Log in:  

Register

Who will better the other Contador vs Schleck in 2013!

A place to discuss all things related to current professional road races. Here, you can also touch on the latest news relating to professional road racing. A doping discussion free forum.

Schleck vs Contador in 2013

Poll ended at 25 Dec 2012 01:35

Alberto Contador
71
77%
Andy Schleck
13
14%
Other, for those who never vote but like to click buttons.
8
9%
 
Total votes : 92

26 Dec 2012 15:35

airstream wrote:The Giro hardness is opponents and contention primarily and only then parcours. The contention was away. What's the use of parcours when they rode Fedaia and Finestre like a slightly intensive training?

Not necessarily. One can crush harshly and fly over the cobbles on the next day. ;)


There are times Airstream where your naivety is glaringly apparent, you really don't have a clue, do you. There really is no point discussing this with you!
I'm in shape...Round is a shape
Unashamed Contador Fanboy

http://www.justcycling.myfastforum.org
User avatar Siriuscat
Junior Member
 
Posts: 749
Joined: 24 May 2010 21:39
Location: North East Scotland

26 Dec 2012 16:01

Siriuscat wrote:There are times Airstream where your naivety is glaringly apparent, you really don't have a clue, do you. There really is no point discussing this with you!


These words from anashamed contador fanboy only underline how i am right. God... :)
User avatar airstream
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4,283
Joined: 29 Mar 2011 18:32
Location: Minsk

26 Dec 2012 16:02

Siriuscat wrote:There are times Airstream where your naivety is glaringly apparent, you really don't have a clue, do you. There really is no point discussing this with you!


These words from anashamed contador fanboy only underline how i am right.

no clue? we can discuss this in details. I can be accused of many things but not in the fact i don't understand anything in the sport.
User avatar airstream
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4,283
Joined: 29 Mar 2011 18:32
Location: Minsk

26 Dec 2012 17:02

Siriuscat wrote:There are times Airstream where your naivety is glaringly apparent, you really don't have a clue, do you. There really is no point discussing this with you!


Indeed, so just give up ;)
"The second place is not good."
The great Alberto Contador :p
User avatar LaFlorecita
Senior Member
 
Posts: 21,151
Joined: 15 May 2011 09:53
Location: Utrecht, The Netherlands

26 Dec 2012 17:30

It is called blindness. I'm sorry for you. You see only one side in the sport.
User avatar airstream
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4,283
Joined: 29 Mar 2011 18:32
Location: Minsk

26 Dec 2012 17:31

Andy will rock!
User avatar Fearless Greg Lemond
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,838
Joined: 20 Apr 2012 15:07
Location: Netherlands

26 Dec 2012 17:57

Miburo wrote:stage 3 of 2010 tour? You're going use that? Shows how desperate you are

stage 8 2010 tour? Schleck took 8 seconds? :)

stage 12 of tour 2012? injured knee, ride giro. Yeah cool story bro :rolleyes:

Schleck never beat Contador in anything besides tour 2011. You've no evidence to support your claim whatsoever.

But reject common sense and use your imagination ;)


I'm not desperate at all, just pointing out where Schleck gained time in the 2010 Tour. I wasn't using stage 12 of the 2011 (not 2012) Tour as proof that Schleck will win either, again just pointing out where Contador got dropped.

Just because Schleck hasn't beaten Contador in the past, doesn't mean that it is completely impossible to beat him, a lot can happen. It is not common sense that Contador will win everything no matter what, that is imagination on your part. Schleck at his best (from what we have seen) can climb as well as Contador, I don't think it is outside the realm of possibilities that we could see him climbing better than Contador.
Be the Goat

Fabio Aru: "si muore sulla bici"
User avatar Afrank
Senior Member
 
Posts: 9,239
Joined: 16 Aug 2011 21:58
Location: Oregon

26 Dec 2012 18:29

Afrank wrote: Schleck at his best (from what we have seen) can climb as well as Contador, I don't think it is outside the realm of possibilities that we could see him climbing better than Contador.


Contador was obviously off-form, at about 4-5% from his perfect preparation. Is it so difficult to understand??! You have absolutely no clue.
User avatar airstream
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4,283
Joined: 29 Mar 2011 18:32
Location: Minsk

26 Dec 2012 18:33

Afrank wrote:Schleck at his best (from what we have seen) can climb as well as Contador, I don't think it is outside the realm of possibilities that we could see him climbing better than Contador.


I think it is
"The second place is not good."
The great Alberto Contador :p
User avatar LaFlorecita
Senior Member
 
Posts: 21,151
Joined: 15 May 2011 09:53
Location: Utrecht, The Netherlands

26 Dec 2012 18:55

Afrank wrote:I'm not desperate at all, just pointing out where Schleck gained time in the 2010 Tour. I wasn't using stage 12 of the 2011 (not 2012) Tour as proof that Schleck will win either, again just pointing out where Contador got dropped.

Just because Schleck hasn't beaten Contador in the past, doesn't mean that it is completely impossible to beat him, a lot can happen. It is not common sense that Contador will win everything no matter what, that is imagination on your part. Schleck at his best (from what we have seen) can climb as well as Contador, I don't think it is outside the realm of possibilities that we could see him climbing better than Contador.


Please enlighten me, when did we see Schleck doing anything on par against Contador at his best? ;)

Ask the people in the forum who they think is the better climber. Btw also ask who is the better descender, TT,...

Btw you point out a cobblestone-stage where time-changes occured after a fall in the peloten so obviously you're desperate. And Contador btw had a flat tire at the end.

Until now Contador has beaten Schleck always. How am i using my imagination that it'll keep happen? Especially knowing Schleck will lack serious rythm (it won't hurt much but every detail counts)

What are your facts? "You never know?" Is that all you got?

Who is using their imagination here?

If you think Schleck will do better, you're just being a fanboy. Nothing wrong with it but don't deny it :D
User avatar Miburo
Senior Member
 
Posts: 6,927
Joined: 29 Jul 2012 19:33

26 Dec 2012 19:19

Originally Posted by airstream
The Giro hardness is opponents and contention primarily and only then parcours. The contention was away. What's the use of parcours when they rode Fedaia and Finestre like a slightly intensive training?

Not necessarily. One can crush harshly and fly over the cobbles on the next day.


Have you ever tackled any of these climbs? Have you ever tackled any of the climbs the GT's call Hors Category?? Do you have any concept of what it takes to get up some these climbs, whether you are a top rider or not?? To suggest that these riders rode them at a training pace is simply naive.

Do you understand what it takes to hit the cobbles in Paris Roubaix at upwards of 50KPH, do you understand what it takes for us mere mortals to ride the cobbles at 20kph???

airstream wrote:These words from anashamed contador fanboy only underline how i am right.

no clue? we can discuss this in details. I can be accused of many things but not in the fact i don't understand anything in the sport.


Yes I am a bit of a fanboy, of Contador yes, of cycling absolutely and for many many years. If you feel that your knowledge of this sport is complete then why spout off some of the gibberish you do??

If you believe what you have written your naivety is staggering.

Go and ride in the Alps or the Dolimiti or Belguim or North East France or the Ardennes, then come back and tell us how you can soft tap up Passo Fedaia or the Colle delle Finestre (they have earned their full names) in a GT and still win!
I'm in shape...Round is a shape
Unashamed Contador Fanboy

http://www.justcycling.myfastforum.org
User avatar Siriuscat
Junior Member
 
Posts: 749
Joined: 24 May 2010 21:39
Location: North East Scotland

26 Dec 2012 21:58

airstream wrote:roundabout opened the poll in the summer. 80% forum members voted that the knee was made up in order to justify a probable failure. How could you comment this?

Pffff, Schleck made Contador take a risk and make fatal mistake in 2010. About what are we talking. The victory in all respects.


Heh, so you are saying that the knee injury was a faked one because of a poll on this forum said so? Hilarious. :o

Did you actually see the pics of his knee? Of course you didn't.

Anyhow, I hope Andy has fully healed and we see him back in top form next year, that will make the season better for all cycling fans.
peloton
Junior Member
 
Posts: 1,372
Joined: 12 Mar 2009 11:20

26 Dec 2012 22:40

Siriuscat wrote:Have you ever tackled any of these climbs? Have you ever tackled any of the climbs the GT's call Hors Category?? Do you have any concept of what it takes to get up some these climbs, whether you are a top rider or not?? To suggest that these riders rode them at a training pace is simply naive.

You are busily overacting. I didn't say the Giro had no affect. I'm just saying the difference between cyclists going full blast and cyclists riding relatively speaking 1500 w/h [without any lead-out, without any attacking initiative and no one is going to solve racing tasks and attack] is colossal. The second is like I don't know.. the Giro 2010 Terminillo stage when 10 riders could easily ride faster but no one wanted. They are super elite riders. Continuous 9% sector fatigue them, but when it is passed in a steady sparing tempo it is not a big problem. Yeah, sadly, when the entire top-5 of a GT are satisfied with their current GC places we are doomed to see sort of combative training. It is real nowadays. Demoralized opponents and strong competitive opponents. Do you grasp the difference? Many kilometers anchored his legs partially, but it was kilometers of easy carefree leadership so to try entirely to explain by the Giro the things we saw in the Tour is a bit thick.
I'm sure if the injury was a bit serious at least, it would of been a collapse in the Pyrenees. But it didn't happen, so it was just a slight bruise. In general the Pyrenees turned out to be one big present for Contador.
User avatar airstream
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4,283
Joined: 29 Mar 2011 18:32
Location: Minsk

26 Dec 2012 23:08

airstream wrote:I'm sure if the injury was a bit serious at least, it would of been a collapse in the Pyrenees. But it didn't happen, so it was just a slight bruise. In general the Pyrenees turned out to be one big present for Contador.


It would have been collapse in the Pyrenees if anyone would have bothered to make a move.
Dutchsmurf
Junior Member
 
Posts: 914
Joined: 05 Jul 2010 19:49

27 Dec 2012 00:55

Miburo wrote:Please enlighten me, when did we see Schleck doing anything on par against Contador at his best? ;)


2010 Tour I would say was where he pretty much matched Contador in the mountains.

Ask the people in the forum who they think is the better climber. Btw also ask who is the better descender, TT,...


I don't need to ask anyone about that, Contador is the better descender and TTer, but I would still rate a on form Schleck (2010 or 2011 Galibier) as pretty much equal to Contador on climbing.

Btw you point out a cobblestone-stage where time-changes occured after a fall in the peloten so obviously you're desperate. And Contador btw had a flat tire at the end.


Where did I use that stage as proof that Schleck is better? Up the Road said he didn't recall Schleck taking time out of Contador in 2010, so I was informing him that Schleck took time out of him on stage 3 and 8.

Until now Contador has beaten Schleck always. How am i using my imagination that it'll keep happen? Especially knowing Schleck will lack serious rythm (it won't hurt much but every detail counts)

What are your facts? "You never know?" Is that all you got?

Who is using their imagination here?


You talk about Contador winning the Tour as if it is just common sense. I call that imagination. I don't believe that it is common sense that Contador will win, simply because of the unpredictability of cycling.
Here's why I think Schleck will win, Schleck at his very best (from what we have seen) is just as strong as Contador in the mountains. In the 2011 tour he showed great strength in his solo attack. He had a bad year in 2012, so I think this has given him motivation for 2013. He wants to come back strong and show that he can still win race. I think motivation has been one of the main things he has been missing in past years, and now I think he has it (of course he will need more than motivation to get back to his best, but it will help him get back to that level or above it hopefully). And of course another part of the reason I think he can win is because he is one of my favorite riders. :)

If you think Schleck will do better, you're just being a fanboy. Nothing wrong with it but don't deny it :D


I never denied being a fanboy of Schleck. But I don't believe thinking Schleck will win is just being a fanboy of him.
Be the Goat

Fabio Aru: "si muore sulla bici"
User avatar Afrank
Senior Member
 
Posts: 9,239
Joined: 16 Aug 2011 21:58
Location: Oregon

27 Dec 2012 02:06

Hate to say this chaps but using 2010 as a comparison for anything is a waste of time for a number of reasons...

1 The Ardennes Stage - Cancellara nullified that stage at a time where it would have been easy for the peloton to take a couple of minutes out of the Schlecky boys when they fell off (supreme handling skills again). They did it because it suited them - Contador et al should have ridden, let CSC chase back as any other team would have had to do.

2 The Cobble Stage - CSC drove hard on the cobbles to put time into everybody, the target being Contador of course, despite attacking the Yellow Jersey on the back of Chavanel who was caught behind Frankies sacrifice oops crash. No-one EVER talks about that attack on the yellow.

In those two stages CSC changed the face of the race and they did it to suit themselves the same as the complaining over chaingate and everything else. Had they not been hypocritical over their tactics then the race would have been much different.

However teams use whatever tactics they see fit and who can blame them for that but we compare 2010 forgetting the way CSC changed the race in the first few of days so when we talk about 2010 remember those two days and how the race was manilpulated to suit.
I'm in shape...Round is a shape
Unashamed Contador Fanboy

http://www.justcycling.myfastforum.org
User avatar Siriuscat
Junior Member
 
Posts: 749
Joined: 24 May 2010 21:39
Location: North East Scotland

27 Dec 2012 02:59

peloton wrote:Heh, so you are saying that the knee injury was a faked one because of a poll on this forum said so? Hilarious. :o

Did you actually see the pics of his knee? Of course you didn't.

Anyhow, I hope Andy has fully healed and we see him back in top form next year, that will make the season better for all cycling fans.


I don't believe the injury was fake but it seems there are more excuses from many of his fans, for Contador when he is beaten. Sanchez, Schleck, Evans, Gesink, Basso etc...... never get the same level of sympathy. Many Contador fans see every race that Contador enters as an expected victory. All riders get sick or injured sometimes and that is sport. Not sure why some riders get the sympathy vote to a greater degree. Just fans being fans I suppose.
movingtarget
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4,854
Joined: 05 Aug 2009 08:54

27 Dec 2012 07:24

omg, there are 2 guys who dont see the difference between the cobbles and chaingate on the forum - hitch and sirius cat - and both are absolutely impartial in this respect. :p :rolleyes:

Sirius Cat, it is not important. Suited / off-suited. Cycling is Cycling. The TdF was at stake and no one was disgusted because of the chaingate too much. That wasn't just very nice from ethical point of view and nothing more. BUT the arguments about Contador who allegedly was out of form and not at his best in the 2010 Tour is just for feeble people and fanboys. He was usual, but other guys neutralized his climibing edge completely.


Listen up, dear Miburo. It is really hard for me often to distinguish whether you serious or facetious. I admit you often joke too. But for what the hell are threads created if based on the previous experience the only man can win the 2013 Tour — Contador? Let's close the forum, if you offer to go by this criteria only. Previous experience is not the only thing we can base on. It is the forum. Anything works up to 'I feel like something to happen like that' on here.

peloton wrote:Heh, so you are saying that the knee injury was a faked one because of a poll on this forum said so? Hilarious

No, but it directly points on rider's credibility.
User avatar airstream
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4,283
Joined: 29 Mar 2011 18:32
Location: Minsk

27 Dec 2012 08:52

Afrank wrote:2010 Tour I would say was where he pretty much matched Contador in the mountains.


And Alberto was at his best in 2010?
"The second place is not good."
The great Alberto Contador :p
User avatar LaFlorecita
Senior Member
 
Posts: 21,151
Joined: 15 May 2011 09:53
Location: Utrecht, The Netherlands

27 Dec 2012 11:19

movingtarget wrote:I don't believe the injury was fake but it seems there are more excuses from many of his fans, for Contador when he is beaten. Sanchez, Schleck, Evans, Gesink, Basso etc...... never get the same level of sympathy. Many Contador fans see every race that Contador enters as an expected victory. All riders get sick or injured sometimes and that is sport. Not sure why some riders get the sympathy vote to a greater degree. Just fans being fans I suppose.


We've been over this and its just your imagination. Evans fans think he could have won the 2010 tdf even with the giro in his legs. Gesink gets more excuses than contador from the army of.dutchies ( and like with contador they are mostly justified) i myself have been far more ridiculous ( though facetious) in my opinions of what samu could have done without the mont allesoutes screwjob than contador fans are.

And where are all these excuses for contador anyway? Pn 09- for which i dont even hear any excuses. Tour 2011 - which is common sense. Tour 2010- which he won anyway.

Im not seeing all these "excuses" you are.
The Hitch: Winner 2013 Vuelta cq game. Winner, Velorooms prediction game 2012, 2013. 2nd all time cq rankings.
The Father of Clean Cycling, Christophe Bassons wrote:When I look at cycling today, I get the impression that history is repeating itself: riders who are supposed to be rouleurs are climbing passes at the front of the race, and those who are supposed to be climbers are riding time trials at more than 50 kilometres per hour.

The story is beginning again, just as it did 14 years ago


journalist with integrity.
User avatar The Hitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 26,977
Joined: 14 Jun 2010 10:58
Location: London.

PreviousNext

Return to Professional road racing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: capuldemetal, DFA123, jaylew, razvan_b11, rodanafrenteguigs, SafeBet and 53 guests

Back to top