Recent content by ChrisE

Clinic is a team sport, I understand. Don't quote both of us, with Mark suggesting LA superiority and me discounting UCI coverup, and then you being 'complimentary' by making up some other 7 year conspiracy that will keep the clinic in heat. I don't agree with you one bit about payoffs for that...

Cool story, bro.

I'm not sure why you feel the need to follow me around the forum nit-picking. Maybe you feel the need for validation due to some trauma in your past. You should check into that. Mark, Dave, and I have been discussing doping for many years, close to 10 for me and Dave. We've gotten this far...

Maybe you should read some of the GL threads. You can also learn about the clinic timeline of EPO introduction as well while you are at it.

Why are horse steroids, or whatever kind of steroids, being discussed? Steroids give no advantage, unless they do. :rolleyes:

Doesn't everybody have asthma? :rolleyes:

How would you know? Are you still in your crack induced freaky stage? If so, that would cloud your judgement. Plus, I thought you were dead. Super Freak, indeed. :D

I don't think it is only in cycling. Hinault was right on that point...cycling gets a bad rap when other sports are doping just as much, or more. Look at the joke that is the MLB testing. Do you think 300+ lb linemen running sub 5 second 40's are doing it on water and t-bones? Look at how...

You claiming LA ushered in the method of payoffs in cycling? He really is in your head. So, your theory is that LA just paid everybody off for those 7 years? Have you told this to people that should know, so they can start blabbing about it? Basso TT, if somebody has an off day it is...

Cue the "B-b-b-b-b-ut, UCI coverup!" card. :rolleyes: Heads up, it will be incoming! I at least (maybe you?) believe that the UCI coverup and blind eye towards doping started before 99 and continued after his retirement, with a few token exceptions. I have said all along here and elsewhere...

C'mon MI...you read what I wrote. I am aware of the faster times after the introduction of EPO. If EPO had come first, then riders started taking other PEDs in addition to EPO, would that have been a game changer? Surely you can admit times would have been faster after those subsequent PEDs...

It's a cocktail, as your buddy notes. So, what if EPO came first? Roids and uppers would not have been used? Doubtful. Do you think roid and uppers, with no OOC testing especially, were effective? How much? What do you base that upon? Fact is there are no controlled studies done...

Cite? Is there a controlled study where a group of athletes, doped up on uppers and roids over a period of time with zero OOC testing and not nearly the scrutiny as present day, is compared to an EPO or blood doping routine? I didn't think so. I would say it this point maybe you and the...

Sometimes I get bored. You have room to talk with your ongoing arguments with the resident wingnut in the politics forum. :cool:

Because you posted in the third person, not as your opinion. A not so subtle distancing from what Hinault doping insinuates. We know why you did that.....your hero Captain America beating dopers means you have to do more screeching on the forum.