No, not 66% overall, talking year over year. The growth rate is usually about 3% so for the math challenged moving to 5% is (5-3)/3=66.67% increase over the normal growth rate.
So you don't think a 66% increase is a huge change? Wow lots of companies would love to grow like that especially given the dire straights of the economy.
Maybe if it goes to trial and Trek loses badly and all the dirty laundry is aired we'll see them in court versus Armstrong shortly thereafter. That would be ironic.
I once worked for a company that had their employee manual written in pencil just so they could make changes on the fly, perhaps the UCI has something similar.
Maybe because Heras and Hamilton were multiple offenders. Floyd is back at a team that suits his level. Kash was/is an unrepentant *** while Millar groveled his way back. All seems about right.
The extent of Lemond's personal involvement is what will make it interesting. If this was a non-cycling related business dispute it would probably already be settled.