Recent content by 8472

  1. 8

    Coronavirus: How dangerous a threat?

    Only for those without any scientific background and want to ignore scientific naming conventions in favor of politics. WHO issued guidelines for naming new human and infectious diseases back in 2015. Thus every disease from 2015 onwards should be named in accordance with the guidelines. Why...
  2. 8

    Coronavirus: How dangerous a threat?

    Same as most other western countries. The European Medicine Agency is still yet to approve the SInopharm/Sinovac shots, which is still currently under review, meaning currently non-EU citizens can't travel to the bloc unless they are immunized by an EMA-approved vaccine. COVID-19 vaccines...
  3. 8

    Coronavirus: How dangerous a threat?

    Shows the importance of testing efficacy in real-world conditions. This vaccine was initially frowned upon due to its "low" efficacy of 50.4% - 70%, but which was from small sample size tests in high-risk health care workers. Real-world efficacy now seems to be at least 86-95% in Brazil, and...
  4. 8

    Coronavirus: How dangerous a threat?

    These conspiracy theorists always fail to mention that the WIV had over 1,000 staff employed. I'm guessing headlines like "Less than 0.3% of staff came down with the flu during flu season" probably won't attract too many clicks. There’s a paper by Garry et al. that presents quite persuasive...
  5. 8

    Coronavirus: How dangerous a threat?

    WRONG again. NYT told another blatant lie by quoting Dominic Dywer whom they claimed was part of the WHO team. Here Dwyer admits he was never on the team but part of a group of independent experts: “We go there as an international group and we're not part of the WHO, we're just independent...
  6. 8

    Coronavirus: How dangerous a threat?

    The experts in question have provided clarification for their quotes that were deliberately twisted, manipulated, and taken out of context by the NYT and echoed across all MSM outlets to fit their agenda, as expected. @PeterDaszak - This was NOT my experience on @WHO mission. As lead of...
  7. 8

    Coronavirus: How dangerous a threat?

    LOL, according to this unnamed person with an agenda: PEGs have not been widely used and therefore it is not surprising to see allergic reactions. Except for the fact that PEG and PEG derivatives are one of the most common ingredients used in personal care, beauty, and household cleaning...
  8. 8

    Coronavirus: How dangerous a threat?

    Lancet-branded paper on the use of Ivermectin for improving COVID symptoms (loss of smell), and a tendency to lowering viral load (but no statistical significance due to small sample size). The effect of early treatment with ivermectin on viral load, symptoms and humoral response in patients...
  9. 8

    Coronavirus: How dangerous a threat?

    Feel sorry for you, eating up every single lie from Mike "We lied, we cheated, we stole" Pompeo since you obviously can't think for yourself. Still waiting for him to present the so called "enormous evidence" that he supposedly has, instead of repeating these lies that have been debunked many...
  10. 8

    Coronavirus: How dangerous a threat?

    Without counting the "very mild" cases, the efficacy was 78%, but drops to 50% if they count all symptoms as a case (with/without a PCR confirmation test). From Sciencemag...
  11. 8

    Coronavirus: How dangerous a threat?

    A look at different vaccines under development. https://newsinteractives.cbc.ca/coronavirusvaccinetracker/
  12. 8

    Coronavirus: How dangerous a threat?

    Definitely a fun read from a pure speculation point of view that conspiracy theorists would love. Fact of the matter is this: proponents of the lab leak theory depend on the idea of the coronavirus leaping from animals to humans as being improbable – which it’s not. In 2018, the same Shi...
  13. 8

    Coronavirus: How dangerous a threat?

    The virus sequence not being sequenced yet is the exact reason why he shouldn't have spread rumors about it being SARS. The exact type of SARS? LOL! At that stage there was only 1 type of SARS (the one from 2003), the virus wasn't even called SARS-COV-2 at that stage prior to the virus being...
  14. 8

    Coronavirus: How dangerous a threat?

    This arrest of Zhang Zhan and subsequent MSM coverage actually provides great insight into those who control the corporate media and what they publish. Ever notice how the story published by all the MSM outlets are suspiciously similar, using the exact same sentences, almost as if someone had...
  15. 8

    Coronavirus: How dangerous a threat?

    I already posted the link earlier, see here: https://worldaffairs.blog/2020/02/08/was-the-wuhan-doctor-a-brave-whistleblower-silenced-by-the-government/ It contains the specific screenshot of the WeChat post, where Li inaccurately claimed that the novel coronavirus was SARS, and that SARS had...