Upper-body training for cyclists

[CheckMyPecs]

This is pathetic.





I've got a big upper body and I manage to win a few races here and there every season. Sure, I win at the amateur level, but blokes with better genetics than mine should be able to do the same in pro races.

[Jancouver]

Why? Because it is all about power to weight ratio and upper body muscles are just an extra weight

[CheckMyPecs]

Why? Because it is all about power to weight ratio and upper body muscles are just an extra weight

It's better to lose a few seconds than to lose your dignity.

[MikeTichondrius]

Why? Because it is all about power to weight ratio and upper body muscles are just an extra weight

It's better to lose a few seconds than to lose your dignity.

Username coherent with argument.

[CheckMyPecs]

Why? Because it is all about power to weight ratio and upper body muscles are just an extra weight

It's better to lose a few seconds than to lose your dignity.

Username coherent with argument.

I can think of many reasons why cyclists should train their upper bodies to boost their performance:

*stronger forearms mean cyclists can grip their handlebar better and thus prevent falls
*stronger abs and core muscles protect the spine and help prevent back injuries

etc.

[DFA123]

Why? Because it is all about power to weight ratio and upper body muscles are just an extra weight

It's better to lose a few seconds than to lose your dignity.

Username coherent with argument.

I can think of many reasons why cyclists should train their upper bodies to boost their performance:

*stronger forearms mean cyclists can grip their handlebar better and thus prevent falls
*stronger abs and core muscles protect the spine and help prevent back injuries

etc.

Dude

Probably time to call it a night.

[CheckMyPecs]

Case in point: Peter Sagan in this year's Paris-Roubaix.

[Flat Out]

If you think they neglect core workouts you are wrong.
Anyway, Armstrong was a triathlete, coming from swimming with a ogood upper body development. Not necessary. They have to ride their bikes, not lift them

[CheckMyPecs]

If you think they neglect core workouts you are wrong.
Anyway, Armstrong was a triathlete, coming from swimming with a ogood upper body development. Not necessary. They have to ride their bikes, not lift them

Honest to God, I can't look at these pictures of Brajkovic and Feillu and believe these guys train their core.

[jsem94]

Classics riders are different though and can afford slightly more muscle mass because they don't have to climb as much.

And yes, a stronger core and more musculature helps prevent bone injuries. The reason cyclists break so many bones when they fall is partly because there's no muscle to protect them. But it doesn't help them climb faster, so they'll take the risk knowing that when they fall they will break their collarbone just to have a higher power/weight ratio.

It's pretty simple really. Sumo wrestlers and road race cyclists are two polar opposites of the spectrum of sportsmen in terms of body shape. Cyclists are pretty repulsive, but that's not the point.

[RedheadDane]

You rarely need your arms in order to win a bike race.

Of course it's a bit more complicated than that... sprinters and classic specialists tend to have stronger upper-bodies than climbers.

[Cance > TheRest]

Why? Because it is all about power to weight ratio and upper body muscles are just an extra weight

It's better to lose a few seconds than to lose your dignity.

Username coherent with argument.

I can think of many reasons why cyclists should train their upper bodies to boost their performance:

*stronger forearms mean cyclists can grip their handlebar better and thus prevent falls
*stronger abs and core muscles protect the spine and help prevent back injuries

etc.

Many of the best bike handlers and descenders in the peloton are actually climbers with skinny arms.

[jsem94]

But even Greipel who call the Gorilla isn't actually all the big, it's just by cycling standards. It's not like he has the upper body of a swimmer. Not even close.

[CheckMyPecs]

Look at what I found (apparently written by a doctor):

In my experience, many cyclists are riding bikes that are too big for them and many cyclists lack proper flexibility and/or their core strength is lacking. Take the time and have your bike fitted to your body. Also, back pain can arise from anatomical causes like leg length discrepancy or misalignment of your spine.

http://www.active.com/cycling/articles/how-to-avoid-lower-back-pain-while-cycling

[Brullnux]

Kittel seems pretty big, even for a normal person. Sagan has a pretty slim upper body but it isn't skinny, just slim. I mean, bones aren't visible.

[CheckMyPecs]

Another occasion when Lance's upper body saved the day:

[ILovecycling]

IMO if you have a stronger arms its easier to ride off the saddle for a long period of time (otoh AC doesnt support this theory )

[Cance > TheRest]

IMO if you have a stronger arms its easier to ride off the saddle for a long period of time (otoh AC doesnt support this theory )

Think it was a GCN-episode, where Matt was riding with Alberto, asking him if he ever trained his arm muscles for "out of the saddle"-style. Alberto just looked at him like he was stupid

[RedheadDane]

Can't help but wonder why you seem to care so much about this.
Yes, pro-cyclists tend to be rather skinny.
Yes, it does look rather silly.
But... does it matter to you?

[PremierAndrew]

Why? Because it is all about power to weight ratio and upper body muscles are just an extra weight

It's better to lose a few seconds than to lose your dignity.

Your dignity has nothing to do with how your upper body looks. The majority of people work out because they are insecure about themselves/their bodies, and gain self-esteem by making themselves stronger, often in the hope of becoming more attractive to the opposite sex (or the same sex for that matter)

Road and track cyclists have absolutely nothing to gain from gaining muscle on their upper body (except maybe to a very limited extent the cobbles specialists)