Moderators

[Netserk]

https://i.imgur.com/hYl8gdh.jpg

Is it possible to make it so that avatars shrink when the window shrinks? It's a bit annoying that some of the larger avatars block some of the text, when you have two windows besides each other.

[Irondan]

https://i.imgur.com/hYl8gdh.jpg

Is it possible to make it so that avatars shrink when the window shrinks? It's a bit annoying that some of the larger avatars block some of the text, when you have two windows besides each other.

No, there’s no way to do that, as far as I know.

[Kokoso]

Hello moderators, what was I trolling about that it resulted in the ban? I am not aware of any trolling. Thank you for explanation.

[Irondan]

Hello moderators, what was I trolling about that it resulted in the ban? I am not aware of any trolling. Thank you for explanation.

I honestly can't remember what post or posts got you banned or what they contained. Which is the main reason why we don't normally give any further explanation "after the fact" towards a members ban. There are a few other reasons on why we don't normally talk about previous bans when a member gets back from one, with the biggest one being that the member never agrees with a mods determination, therefore, it does nothing to help the situation and usually only flames it to make things worse.

It's best to read the forum rules, know them, and post comments accordingly.

Cheers

[Kokoso]

Hello moderators, what was I trolling about that it resulted in the ban? I am not aware of any trolling. Thank you for explanation.

I honestly can't remember what post or posts got you banned or what they contained. Which is the main reason why we don't normally give any further explanation "after the fact" towards a members ban. There are a few other reasons on why we don't normally talk about previous bans when a member gets back from one, with the biggest one being that the member never agrees with a mods determination, therefore, it does nothing to help the situation and usually only flames it to make things worse.

It's best to read the forum rules, know them, and post comments accordingly.

Cheers

If I remember correctly, it was because Polish mountain climbing expedition thread where I "dared" to say nationality is important for someone (who seemed to care about nationality). It that was reason of ban, really, I disagree. Last time I got ban I've agreed more or less, so much for banned member never agrees.

[Jspear]

Hello moderators, what was I trolling about that it resulted in the ban? I am not aware of any trolling. Thank you for explanation.

I honestly can't remember what post or posts got you banned or what they contained. Which is the main reason why we don't normally give any further explanation "after the fact" towards a members ban. There are a few other reasons on why we don't normally talk about previous bans when a member gets back from one, with the biggest one being that the member never agrees with a mods determination, therefore, it does nothing to help the situation and usually only flames it to make things worse.

It's best to read the forum rules, know them, and post comments accordingly.

Cheers

If I remember correctly, it was because Polish mountain climbing expedition thread where I "dared" to say nationality is important for someone (who seemed to care about nationality). It that was reason of ban, really, I disagree. Last time I got ban I've agreed more or less, so much for banned member never agrees.

Okay so he was possibly wrong in one instance (although you only agreed more or less, so perhaps you didn't even agree then), but you're disagreeing here...you're proving his point.

[Irondan]

Hello moderators, what was I trolling about that it resulted in the ban? I am not aware of any trolling. Thank you for explanation.

I honestly can't remember what post or posts got you banned or what they contained. Which is the main reason why we don't normally give any further explanation "after the fact" towards a members ban. There are a few other reasons on why we don't normally talk about previous bans when a member gets back from one, with the biggest one being that the member never agrees with a mods determination, therefore, it does nothing to help the situation and usually only flames it to make things worse.

It's best to read the forum rules, know them, and post comments accordingly.

Cheers

If I remember correctly, it was because Polish mountain climbing expedition thread where I "dared" to say nationality is important for someone (who seemed to care about nationality). It that was reason of ban, really, I disagree. Last time I got ban I've agreed more or less, so much for banned member never agrees.

When I said that members never agree with the moderator's determinations I meant that in this thread and the old member's app/dep thread, the discussions that have taken part in the past were always a disagreement when discussing bans. I didn't mean that every member that's ever been banned disagreed with every ban. I actually didn't think that I needed to clarify that but oh well. Of course, people have agreed with their bans in the past, some of them were deliberately trolling or many other infractions that the members knew would get them banned but they did it anyway.

The point of my comment was that the members that ask moderators to explain in detail the reason why their post earned them a ban mostly ended in disagreement. Usually, I would think that the people that just went on with their lives after serving a ban probably agreed that the comment they posted to get them a ban was legit.

Either way, it's time to move on as I will not discuss this any further and you seem to be looking for some way to create an argument in which I don't have any desire to participate.

Cheers

[Dekker_Tifosi]

red is admin
green is moderator

[spetsa]

Since this is the moderators forum, I assume this is the place to ask if your services exist?

[King Boonen]

Yes, it is.

[spetsa]

Yes, it is.

Why would another member have knowledge of the contents of a "report post" comment?

[King Boonen]

Yes, it is.

Why would another member have knowledge of the contents of a "report post" comment?

I believe the only way another member would have that information is if they had access to a mod/admin account or a mod/admin has passed it on. We would not pass the information on.

[RedheadDane]

red is admin
green is moderator

Yes... we had that discussion like, a month ago.

[TheSpud]

Would like to comment on the latest bans but not allowed to ...

[Armchair cyclist]

Could somebody with authority to do so change the thread title for Kuurne Brussels Kuurne to update it to HC status. TIA

[ebandit]

Would like to comment on the latest bans but not allowed to ...

spud was the word that you were thinking of...............colourful?

or was it a phrase...'dynamic flexibility implementing rules....?'

Mark L

[TheSpud]

Would like to comment on the latest bans but not allowed to ...

spud was the word that you were thinking of...............colourful?

or was it a phrase...'dynamic flexibility implementing rules....?'

Mark L

Neither - I didn't see the infringements so cant comment on them.

Good to see you're back - you never can really leave The Clinic ...

[fmk_RoI]

Would like to comment on the latest bans but not allowed to ...

spud was the word that you were thinking of...............colourful?

or was it a phrase...'dynamic flexibility implementing rules....?'

Mark L

Neither - I didn't see the infringements so cant comment on them.

Good to see you're back - you never can really leave The Clinic ...

So even if you were allowed to comment, you couldn't?

[Kokoso]

Hello moderators, what was I trolling about that it resulted in the ban? I am not aware of any trolling. Thank you for explanation.

I honestly can't remember what post or posts got you banned or what they contained. Which is the main reason why we don't normally give any further explanation "after the fact" towards a members ban. There are a few other reasons on why we don't normally talk about previous bans when a member gets back from one, with the biggest one being that the member never agrees with a mods determination, therefore, it does nothing to help the situation and usually only flames it to make things worse.

It's best to read the forum rules, know them, and post comments accordingly.

Cheers

If I remember correctly, it was because Polish mountain climbing expedition thread where I "dared" to say nationality is important for someone (who seemed to care about nationality). It that was reason of ban, really, I disagree. Last time I got ban I've agreed more or less, so much for banned member never agrees.

Okay so he was possibly wrong in one instance (although you only agreed more or less, so perhaps you didn't even agree then), but you're disagreeing here...you're proving his point.

If you agree one time and disagree other time, you are not proving point of someone stating someone never agrees.

[Irondan]

Hello moderators, what was I trolling about that it resulted in the ban? I am not aware of any trolling. Thank you for explanation.

I honestly can't remember what post or posts got you banned or what they contained. Which is the main reason why we don't normally give any further explanation "after the fact" towards a members ban. There are a few other reasons on why we don't normally talk about previous bans when a member gets back from one, with the biggest one being that the member never agrees with a mods determination, therefore, it does nothing to help the situation and usually only flames it to make things worse.

It's best to read the forum rules, know them, and post comments accordingly.

Cheers

If I remember correctly, it was because Polish mountain climbing expedition thread where I "dared" to say nationality is important for someone (who seemed to care about nationality). It that was reason of ban, really, I disagree. Last time I got ban I've agreed more or less, so much for banned member never agrees.

Okay so he was possibly wrong in one instance (although you only agreed more or less, so perhaps you didn't even agree then), but you're disagreeing here...you're proving his point.

If you agree one time and disagree other time, you are not proving point of someone stating someone never agrees.

I disagree.