Log in:  

Register

Member Suspension Appreciation/Depreciation Thread

Drop in, give us some feedback and talk to the team

Moderator: Irondan

Re: Re:

06 Mar 2017 19:46

blackcat wrote:
Dazed and Confused wrote:It was a ridiculous comment by delgados.
Welcome back kitty cat.


actually, it was an inside joke by the delgados and I. nothing more.

I hate having caveats refraining from #Poe's_law.

see, even if it was serious-non serious. I would have taken it in the best manner. I know I rile folks. the delgados is not one of those.

I know folks report my posts, but I don't play be their rules. sorry.

I know I cause a headache for moderators. sorry also.

well why don't you mitigate your behaviour blackcat?

well, that aint the way I roll, and I reckon a profit-loss analysis make it worth accepting the few missteps I have made.

Red Lobster. Crawfish Poes Law.
User avatar Semper Fidelis
Veteran
 
Posts: 8,307
Joined: 07 Dec 2010 15:53
Location: New Orleans

Re: Re:

06 Mar 2017 22:11

Semper Fidelis wrote:
blackcat wrote:
Dazed and Confused wrote:It was a ridiculous comment by delgados.
Welcome back kitty cat.


actually, it was an inside joke by the delgados and I. nothing more.

I hate having caveats refraining from #Poe's_law.

see, even if it was serious-non serious. I would have taken it in the best manner. I know I rile folks. the delgados is not one of those.

I know folks report my posts, but I don't play be their rules. sorry.

I know I cause a headache for moderators. sorry also.

well why don't you mitigate your behaviour blackcat?

well, that aint the way I roll, and I reckon a profit-loss analysis make it worth accepting the few missteps I have made.

Red Lobster. Crawfish Poes Law.


yep, #Poe's_law ftw

eponymousE ftw.
"Hitler … didn't even sink to using chemical weapons."
User avatar blackcat
Veteran
 
Posts: 12,232
Joined: 13 Mar 2009 19:20

Re: Re:

07 Mar 2017 14:08

blackcat wrote:
Irondan wrote:
blackcat wrote:
sniper wrote:Wheels are coming off now.

Yes it's the tip of the iceberg.
Aicar, microdosing EPO, gummibears, HGH, motirized wheels, full Monty. From BC track to road and back. Staff including soigneurs and mechanics, all with one goal. Cheat and win.


Gillan1967 well done for digging that up.
Hilarious.

Walsh doing everything to safe face. Not gonna work.


you forget GW-501516 and lipotropin

it will be funnier when the knighthoods get revoked. if that is the technical name.

then can someone please do me a favour and bring me the justice of copying/quoting all the satire posts from blackcatthirdperson where they mentioned Gordonstoun muscular christianity oxbridge rowing boat races bullingdon club harrow etc.

Because when the satire was seen in the full light of day, the moderators would never have banned me for six freekin months when I was right all along, I brought the funnies and laffs[sic]

You were not banned for:
"satire posts from blackcatthirdperson where they mentioned Gordonstoun muscular christianity oxbridge rowing boat races bullingdon club harrow etc."
But you know this already.

Your ban was for repeatedly ignoring warnings and bans about posting crude, vulgar, NSFW, and pornographic comments that have since been mostly removed.

Asking members to aggregate your comments to prove that you've been treated unfairly will not show the actual posts that you were banned for, but you know that too.

If you have a gripe or concern about being banned for six months you can post it in the "members suspension appreciation/depreciation" thread. Posting about your ban in threads other than the members app/dep thread is not permitted, per forum policy.



come on ID, I got banned because a cadre of fellow travellers reported every post I made and had a tin ear for satire and Wildean drollery. Brits! Brits with no humour gene.

The empire crew reported every post I made. I have never reported one off-colour post by anyone else.

My main aim, is to remove the muslin laid over the eyes where a non-positive piss test = clean. I seek to burn the emperor's clothes at the stake[sic/ intentional torturing metaphor].

We had it with USPS mkI at Daily Peloton with all the Lance homers. Now we have crossed the Atlantic.

I never made it personal, I sought to bring the funnies[sic].

If people thought I was malicious they have their wires crossed, I was never malicious. six months for being humorous.

This is a classic example of what I'm talking about, you get a warning for violating forum policy and you ignore it and post whatever you want anyway. I couldn't have been any more clear that if you wanted to complain about your ban you should post it in the "members app/dep" thread, yet you completely ignored that warning and posted off topic (against forum policy) in the Sky thread anyway. What you don't seem to fully grasp is that there are members out there that aren't smitten with your complete lack of respect for forum rules. :(

Blaming the "Brits" for not having a sense of humor and getting you banned is completely off base. You have no idea who reported you for what not to mention that I have told you numerous time what you were banned for.

Arriving at such a conclusion after being repeatedly told what got you banned is simply just trolling at this point.
Last edited by Irondan on 07 Mar 2017 15:08, edited 1 time in total.
Darryl Webster wrote:
"Nothing seems to blind peeps as much as patriotism does it!"
User avatar Irondan
Administrator
 
Posts: 7,536
Joined: 30 Apr 2014 02:13
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Re:

07 Mar 2017 21:42

Irondan wrote:This is a classic example of what I'm talking about, you get a warning for violating forum policy and you ignore it and post whatever you want anyway. I couldn't have been any more clear that if you wanted to complain about your ban you should post it in the "members app/dep" thread, yet you completely ignored that warning and posted off topic (against forum policy) in the Sky thread anyway. What you don't seem to fully grasp is that there are members out there that aren't smitten with your complete lack of respect for forum rules. :(

Blaming the "Brits" for not having a sense of humor and getting you banned is completely off base. You have no idea who reported you for what not to mention that I have told you numerous time what you were banned for.

Arriving at such a conclusion after being repeatedly told what got you banned is simply just trolling at this point.


significant proportion of my posts were bringing a level of analysis not offered on the forum.
"Hitler … didn't even sink to using chemical weapons."
User avatar blackcat
Veteran
 
Posts: 12,232
Joined: 13 Mar 2009 19:20

Re: Re:

07 Mar 2017 21:55

blackcat wrote:
Irondan wrote:This is a classic example of what I'm talking about, you get a warning for violating forum policy and you ignore it and post whatever you want anyway. I couldn't have been any more clear that if you wanted to complain about your ban you should post it in the "members app/dep" thread, yet you completely ignored that warning and posted off topic (against forum policy) in the Sky thread anyway. What you don't seem to fully grasp is that there are members out there that aren't smitten with your complete lack of respect for forum rules. :(

Blaming the "Brits" for not having a sense of humor and getting you banned is completely off base. You have no idea who reported you for what not to mention that I have told you numerous time what you were banned for.

Arriving at such a conclusion after being repeatedly told what got you banned is simply just trolling at this point.


significant proportion of my posts were bringing a level of analysis not offered on the forum.

I have no idea what that's supposed to mean...
Darryl Webster wrote:
"Nothing seems to blind peeps as much as patriotism does it!"
User avatar Irondan
Administrator
 
Posts: 7,536
Joined: 30 Apr 2014 02:13
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Re:

08 Mar 2017 13:22

Irondan wrote:
blackcat wrote:
Irondan wrote:This is a classic example of what I'm talking about, you get a warning for violating forum policy and you ignore it and post whatever you want anyway. I couldn't have been any more clear that if you wanted to complain about your ban you should post it in the "members app/dep" thread, yet you completely ignored that warning and posted off topic (against forum policy) in the Sky thread anyway. What you don't seem to fully grasp is that there are members out there that aren't smitten with your complete lack of respect for forum rules. :(

Blaming the "Brits" for not having a sense of humor and getting you banned is completely off base. You have no idea who reported you for what not to mention that I have told you numerous time what you were banned for.

Arriving at such a conclusion after being repeatedly told what got you banned is simply just trolling at this point.


significant proportion of my posts were bringing a level of analysis not offered on the forum.

I have no idea what that's supposed to mean...


Blackcat is the Dog. End of. Meaning is meaningless #poeslaw :cool:

:D
User avatar Benotti69
Veteran
 
Posts: 19,289
Joined: 26 May 2010 09:09

Re: Re:

08 Mar 2017 13:26

Benotti69 wrote:
Irondan wrote:
blackcat wrote:
Irondan wrote:This is a classic example of what I'm talking about, you get a warning for violating forum policy and you ignore it and post whatever you want anyway. I couldn't have been any more clear that if you wanted to complain about your ban you should post it in the "members app/dep" thread, yet you completely ignored that warning and posted off topic (against forum policy) in the Sky thread anyway. What you don't seem to fully grasp is that there are members out there that aren't smitten with your complete lack of respect for forum rules. :(

Blaming the "Brits" for not having a sense of humor and getting you banned is completely off base. You have no idea who reported you for what not to mention that I have told you numerous time what you were banned for.

Arriving at such a conclusion after being repeatedly told what got you banned is simply just trolling at this point.


significant proportion of my posts were bringing a level of analysis not offered on the forum.

I have no idea what that's supposed to mean...


Blackcat is the Dog. End of. Meaning is meaningless #poeslaw :cool:

:D

Thanks for clarifying? Are you saying that blackcat changed his name to blackdog.. :rolleyes:
Darryl Webster wrote:
"Nothing seems to blind peeps as much as patriotism does it!"
User avatar Irondan
Administrator
 
Posts: 7,536
Joined: 30 Apr 2014 02:13
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Re:

08 Mar 2017 18:29

Irondan wrote:Thanks for clarifying? Are you saying that blackcat changed his name to blackdog.. :rolleyes:


Dan, I may not be a moderator, but I am the boss.
"Hitler … didn't even sink to using chemical weapons."
User avatar blackcat
Veteran
 
Posts: 12,232
Joined: 13 Mar 2009 19:20

Re: Re:

08 Mar 2017 18:46

blackcat wrote:
Irondan wrote:Thanks for clarifying? Are you saying that blackcat changed his name to blackdog.. :rolleyes:


Dan, I may not be a moderator, but I am the boss.

Okay blackcat, whatever you say...
Darryl Webster wrote:
"Nothing seems to blind peeps as much as patriotism does it!"
User avatar Irondan
Administrator
 
Posts: 7,536
Joined: 30 Apr 2014 02:13
Location: Seattle, WA

08 Mar 2017 18:53

#FreeMiburo
User avatar Valv.Piti
Moderator
 
Posts: 8,726
Joined: 03 Aug 2015 00:00
Location: Dinamarca, Aalborg

Re:

08 Mar 2017 19:43

Valv.Piti wrote:#FreeMiburo

There are many reasons why that will never happen.
Darryl Webster wrote:
"Nothing seems to blind peeps as much as patriotism does it!"
User avatar Irondan
Administrator
 
Posts: 7,536
Joined: 30 Apr 2014 02:13
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Re:

08 Mar 2017 21:15

Irondan wrote:
Valv.Piti wrote:#FreeMiburo

There are many reasons why that will never happen.

I know, I know, but I still miss him during the Contador-season.
User avatar Valv.Piti
Moderator
 
Posts: 8,726
Joined: 03 Aug 2015 00:00
Location: Dinamarca, Aalborg

10 Mar 2017 19:53

Are posters out to get sniper banned?

Plenty of others post similar content that comes across more as obfuscating rather than discussion.

Heck one well known poster just posts nothing but derogatory snide uppity posts attacking posters yet nowt! There are others that constantly play the man and not the ball.
User avatar Benotti69
Veteran
 
Posts: 19,289
Joined: 26 May 2010 09:09

Re:

10 Mar 2017 20:48

Benotti69 wrote:Are posters out to get sniper banned?

Plenty of others post similar content that comes across more as obfuscating rather than discussion.

Heck one well known poster just posts nothing but derogatory snide uppity posts attacking posters yet nowt! There are others that constantly play the man and not the ball.

No, nobody is out to get sniper banned, at least in the past week anyway. All I can say is that you should report the comments that you see as violating forum policy.
Darryl Webster wrote:
"Nothing seems to blind peeps as much as patriotism does it!"
User avatar Irondan
Administrator
 
Posts: 7,536
Joined: 30 Apr 2014 02:13
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Re:

10 Mar 2017 21:18

Irondan wrote:
Benotti69 wrote:Are posters out to get sniper banned?

Plenty of others post similar content that comes across more as obfuscating rather than discussion.

Heck one well known poster just posts nothing but derogatory snide uppity posts attacking posters yet nowt! There are others that constantly play the man and not the ball.

No, nobody is out to get sniper banned, at least in the past week anyway. All I can say is that you should report the comments that you see as violating forum policy.


Tried that. He never got banned. He is constant.

Did not see anything in snipers posts that imo warranted a ban, but then i am not a mod.

Not seen any sky bots get banned either! Not sure why......
User avatar Benotti69
Veteran
 
Posts: 19,289
Joined: 26 May 2010 09:09

Re: Re:

10 Mar 2017 21:44

Benotti69 wrote:
Irondan wrote:
Benotti69 wrote:Are posters out to get sniper banned?

Plenty of others post similar content that comes across more as obfuscating rather than discussion.

Heck one well known poster just posts nothing but derogatory snide uppity posts attacking posters yet nowt! There are others that constantly play the man and not the ball.

No, nobody is out to get sniper banned, at least in the past week anyway. All I can say is that you should report the comments that you see as violating forum policy.


Tried that. He never got banned. He is constant.

Did not see anything in snipers posts that imo warranted a ban, but then i am not a mod.

Not seen any sky bots get banned either! Not sure why......

Banning people is not the only thing that mods do, sometimes we warn members and sometimes we ban them, other times we simply don't feel that the comment warrants any action.
Darryl Webster wrote:
"Nothing seems to blind peeps as much as patriotism does it!"
User avatar Irondan
Administrator
 
Posts: 7,536
Joined: 30 Apr 2014 02:13
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Re:

11 Mar 2017 11:55

Irondan wrote:
Benotti69 wrote:
Irondan wrote:
Benotti69 wrote:Are posters out to get sniper banned?

Plenty of others post similar content that comes across more as obfuscating rather than discussion.

Heck one well known poster just posts nothing but derogatory snide uppity posts attacking posters yet nowt! There are others that constantly play the man and not the ball.

No, nobody is out to get sniper banned, at least in the past week anyway. All I can say is that you should report the comments that you see as violating forum policy.


Tried that. He never got banned. He is constant.

Did not see anything in snipers posts that imo warranted a ban, but then i am not a mod.

Not seen any sky bots get banned either! Not sure why......

Banning people is not the only thing that mods do, sometimes we warn members and sometimes we ban them, other times we simply don't feel that the comment warrants any action.

i can vouch for Dan, he was relegated, no strikethru
<strikethru>relegated</strikethru> if the <strikethru> code existed on the forum.

I can vouch for Dan, he was delegated the , that was a malaprop before, with relegated, I meant to use delegated

Dan was delegated the worst role for the moderators, I have received about a dozen very pleasant personal messages warning me of my behaviour.

I can vouch for Dan.

if me vouchsafing for ferrous and alliterationz was worth a dime
"Hitler … didn't even sink to using chemical weapons."
User avatar blackcat
Veteran
 
Posts: 12,232
Joined: 13 Mar 2009 19:20

Re: Re:

11 Mar 2017 14:58

Irondan wrote:
Benotti69 wrote:
Irondan wrote:
Benotti69 wrote:Are posters out to get sniper banned?

Plenty of others post similar content that comes across more as obfuscating rather than discussion.

Heck one well known poster just posts nothing but derogatory snide uppity posts attacking posters yet nowt! There are others that constantly play the man and not the ball.

No, nobody is out to get sniper banned, at least in the past week anyway. All I can say is that you should report the comments that you see as violating forum policy.


Tried that. He never got banned. He is constant.

Did not see anything in snipers posts that imo warranted a ban, but then i am not a mod.

Not seen any sky bots get banned either! Not sure why......


Banning people is not the only thing that mods do, sometimes we warn members and sometimes we ban them, other times we simply don't feel that the comment warrants any action.


Wasn't attacking mods, more taking a pop at some who see Sniper's consistent questioning and probing as a problem. I like that he questions everything. Some just dont like their heroes questioned.

Cheers
User avatar Benotti69
Veteran
 
Posts: 19,289
Joined: 26 May 2010 09:09

11 Mar 2017 15:16

I'd have to second that. Sniper is always highly civil and on topic in his interactions. Maybe some sensibilities are more delicate than others and dislike how he turns an argument.
aphronesis
Veteran
 
Posts: 6,309
Joined: 30 Jul 2011 16:47
Location: Bed-Stuy

Re: Re:

11 Mar 2017 18:13

Benotti69 wrote:Wasn't attacking mods, more taking a pop at some who see Sniper's consistent questioning and probing as a problem. I like that he questions everything. Some just dont like their heroes questioned.

Cheers


no one likes Emperor's clothes innit Ben.

which is why I figure I offended so many, my satire of cycling and cycling fandom... we cannot accept emperor's clothes fable, we luv our comfortable West place where we have tv n beer. and allow Armstrong to be our vicarious self.

and for that, no one ever asks themselves, have we used Armstrong? Yes, he achieved material wealth, and groupies on tap to give him sex and peccadilloes. But were we using Lance, is this relationship actually inverted. We only see 'money and lies'. Perhaps we lived out our humdrum existence in fantasy, and lance was part of this vicarious achievement. If we cant do it, someone else needs to do it. If it was not Lance, it would be someone else. I suppose, then has Nietzschean tangent. Lance had to do it, because we were unable to do it.
"Hitler … didn't even sink to using chemical weapons."
User avatar blackcat
Veteran
 
Posts: 12,232
Joined: 13 Mar 2009 19:20

PreviousNext

Return to About the forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

Back to top