 2015 23:15

Re:

28 Jan 2018 12:18

portugal11 wrote:KING ROGER!!! he could win this final in 3 sets...

Impossible to say. Cilic played very well in the 2nd set, which could have gone both ways. In the 4th set, I agree, Federer basically gave Cilic the chance to come back and win it. It was a very weak set by Federer.

Overall, I think it was a good match, also for Cilic who managed to wash away the bad impressions from last year's Wimbledon final. Periodically, Cilic was the better player, and in that way I think he really succeeded in showing his potential against the greatest player of all time.
"If I had stopped for coffee, they would have done the same. They never got off my wheel." - Fabian Cancellara after Paris-Roubaix 2011.
User avatar Cance > TheRest
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4,298
Joined: 17 Apr 2013 18:38
Location: Denmark

Re: The real Tennis thread.

29 Jan 2018 02:58

Red Rick wrote:
BullsFan22 wrote:Watched the highlights of the Halep Kerber match. It was pretty good, but again, it's just 'highlights.' Both ran a lot of balls down, especially Kerber...both had power, winners...Halep will really need to improve her serve against Wozniacki, but she's capable of breaking anyone, so there will be a number of breaks in the final, no doubt about that, unless someone is serving above expectations. One thing that surprised me was that for a three setter, and a 9-7 scoreline in the 3rd, it wasn't that long, 2:20. That's good for Halep, because if this was another 4 hour match, it wouldn't have done much good. This is now the 2nd match of the tournament where she's saved multiple match points. This 'should' help her before the final, knowing she can hold her nerve. That said, she is in a similar position as in 2017 Roland Garros. Escaped against Svitolina, then was in command against Ostapenko in the Final and ended up choking.

Just watched those highlights too. Very impressive hitting from Halep, didn't knew she had that kind of hitting in her. I figured Kerber would just outgrind her.

In any case, you could see at times that both players were slowing down a bit in the third set, and started being more selective in chasing balls in longer rallies. Some people claim the women can play 5 sets, but with their lack of serve and short points, it's just not possible


Fascinating observation.

I am more of a fan of women's tennis, and have always felt that they should play best of 5 in GS's, but that they haven't due to: A) individuals not speaking up and suggesting strongly that they should play 5, B) time restrictions in the scheduling.

No GS could fit in all the early round matches if both men and women's singles were best of 5.

So my suggestion is that women play best of 5 from the quarter-final stage onwards.

I had never taken into account the extra effort that most of the top women players (Serena, plus maybe Pliskova on a good day aside) have to put in to win points, games, sets. Most men will have at least one service game a set where they serve 80% or more non-returnables; they're hardly spending much energy, whilst women winning points just off their serve is often at a premium. In addition to that, because of the reduced advantage on the serve for women, they have far more deuce games.

Having said all of that, I feel like women could still play best of 5. It's just a willingness of fans to accept a drop in overall standard, plus more tactical 'tanking'. Best of 5 would also benefit someone like Wozniacki more, and I like the idea of endurance playing an even greater part in the game.

Also on this subject; is it almost ridiculous that men play best of 5, for 7 matches, at Rolland Garros? Their serve doesn't have the same impact on clay.
User avatar gregrowlerson
Member
 
Posts: 1,837
Joined: 06 Aug 2010 05:46

16 Mar 2018 16:43

Roger has been more dominant than ever in this season. he surpassed that strange mental block against nadal and now he doesn't have any challenger so he can win more than 10 titles this season. Tennis needs nadal and djoko so much... federer lost 4 sets in 2018...
portugal11
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,963
Joined: 05 Aug 2015 23:15

Re:

16 Mar 2018 18:17

portugal11 wrote:Roger has been more dominant than ever in this season. he surpassed that strange mental block against nadal and now he doesn't have any challenger so he can win more than 10 titles this season. Tennis needs nadal and djoko so much... federer lost 4 sets in 2018...

It's just ridiculous how bad the competition is right now. Seeing how a Federer who was already labeled "past his prime" years ago can win by sheer will right now really makes me wonder if this Federer/Nadal/Djokovic/Murray era was a once in a lifetime generation.
User avatar Gigs_98
Veteran
 
Posts: 6,278
Joined: 18 Feb 2015 18:36
Location: Austria

Re: Re:

16 Mar 2018 21:44

Gigs_98 wrote:
portugal11 wrote:Roger has been more dominant than ever in this season. he surpassed that strange mental block against nadal and now he doesn't have any challenger so he can win more than 10 titles this season. Tennis needs nadal and djoko so much... federer lost 4 sets in 2018...

It's just ridiculous how bad the competition is right now. Seeing how a Federer who was already labeled "past his prime" years ago can win by sheer will right now really makes me wonder if this Federer/Nadal/Djokovic/Murray era was a once in a lifetime generation.

of course it was... Federer, Nadal and Djoko are the 3 best tennis players of all times
portugal11
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,963
Joined: 05 Aug 2015 23:15

Re: Re:

16 Mar 2018 23:21

Gigs_98 wrote:
portugal11 wrote:Roger has been more dominant than ever in this season. he surpassed that strange mental block against nadal and now he doesn't have any challenger so he can win more than 10 titles this season. Tennis needs nadal and djoko so much... federer lost 4 sets in 2018...

It's just ridiculous how bad the competition is right now. Seeing how a Federer who was already labeled "past his prime" years ago can win by sheer will right now really makes me wonder if this Federer/Nadal/Djokovic/Murray era was a once in a lifetime generation.

There's many partial answers to that question.

Talent influx is way down in tennis, that's for sure. It's been down for a long time, but you don't immediately see that because it only affects the Tour some 15 years after or so.

Poly strings have changed the game. They've led to the modern forehand, the death of serve & volley, and now that all the upcoming youngsters have grown up with poly, maybe the end of all court players too. A lot of the skills and talents are developed very early, and if you have to grind on the baseline to get results in juniors you're limiting your skill cap in other departments for later on.

The level of the Big 4 will not be reached by any of the current youngsters on Tour. Their games all have major limitations. The overall level of the ATP tour is going down, and we don't know when it will kick back up again.

In terms of dominance, it likely is a once in a lifetime thing. But it's very easy to forget how weak the generation between Sampras/Agassi and Federer/Safin/Roddick was. And right now, the youngest player on Tour that holds a Slam title is 29. That's unprecedented too. So you have 4 really talented players and in the 8 years before and after them there's a whole big bag of nothing.
Veni, Vidi, Kirby

I came, I saw, I was dead wrong as per usual
User avatar Red Rick
Administrator
 
Posts: 14,292
Joined: 20 Feb 2012 18:15

18 Mar 2018 22:46

IW final is crazy right now. I can't handle this.
Veni, Vidi, Kirby

I came, I saw, I was dead wrong as per usual
User avatar Red Rick
Administrator
 
Posts: 14,292
Joined: 20 Feb 2012 18:15

18 Mar 2018 23:35

Del Potro wins his first Masters 1000 title, saving 2 MP on Fed's serve on the way. That was some heart in a hostile crowd.
Veni, Vidi, Kirby

I came, I saw, I was dead wrong as per usual
User avatar Red Rick
Administrator
 
Posts: 14,292
Joined: 20 Feb 2012 18:15

24 Mar 2018 22:24

Meanwhile, Federer goes on a 2 match losing streak and loses his #1 ranking by losing to Thanasi Kokkinakis in the 2nd round of Miami
Veni, Vidi, Kirby

I came, I saw, I was dead wrong as per usual
User avatar Red Rick
Administrator
 
Posts: 14,292
Joined: 20 Feb 2012 18:15

Re:

25 Mar 2018 00:10

Red Rick wrote:Meanwhile, Federer goes on a 2 match losing streak and loses his #1 ranking by losing to Thanasi Kokkinakis in the 2nd round of Miami


The beginning of a bigger slide ? Del Potro could win a few tournaments if he can stay healthy and there is so much uncertainty about the big four re injuries etc.
movingtarget
Veteran
 
Posts: 9,212
Joined: 05 Aug 2009 08:54

Re: Re:

25 Mar 2018 10:35

movingtarget wrote:
Red Rick wrote:Meanwhile, Federer goes on a 2 match losing streak and loses his #1 ranking by losing to Thanasi Kokkinakis in the 2nd round of Miami


The beginning of a bigger slide ? Del Potro could win a few tournaments if he can stay healthy and there is so much uncertainty about the big four re injuries etc.

Federer is 36. Obviously the long term trend for him is downwards. His top level doesn't decline as quickly, but it's getting more infrequent, and crap matches are getting crappier. He wins most matches vs average opponents playing average, breaking a time or 2 and cruising on serve. Because of this, and his huge knack for **** up close matches, he's prone to bad but close losses. Federer really lets a lot of matches get closer than they should be based on his dominance ratio, and when points go 50/50 he loses pretty often.

Anyway, he's announced he'll skip the clay season, will be back by Halle, unless he later decides to enter Stuttgart too. This is a bad loss for him, but Miami has always been his worst tournament on HC.

2017 was a ridiculous outlier for Federer, and basically every single thing that could go right went right, apart from having back issues in the US HC summer.

There's one thing in Federer's favour still.

The Tour is in more shambles than ever. Del Potro is the only one with some consistency on HC but he's no fitness animal and can't play that much either. He's considering skipping clay as well.
Veni, Vidi, Kirby

I came, I saw, I was dead wrong as per usual
User avatar Red Rick
Administrator
 
Posts: 14,292
Joined: 20 Feb 2012 18:15

28 Apr 2018 22:54

movingtarget
Veteran
 
Posts: 9,212
Joined: 05 Aug 2009 08:54

29 Apr 2018 16:02

Speculation is that Djokovic would have orthorexia.

Meanwhile, Nadal wins Barca. Surprising. 46 consecutive sets won on clay, one 7-5 set, the rest all 6-4 or easier.
Veni, Vidi, Kirby

I came, I saw, I was dead wrong as per usual
User avatar Red Rick
Administrator
 
Posts: 14,292
Joined: 20 Feb 2012 18:15

12 May 2018 00:49

The streak is at an end.

Dominic Thiem beats Nadal 75 63 in the Madrid QF, after Nadal had won 50(!!) consecutive sets on clay. Nadal hasn't lost to any other player than Thiem on clay since 2016, when Nadal lost to Djokovic in Rome. He may be wildly inconsistent, but Thiem is definitely the best clay court player after Nadal. I just hope they he is drawn on the opposite side of Nadal at Rome and RG.

And as Nadal was defending his win from last year, Federer goes back to #1, and will remain there until the 2nd week of grass season unless Nadal wins Rome next week.
Veni, Vidi, Kirby

I came, I saw, I was dead wrong as per usual
User avatar Red Rick
Administrator
 
Posts: 14,292
Joined: 20 Feb 2012 18:15

17 May 2018 04:42

movingtarget
Veteran
 
Posts: 9,212
Joined: 05 Aug 2009 08:54

19 May 2018 18:19

First Nadal/Djokovic match in a year, and it was a good one. Djokovic is slowly clawing his way back even though just dropped out of the top 20
Veni, Vidi, Kirby

I came, I saw, I was dead wrong as per usual
User avatar Red Rick
Administrator
 
Posts: 14,292
Joined: 20 Feb 2012 18:15

19 May 2018 21:12

Words cannot describe the immense dislike I have for Zverev. I hope Nadal annihilates him.
Veni, Vidi, Kirby

I came, I saw, I was dead wrong as per usual
User avatar Red Rick
Administrator
 
Posts: 14,292
Joined: 20 Feb 2012 18:15

Re:

19 May 2018 23:56

Red Rick wrote:Words cannot describe the immense dislike I have for Zverev. I hope Nadal annihilates him.

Why?
User avatar The Hitch
Veteran
 
Posts: 28,896
Joined: 14 Jun 2010 10:58
Location: London.

PreviousNext

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Unchained and 10 guests

Back to top
cron