theyoungest wrote:Responding to Dutchies, that's what removes all reason from your posts.
Why, what was wrong with my post? I challenged your assertion that the Sky train that was flying away from Nibali at the Tour was the same beast that couldnt handle Menchov and Cobo at the Vuelta.
Why is that such an unreasanoble side to take?
Mollema isn't exactly my fav rider, but if he reaches his Vuelta 2011 level I think a Tour top-10 isn't out of the question.
Why you telling me this? I made no comment on Mollemas abilities.
BTW why should Froome have been lightyears better this year than he was in that Vuelt
the "Wiggo/Froome train" - your wording, was better in the 2012 Tour because
A they had Rogers and Porte, on the form of their lives
B they had Wiggins on the form of his life preparing his whole season for the race
C Wiggins was not coming back from a collarbone injury
and D Froome had been preparing his season for the race. In 2011, he, if we are to believe him, had come in expecting to be of a little help on the low slopes of mountains
: Winner 2013 Vuelta cq game. Winner, Velorooms prediction game 2012, 2013. 2nd all time cq rankings.
journalist with integrity.
The Father of Clean Cycling, Christophe Bassons wrote:When I look at cycling today, I get the impression that history is repeating itself: riders who are supposed to be rouleurs are climbing passes at the front of the race, and those who are supposed to be climbers are riding time trials at more than 50 kilometres per hour.
The story is beginning again, just as it did 14 years ago