Log in:  

Register

World Politics

Grab a short black and come join in the non-cycling discussion. Favourite books, movies, holiday destinations, other sports - chat about it all in the cafe.

08 Feb 2016 22:37

Also Poland reinvestigating plane crash of 2011 which killed their president and a few other important people. Claims Russian involvement. New President is (very) right wing man from Law & Order party, who also happens to be the twin of the President who died. I can't imagine that there is any conflict of interest here, none that I can think of at least.
Brullnux
Member
 
Posts: 1,121
Joined: 31 Mar 2015 14:41

Re:

Yesterday 00:15

Brullnux wrote:Also Poland reinvestigating plane crash of 2011 which killed their president and a few other important people. Claims Russian involvement. New President is (very) right wing man from Law & Order party, who also happens to be the twin of the President who died. I can't imagine that there is any conflict of interest here, none that I can think of at least.


....yeah, one would have to be in the absolute thrall of the evil Putin to even think stuff like that...which leads directly to this...why exactly are you saying this and thinking like this.....are...you...in....the.... thrall...of.... Putin.....are you a closet Putin-lover.....?.....

Cheers
blutto
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,892
Joined: 04 Jul 2009 19:27

Yesterday 23:56

....this does not sound good does it ?....
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"On Sunday night, Israel’s Labor Party unanimously approved their leader’s diplomatic plan.

Labor’s premier Isaac Herzog laid out his vision a few weeks earlier at the Institute for National Security Studies in Tel Aviv, telling the audience that he “wish[es] to separate from as many Palestinians as possible, as quickly as possible.” Herzog continued by explaining that “we’ll erect a big wall between us. That is the kind of co-existence that is possible right now… Ariel Sharon… didn’t finish the job. We want to finish it, to complete the barrier that separates us.”

Examining Labor’s new plan more closely, what becomes bitterly clear is that “We are here, they are there” does not signify the withdrawal of Israeli power from Palestinian territories, but rather a devious way of entrenching the colonial enterprise even further.

Herzog’s underlying assumption is that under current conditions a two-state solution is impossible. He is, however, adamantly against a one state solution, whereby Jews and Palestinians live together as equals. His objective is to formulate a plan that guarantees the continued existence of a Jewish state, with about five million Palestinians living within its territory.‫

On the one hand, then, Israel should not take steps that would undermine the two-state solution, because sustaining the two-state chimera is crucial for preventing the alternative: a democratic state between the Jordan Valley and Mediterranean where Palestinians, like Jews, enjoy full citizenship. On the other hand, Herzog realizes that the two-state solution is no longer an option. He therefore lays out the blueprint of a plan that is in effect an Apartheid regime.

The specifics informing the plan, which the Labor Party approved, are not really new, but the fact that they have been outlined in writing is another crucial step in the consolidation and legitimization of Apartheid rule





The Labor Party, which is the only viable alternative to the current Likud government, and which is considered by many both in Israel and among international leaders to be a progressive substitute, has, in other words, unanimously supported a plan that would have been applauded by Apartheid South Africa.

Given this reality, it does not seem likely that a just solution to the Palestinian plight will come from within Israel. Indeed, at this historical juncture, international pressure is perhaps the only hope and is desperately needed.



Cheers


http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/02/09/israeli-labor-party-adopts-the-apartheid-mantra/


.
blutto
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,892
Joined: 04 Jul 2009 19:27

Today 00:08

....a very interesting article that looks at the patent prior to TPP and at some of the forces that were behind that decidedly undemocratic adventure ....

....the article is called How Corporations Killed Medicine. and the author is not kidding...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"“Letters patent,” meaning open letters, were issued in 14th century England to induce foreign craftsmen to relocate there. Attempts to coordinate global intellectual property rules led to the 1883 Paris Convention and the 1886 Berne Convention, and eventually to the creation of the United Nations’ World Intellectual Property Organization in 1967. But nations who signed on to those agreements retained the ability to determine the length of patents and what products would be covered. For many nations, that flexibility meant excluding medicines from patent protection. For example, Germany’s patent law of 1877 labeled medicines as “essential goods,” along with food and chemicals, and prohibited any attempts to patent them.

In the middle of the 20th century, several post-colonial nations adopted similar laws. India’s patent law extended only to the processes for creating medicines, not the drugs themselves. The law opened the door for Indian pharmaceutical manufacturers to reverse-engineer patented drugs and then devise different, cheaper production methods. India soon became known as “the pharmacy of the developing world.” Brazil, Mexico, and other Central and South American countries also adopted limits on the patentability of medicines.

European countries like Italy and Sweden didn’t grant pharmaceutical patents until the 1970s, and Spain refused to do so until 1992. Even when medicine patents were given, many nations granted liberal access to compulsory licenses for patented drugs, meaning that generic manufacturers were free to make the drugs and pay a royalty to the patent holders. During the period between 1962 and 1992, Canada granted 613 licenses to import or manufacture pharmaceutical products.

As commerce became increasingly global, this state of affairs deeply concerned pharmaceutical companies. Over time, an industry that once competed on the basis of manufacturing innovation and price had come to rely on the profits of patent monopolies. At one time in the mid-20th century, for example, Pfizer drew a full 33 percent of its global sales from just two patented drugs. So — as extensively chronicled in Peter Drahos’ and John Braithwaite’s 2002 book, Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? — Pfizer took the lead in an ambitious campaign to create a global system of intellectual property protection: an enclosure of essential medicines."

....and....

"But there was little in the way of binding international law to back up that position. So the industry pushed directly for the U.S. government to make intellectual property protection a priority in all trade negotiations. Of course, inserting monopoly patent rights into trade agreements runs counter to those agreements’ stated purpose of dismantling barriers to global competition. Yet the pharmaceutical industry, reliably at the top of the list in both lobbying expenditures and political campaign contributionsin the United States, quickly found willing partners on Capitol Hill and in the White House. The U.S. soon adopted intellectual property protection as a litmus test for its trade partners."

....and....

"In fact, a decade ago, U.S. economist Dean Baker crunched the numbers and estimated that the U.S. could save over $140 billion a year if its health systems could provide medicines without the artificial mark-up imposed by monopoly patents. That money could fund the replacement of all private industry research and development several times over, while still leaving billions of dollars in remaining public benefit. A significant source of those savings derives from eliminating the for-profit pharmaceutical companies’ expenses on marketing, a cost that exceeds their investment in research and development. As it happens, there are more efficient uses of resources than funding television ads for erectile dysfunction drugs."

http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/02/09/how-corporations-killed-medicine/

....and this situation has produced an economic situation that makes the medical industrial complex among the most profitable enterprises of all time....see below its quite astonishing actually....in fact, Martin Shkreli, the recently disgraced drug baron is not an outlier here he is more or less the norm, he just didn't have as much political cover....

http://www.bbc.com/news/business-28212223

Cheers
blutto
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,892
Joined: 04 Jul 2009 19:27

Previous

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

Back to top