Log in:  

Register

2020 Tokyo Olympics - road race course

A place to discuss all things related to current professional road races. Here, you can also touch on the latest news relating to professional road racing. A doping discussion free forum.

Moderators: Eshnar, Irondan, King Boonen, Red Rick, Pricey_sky

2020 Tokyo Olympics - road race course

09 Aug 2018 10:28

So I couldn't find another thread containing this (though pardon my inability to search properly if that isn't the case). The courses for the the men's and women's road races have been published. Profiles for them can be found here: http://www.uci.ch/pressreleases/tokyo-2020-challenging-cycling-road-race-courses-revealed/

The profile for men's road race looks quite challenging - total elevation is 4865 metres!
Image
User avatar infeXio
Member
 
Posts: 1,726
Joined: 26 Nov 2011 17:15
Location: Denmark

09 Aug 2018 10:39

I really like the men's course, we could be in for fireworks and at least as hard and good race as in Rio.

I wonder about the length and gradients of Fuji and especially Mikuni, that looks like a really leg breaker.
Edit: Fuji is 14,3 km and only 6% while Mikuni is 6,5 km and 10,6%, basically a Mende on top of Mende (Croix Neuve). Thats a pretty scary climb, but I fear then the race will be ridden pretty conservatively up until that point since Fuji isn't that hard.
"Es el mejor con y sin"
WORLD CHAMPION
User avatar Valv.Piti
Veteran
 
Posts: 9,590
Joined: 03 Aug 2015 00:00
Location: Dinamarca, Aalborg

09 Aug 2018 11:13

...and another major race where all of the most exciting obstacles, that draw all of the pre-race hype, are excised from the women's race. It's becoming too much of a pattern to be coincidence. It's like they're afraid of giving women equal chance to make the race.
User avatar Libertine Seguros
Veteran
 
Posts: 19,742
Joined: 20 Feb 2010 11:54
Location: Land of Saíz

09 Aug 2018 11:14

Image
FilipeFD
Junior Member
 
Posts: 113
Joined: 30 Dec 2015 17:20
Location: Portugal

09 Aug 2018 11:16

Last edited by FilipeFD on 09 Aug 2018 11:20, edited 1 time in total.
FilipeFD
Junior Member
 
Posts: 113
Joined: 30 Dec 2015 17:20
Location: Portugal

09 Aug 2018 11:16

Not a huge fan of this one - it just looks too hard for most of the best one day racers in the world. The Olympics is such a rare event that it should give opportunities to both cobbled and Ardennes specialists imo - even if its always going to slightly favour one type of rider over the other. Rio was on the limit, but ultimately justified itself with GVA producing the ride of a century.

This is just like a very hard Lombardia. 5,000m of climbing is way too much.
User avatar DFA123
Veteran
 
Posts: 6,363
Joined: 07 Nov 2010 16:00
Location: Valencia

09 Aug 2018 11:20

Björg Lambrecht will win this bike race.
User avatar Squire
Member
 
Posts: 1,322
Joined: 28 Dec 2010 23:39
Location: Shanghai

09 Aug 2018 12:20

Meh
User avatar jsem94
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,405
Joined: 05 Oct 2010 18:24
Location: Örebro, Sweden

09 Aug 2018 12:47

Geraint Thomas to win this race as well.
Image Quack!
User avatar Lequack
Member
 
Posts: 786
Joined: 10 Jul 2014 08:26

09 Aug 2018 12:55

The women's course is one of the worst ever drawn. This is so laughable by now.
mosh1992
Junior Member
 
Posts: 57
Joined: 12 Mar 2017 14:27

09 Aug 2018 12:56

I don't mind course like this, but didn't we a have one for climbers in Rio?
Lance Armstrong
Member
 
Posts: 772
Joined: 10 Mar 2009 14:25

Re:

09 Aug 2018 13:18

DFA123 wrote:Not a huge fan of this one - it just looks too hard for most of the best one day racers in the world. The Olympics is such a rare event that it should give opportunities to both cobbled and Ardennes specialists imo - even if its always going to slightly favour one type of rider over the other. Rio was on the limit, but ultimately justified itself with GVA producing the ride of a century.

This is just like a very hard Lombardia. 5,000m of climbing is way too much.

We thought that of Rio as well and it turned out a rider like GvA could win it. This looks harder though, but Im all for a harder race given how many rather bad WC-routes we have been served - riders like Sagan, Kristoff etc. have had their fair chances, heck even a pure sprinter like Cav should have won two golds.
"Es el mejor con y sin"
WORLD CHAMPION
User avatar Valv.Piti
Veteran
 
Posts: 9,590
Joined: 03 Aug 2015 00:00
Location: Dinamarca, Aalborg

09 Aug 2018 13:22

Antwan Tolhoek to win this bike race. He'll be the youngest ever winner at just 14 yo
User avatar Dekker_Tifosi
Veteran
 
Posts: 24,047
Joined: 13 Mar 2009 23:52
Location: Roermond, the Netherlands

Re:

09 Aug 2018 13:56

mosh1992 wrote:The women's course is one of the worst ever drawn. This is so laughable by now.

I agree--the women's course is a travesty.
shalgo
Member
 
Posts: 1,495
Joined: 11 Aug 2010 13:57
Location: Pale Blue Dot

09 Aug 2018 14:03

I can’t even begin to understand why they would set out to destroy any chance of the women’s race being exciting. Even taking sexist attitudes for granted, surely it is in the organisers interests that the race be watchable.
Zinoviev Letter
Veteran
 
Posts: 6,437
Joined: 18 Aug 2010 13:18

Re: 2020 Tokyo Olympics - road race course

09 Aug 2018 14:05

So Nibali will ride till 2020? Great news :D
In all seriousness though, him winning this after what happened in rio would be absolutely amazing. It will be difficult though as the last big climb is far away from the finish and there isn't much terrain to make the race hard early which means it will be hard for an attack on that climb to stick. For that reason I think Sagan has a good chance to win this. He'll certainly be dropped at some point but if the pace isn't high all the way to the finish he can come back and win in a sprint. Then again nobody will work with Sagan in the group. The more I think about it I'd say this will be won by an outsider with an opportunistic attack.
User avatar Gigs_98
Veteran
 
Posts: 6,772
Joined: 18 Feb 2015 18:36
Location: Austria

Re:

09 Aug 2018 17:20

Zinoviev Letter wrote:I can’t even begin to understand why they would set out to destroy any chance of the women’s race being exciting. Even taking sexist attitudes for granted, surely it is in the organisers interests that the race be watchable.

It's hard sometimes not to feel that the problem is that the women putting on races that people are interested in has necessitated a lot more work developing and administering women's cycling. After all, when they've been given equally interesting courses to the men they've typically delivered equally interesting races. At many recent World Championships and places like Beijing as well where circuits were the order of the day, meaning the women's and men's courses were essentially the same but with the women doing fewer laps, we've seen similar quality of races developed by those courses. But somehow, suddenly, there is a fad for excising the most interesting and selective part of the men's race from the women's race, and bizarrely it coincides with the introduction of a stronger, more developed women's cycling scene - which completely removes the potential argument about depth of péloton and professionalism, because the women have shown themselves to be more than capable of handling some of the toughest obstacles out there. Annemiek van Vleuten set a Zoncolan time that would have put her in the top 40 in the stage Froome won earlier this season, for example, and the women have long been handling the Koppenberg and the Mur de Huy. Hell, compare the rather tedious stage 10 of the Tour de France, with the men having two days' more racing in the Alps to save their legs for, to the women's standalone event going hell for leather over the Romme and Colombière and the epic chasedown with van Vleuten hunting van der Breggen right to the line.

But now, apparently, they can't do the same course as the men, despite being deigned able to do that at a point where the women's péloton was far less professional than it is now. World and Olympic courses are moving away from the circuits model toward point-to-point races with finishing circuits, and one-off obstacles designed to create special attraction intrigue. Except, invariably thus far, those one-off obstacles have been withheld from the women. They didn't get to race in the desert in Doha, the only part of the race that produced any selectivity. They just got a pan-flat city centre course of the same tedious type they're already given by Ride London (another race which gives the men an interesting, potentially selective course but the women a criterium), ASO at the time (thankfully La Course has branched out, though it's still somewhat insulting as a one-day race and how it's run roughshod over established races in the calendar) and Unipublic. They don't get to do Gramartboden in Innsbruck, so they miss out on the one thing that people are building up the hype to pre-race. They don't get to do any of the actually selective obstacles in Tokyo even though, plausibly, they could include the Mikuni Pass loop and still be under the 160km max if they didn't do bonus loops of the circuit around the Speedway.

So why is it that, when the professionalism of the women's péloton is increasing, the average and maximum distances they race are increasing (which, with the men's races tending toward shorter stages in recent years, means the gap between the average men's and women's race in distance is at the lowest it's ever been as of late) and more coverage of women's cycling is available than ever before, at those biggest races of the year, those special races where the casual fan who isn't dedicated enough (and I don't necessarily blame them, it often takes plenty of dedication to closely follow women's cycling) to seek out the live streams for the final day of the Emakumeen Bira or the GP Vårgårda, or the newcomer fan who hasn't been aware of the availability of women's cycling, can watch and be absorbed in the women's racing, are they actively being sabotaged? They've historically put on as good a show as the men when given equal opportunity to make the race, so why are they being denied that?

I really don't care to analyse the possibilities of the men's race. I don't care how good the parcours is. This is just absolute horse**** from both the route designers and whatever the authority that sanctioned it is, and every rider, every director, every journalist and every fan of women's cycling ought to be absolutely disgusted with them.
User avatar Libertine Seguros
Veteran
 
Posts: 19,742
Joined: 20 Feb 2010 11:54
Location: Land of Saíz

Re: Re:

09 Aug 2018 18:29

Valv.Piti wrote:
DFA123 wrote:Not a huge fan of this one - it just looks too hard for most of the best one day racers in the world. The Olympics is such a rare event that it should give opportunities to both cobbled and Ardennes specialists imo - even if its always going to slightly favour one type of rider over the other. Rio was on the limit, but ultimately justified itself with GVA producing the ride of a century.

This is just like a very hard Lombardia. 5,000m of climbing is way too much.

We thought that of Rio as well and it turned out a rider like GvA could win it. This looks harder though, but Im all for a harder race given how many rather bad WC-routes we have been served - riders like Sagan, Kristoff etc. have had their fair chances, heck even a pure sprinter like Cav should have won two golds.

I think this one has well over 1,000m more climbing than Rio, so will probably be too hard even for riders like Kwiatkowski, let alone GVA or Sagan. And its got much longer climbs, which will probably turn it into an aerobic snoozefest, with a GB train dropping nearly all the exciting anaerobic riders.

I agree that big races have catered too much for the sprinters in recent years, but that's the fault of picking worlds venues with poor terrain where they couldnt do a whole lot else. No need to go too far the other way when they could have just put on a nice balanced course.
User avatar DFA123
Veteran
 
Posts: 6,363
Joined: 07 Nov 2010 16:00
Location: Valencia

Re: Re:

09 Aug 2018 18:46

DFA123 wrote:
Valv.Piti wrote:
DFA123 wrote:Not a huge fan of this one - it just looks too hard for most of the best one day racers in the world. The Olympics is such a rare event that it should give opportunities to both cobbled and Ardennes specialists imo - even if its always going to slightly favour one type of rider over the other. Rio was on the limit, but ultimately justified itself with GVA producing the ride of a century.

This is just like a very hard Lombardia. 5,000m of climbing is way too much.

We thought that of Rio as well and it turned out a rider like GvA could win it. This looks harder though, but Im all for a harder race given how many rather bad WC-routes we have been served - riders like Sagan, Kristoff etc. have had their fair chances, heck even a pure sprinter like Cav should have won two golds.

I think this one has well over 1,000m more climbing than Rio, so will probably be too hard even for riders like Kwiatkowski, let alone GVA or Sagan. And its got much longer climbs, which will probably turn it into an aerobic snoozefest, with a GB train dropping nearly all the exciting anaerobic riders.

I agree that big races have catered too much for the sprinters in recent years, but that's the fault of picking worlds venues with poor terrain where they couldnt do a whole lot else. No need to go too far the other way when they could have just put on a nice balanced course.

Olympic teams are smaller which makes it a lot harder to control. Besides that, it's not like GB is that much better than other teams anyway. GB isn't sky after all.
User avatar Gigs_98
Veteran
 
Posts: 6,772
Joined: 18 Feb 2015 18:36
Location: Austria

09 Aug 2018 19:42

Olympic teams are 5 men for some and less for other countries. Also anyone who races the ITT MUST race the road race at the Olympics. Spain could have an interesting team. Valverde has said he wants one more shot and I can't see how Spain doesn't take Landa and Soler.
User avatar Koronin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,951
Joined: 14 Oct 2017 01:42
Location: North Carolina, USA

Next

Return to Professional road racing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: archa55, dirkprovin, Gigs_98, Google Adsense [Bot], Rollthedice, The Tristero and 40 guests

Back to top