Log in:  

Register

Chris Froome Discussion Thread.

A place to discuss all things related to current professional road races. Here, you can also touch on the latest news relating to professional road racing. A doping discussion free forum.

Moderators: Irondan, Eshnar, Red Rick, Valv.Piti, Pricey_sky, Tonton, King Boonen

Re:

11 Sep 2017 13:07

Bardamu wrote:Nah it is crazy Froome isn't nr. 1, but give credit to van Avermaet for showing up the whole year, although some of the small Belgian races are giving way too many points.

Is Froomes season over apart from the TT in Bergen?


Don't think he's down for anything other than that TT, judging by his instagram live from a Madrid nightclub at 4am this morning I don't think much time on the bike the next few days! :D
User avatar Pricey_sky
Moderator
 
Posts: 5,622
Joined: 12 Jul 2012 14:05
Location: Kidderminster, England

11 Sep 2017 13:16

He's not even down for the TT it seems.

"I am definitely doing the world team time trial championships next Sunday but further than that it's probably time for me to put my feet up," he said.
User avatar DNP-Old
Member
 
Posts: 1,714
Joined: 06 Aug 2014 17:38
Location: Sevilla, España

Re:

11 Sep 2017 13:39

Jagartrott wrote:OK Del, let's rephrase it as 'participate and be competitive in more than 3.5 WT races' (I'll give Cadel's race 0.5, and that's just because I'm generous). Point is, winning the World Tour should award riders that are competitive throughout the year - like Sagan, Valverde, etc. If Froome would like to win it, he'd have to focus on more than very few races - and that's how it should be IMO.


I agree with you that that's how it should be, but at the same time it is also true that the system is detrimental to climbers and GT specialists. Only riders who can also race one day races, such as Valverde, Purito, GVA and Sagan can win the WT rankings. Even Wiggins in his 2012 year (where he won the Tour, Olympics TT, Paris Nice, Tour of Romandy, Criterium du Dauphine, etc) didn't win it.

Whilst I think that it is fair because versatility and consistency should be rewarded, at the same time the winner of GT's get way too little points compared to some of the points dished out in several one day races.
User avatar Ruby United
Member
 
Posts: 1,791
Joined: 03 Jan 2012 18:16
Location: London

Re: Re:

11 Sep 2017 13:48

Ruby United wrote:
Jagartrott wrote:OK Del, let's rephrase it as 'participate and be competitive in more than 3.5 WT races' (I'll give Cadel's race 0.5, and that's just because I'm generous). Point is, winning the World Tour should award riders that are competitive throughout the year - like Sagan, Valverde, etc. If Froome would like to win it, he'd have to focus on more than very few races - and that's how it should be IMO.


I agree with you that that's how it should be, but at the same time it is also true that the system is detrimental to climbers and GT specialists. Only riders who can also race one day races, such as Valverde, Purito, GVA and Sagan can win the WT rankings. Even Wiggins in his 2012 year (where he won the Tour, Olympics TT, Paris Nice, Tour of Romandy, Criterium du Dauphine, etc) didn't win it.

Whilst I think that it is fair because versatility and consistency should be rewarded, at the same time the winner of GT's get way too little points compared to some of the points dished out in several one day races.

Wiggins got beaten by another GT rider
Kwibus wrote:So much quesions they have. Answers they will never get.
So why questions? If no answers?
-Kwibus, one of the great philosophers of the 21st century
User avatar Red Rick
Moderator
 
Posts: 11,566
Joined: 20 Feb 2012 18:15
Location: Un Año Más

Re:

11 Sep 2017 14:11

DNP-Old wrote:He's not even down for the TT it seems.


Pity, the profile looks good for him
User avatar wwabbit
Member
 
Posts: 1,127
Joined: 29 Aug 2012 13:38

Re: Re:

11 Sep 2017 14:35

wwabbit wrote:
DNP-Old wrote:He's not even down for the TT it seems.


Pity, the profile looks good for him


Yeah, I think it's kinda bull****. It's not like he's denying a possible winner a place.
User avatar TMP402
Veteran
 
Posts: 5,218
Joined: 13 Mar 2015 12:36

Re: Re:

11 Sep 2017 14:38

Ruby United wrote:
Jagartrott wrote:OK Del, let's rephrase it as 'participate and be competitive in more than 3.5 WT races' (I'll give Cadel's race 0.5, and that's just because I'm generous). Point is, winning the World Tour should award riders that are competitive throughout the year - like Sagan, Valverde, etc. If Froome would like to win it, he'd have to focus on more than very few races - and that's how it should be IMO.


I agree with you that that's how it should be, but at the same time it is also true that the system is detrimental to climbers and GT specialists. Only riders who can also race one day races, such as Valverde, Purito, GVA and Sagan can win the WT rankings. Even Wiggins in his 2012 year (where he won the Tour, Olympics TT, Paris Nice, Tour of Romandy, Criterium du Dauphine, etc) didn't win it.

Whilst I think that it is fair because versatility and consistency should be rewarded, at the same time the winner of GT's get way too little points compared to some of the points dished out in several one day races.
I believe the Olympics don't count for WT.
The sadness of the world has different ways of getting to people, but it seems to succeed almost every time
User avatar Bardamu
Junior Member
 
Posts: 255
Joined: 13 Jul 2016 20:36
Location: Paris

Re: Re:

11 Sep 2017 14:38

Red Rick wrote:
Ruby United wrote:
Jagartrott wrote:OK Del, let's rephrase it as 'participate and be competitive in more than 3.5 WT races' (I'll give Cadel's race 0.5, and that's just because I'm generous). Point is, winning the World Tour should award riders that are competitive throughout the year - like Sagan, Valverde, etc. If Froome would like to win it, he'd have to focus on more than very few races - and that's how it should be IMO.


I agree with you that that's how it should be, but at the same time it is also true that the system is detrimental to climbers and GT specialists. Only riders who can also race one day races, such as Valverde, Purito, GVA and Sagan can win the WT rankings. Even Wiggins in his 2012 year (where he won the Tour, Olympics TT, Paris Nice, Tour of Romandy, Criterium du Dauphine, etc) didn't win it.

Whilst I think that it is fair because versatility and consistency should be rewarded, at the same time the winner of GT's get way too little points compared to some of the points dished out in several one day races.

Wiggins got beaten by another GT rider


You clearly didn't read my post properly.
I highlighted the bit concerned for you.
User avatar Ruby United
Member
 
Posts: 1,791
Joined: 03 Jan 2012 18:16
Location: London

11 Sep 2017 21:05

He is the first rider to make the Tour-Vuelta double. Congrats!
As spanish, it is a pride a rider like him honoures the Vuelta that way, he even this time trained in altittude before la Vuelta.
Nice to heard him want to ride till 40. For sure he will get lot of important races, but people as Quintana, Landa or Doumoulin will be very difficult rivals.
User avatar Taxus4a
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,871
Joined: 12 Aug 2012 18:48
Location: Castilla

11 Sep 2017 21:14

So Hinault is calling for him to do the Giro next year already. I actually agree.
User avatar jsem94
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,153
Joined: 05 Oct 2010 18:24
Location: Örebro, Sweden

Re:

11 Sep 2017 21:18

jsem94 wrote:So Hinault is calling for him to do the Giro next year already. I actually agree.


He can wait for that, except a very good route for him as this year one.
User avatar Taxus4a
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,871
Joined: 12 Aug 2012 18:48
Location: Castilla

Re:

12 Sep 2017 03:49

jsem94 wrote:So Hinault is calling for him to do the Giro next year already. I actually agree.


I don't see Froome winning the Giro. He will have a chance next year, but I think he will go for a 5th Tour.

If he wins a 5th Tour, then he will go for a 6th, for the record. After that he would be 35 when he goes to the Giro.

If he doesn't win the Tour next year then he can try for the Giro at age 34. But a loss in the Tour would suggest some decline, which will have only increased by the following season. Froome isn't that far ahead of his opposition. He 'only' gained one minute on his rivals in the long time trial in the Vuelta. That means that even with 2 long time trials his advantage might only be 2-3 minutes (against riders not named Tom), and he cannot climb with the best forever.

But anyway, whatever Froome does next season, he'll be accused of taking the easy option. If he skips the Giro then some will be disappointed that he is playing it safe. If he does the Giro, then he is avoiding Dumoulin!

As for Froome being behind GVA on the points for this season :confused:
User avatar gregrowlerson
Member
 
Posts: 1,679
Joined: 06 Aug 2010 05:46

Re: Re:

12 Sep 2017 07:29

Ruby United wrote:
Red Rick wrote:
Ruby United wrote:
Jagartrott wrote:OK Del, let's rephrase it as 'participate and be competitive in more than 3.5 WT races' (I'll give Cadel's race 0.5, and that's just because I'm generous). Point is, winning the World Tour should award riders that are competitive throughout the year - like Sagan, Valverde, etc. If Froome would like to win it, he'd have to focus on more than very few races - and that's how it should be IMO.


I agree with you that that's how it should be, but at the same time it is also true that the system is detrimental to climbers and GT specialists. Only riders who can also race one day races, such as Valverde, Purito, GVA and Sagan can win the WT rankings. Even Wiggins in his 2012 year (where he won the Tour, Olympics TT, Paris Nice, Tour of Romandy, Criterium du Dauphine, etc) didn't win it.

Whilst I think that it is fair because versatility and consistency should be rewarded, at the same time the winner of GT's get way too little points compared to some of the points dished out in several one day races.

Wiggins got beaten by another GT rider


You clearly didn't read my post properly.
I highlighted the bit concerned for you.

3 of last year's top 5 were GT riders. Valverde finished 4th, presumably based significantly on the strength of his GT performances.

It's surely a good thing that the WT rewards riders who don't just specialize in one road racing discipline. Ok, it has been won by a lot of classics specialists in the past, but those classics riders tend to also pick up stage wins when they ride GTs, whereas a lot of GT riders tend to not ride classics at all.
Leinster
Junior Member
 
Posts: 258
Joined: 10 Jun 2017 06:44

12 Sep 2017 08:06

The big thing about aiming for the Giro next year is it gives him the chance to hold all three GT's at once. That would be a massive deal. Huge risk, but I would be surprised if they're not giving it serious consideration. The whole Giro circus starting in Israel would put many off.
barmaher
Member
 
Posts: 1,676
Joined: 02 Oct 2011 21:04

Re: Re:

12 Sep 2017 09:16

gregrowlerson wrote:
jsem94 wrote:So Hinault is calling for him to do the Giro next year already. I actually agree.


I don't see Froome winning the Giro. He will have a chance next year, but I think he will go for a 5th Tour.

If he wins a 5th Tour, then he will go for a 6th, for the record. After that he would be 35 when he goes to the Giro.

If he doesn't win the Tour next year then he can try for the Giro at age 34. But a loss in the Tour would suggest some decline, which will have only increased by the following season. Froome isn't that far ahead of his opposition. He 'only' gained one minute on his rivals in the long time trial in the Vuelta. That means that even with 2 long time trials his advantage might only be 2-3 minutes (against riders not named Tom), and he cannot climb with the best forever.

But anyway, whatever Froome does next season, he'll be accused of taking the easy option. If he skips the Giro then some will be disappointed that he is playing it safe. If he does the Giro, then he is avoiding Dumoulin!

As for Froome being behind GVA on the points for this season :confused:


I agree he won't risk a possible fifth Tour and he likes riding the Vuelta. If he wins the Tour he would take a podium at the Vuelta anyway. He has already done the Tour/Vuelta double so that box is already ticked.
movingtarget
Veteran
 
Posts: 7,845
Joined: 05 Aug 2009 08:54

Re: Chris Froome Discussion Thread.

12 Sep 2017 10:20

I really don't care about Il Giro.The race definitely doesn't suit him at all because of the weather.Adding another TDF or Vuelta to his legacy would be amazing.
On another note that TT in Bergen is a chance of a lifetime and he should take it.His chances will be low to win it but is worth a try.
User avatar DBotero
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,220
Joined: 14 Mar 2015 14:22

12 Sep 2017 12:48

I'm quite sure he'll go all in for the 5th Tour win next year. Whether he will skip the Vuelta after that and does the Giro and Tour in 2019 probably depends on how he performs at the Tour 2018. How much stronger he will be in the Tour (compared to this year) due to only concentrating on it will determine whether he wins that race or not as it is very unlikely there will be such a low level Tour again next year.

Imo, he has been in slow decline in last year or two. Differences between 2015 and 16 can be explained away with having a bigger focus on Vuelta in 2016. On the other hand while the focus and build up was very similar in 2016 and 17, he was certainly weaker this year at both the Tour and the Vuelta. First week of the Vuelta muddied the waters somewhat, but the level he showed in 2nd and 3rd week was singificantly lower than last year.
All that without having the olympics in between

His own completeness as a rider and the strenght of his team has meant he has been able to hide and manage his decline better than most, specially those who depend on big climbing perfomances to win races. That's also the reason why he will be the biggest favourite at the Tour next year regardless of what he does or does not beforehand.
User avatar Põhja Konn
Member
 
Posts: 397
Joined: 01 Sep 2012 17:09

12 Sep 2017 12:51

Looking back, I seriously think Froome would have done the Tour-Vuelta double back in 2015 if he hadn't crashed out, just to add crashing uphill to 'not having leadership', 'poor time trial', 'formigal', 'fatigue from tour' to his reasons for not winning the Vuelta in each of his previous participations
User avatar PremierAndrew
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,522
Joined: 09 May 2014 18:47

13 Sep 2017 02:06

Image
Skyline Drive
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPjM6rZ4pN0
_____________________________________________________________________________
Canton Ave Climb
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C90ZPlbEfmU
User avatar Jspear
Veteran
 
Posts: 6,072
Joined: 23 Feb 2014 03:50
Location: N. VA, USA

Re: Re:

13 Sep 2017 18:31

TMP402 wrote:
Pricey_sky wrote:
Amazinmets87 wrote:
TMP402 wrote:
Amazinmets87 wrote:Congrats to Froome.

I have a question: Which rider has the most GT victories from age 33 onwards?


Joop Zoetemelk and Tony Rominger both had two, off the top of my head.

So, based off history we can say Froome's window is closing rapidly


I'd say looking at this years performances maybe 2 more years, so go all out for Tour number 5 next year and then I'd be surprised if he doesn't give the Giro a shot in 2019.


Well, would you rather win all three GTs or win an (officially) record-breaking number of Tours? If it were me I'd go for Tour-Vuelta in 2018 (but Vuelta as an afterthought, not like this season was seemingly planned), Tour 2019, and THEN Giro. Even if quite past his best he could win the Giro if the field and route are favourable to him

I totally agree with your proposed schedule. Maybe ride Vuelta 2018 as a SKY super-dom/plan B.
Then skipping Vuelta in 2019 to target TTT and maybe ITT at Yorkshire Worlds. Finally Giro and
Olympic ITT in 2020. But keep the Tour as the primary focus in both 2018 and 2019.
User avatar oldcrank
Member
 
Posts: 1,446
Joined: 24 Jul 2009 07:16

PreviousNext

Return to Professional road racing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AQETUYIOI, Axel Hangleck, Dr. Watson, Google [Bot], hazaran, PunchingRouleur, Richeypen, shalgo, wansteadimp and 41 guests

Back to top