Recent content by Chris James

Re: Re: Junior gearing is definitely checked in the UK

Re: Re: Fair enough but it all seems simple minded logic to me. Take Pantani. He won a load of races as a kid demonstrating he was true champion according to John Swanson's criteria. No suspicious leaps in ability there, just one steady progression. Of the recent riders like Pinot and Bardet...

Re: Re: Do you have any riders on your list that turned 23 within the last 30 years? Also, bizarrely since you basically saying that Froome's performances are all down to drugs, all the riders on that list, except for Lemond got busted for doping?

My point is that YOU aren't discussing the data. You have just decided the data doesn't exists because you don't believe it. Data isn't making up implausible reasons for why you might have been right all along.

I don't understand your point. Are you suggesting that the lab might have fabricated the results themselves in 2007 to inflate the results of a young Konica Minolta rider for reasons best known to themselves. Or are you suggesting that the WADA accredited lab in Lausanne would be happy for...

It isn't up to me to explain anything, I'm not Chris Froome's mum. I'm just saying that there appears to be independent lab testing to show that he was able to put out those numbers in 2007.

So you think Michelle Froome falsified the lab report and then got in published in a magazine with a worldwide readership and has her fingers crossed that the lab won't notice what she has done? You lot are weird. I have read that anonymous posters on the internet reckon they know exactly what...

But the lab test of 2007 says that he did have 'those numbers' - so how do you explain that?