Recent content by D-Queued

Re: Re: If you say so. Didn't seem to stop anyone at Floyd's fairness hearing in exposing Will Geogahan. But, YMMV Dave.

Re: Maybe he doesn't want to catch the real dopers after all. Dave. Edit to add ('cuz I haven't posted for a while...) ;)

Re: Re: You've been around for a while, but a couple of decades ago, and thanks to Willy's insights, this type of group malaise received new medical terminology and was christened Festina Flu. Dave.

Re: Re: Hi Alpe, The guy to ask - re Pre - is our friend from Texas (no, not Lance... a real friend Glen (?) here in the forums). But, I dunno if he is still around. He got banninated once, then I think he was posting again for a while. But, you are probably right, we can easily anticipate...

Re: Re: So that matters hnow? Simple. Doesn't this example underscore actionable intent and further evidence of financial collusion with the head of the UCI towards an inarguable corruption of the sport's structure? Not a single comment on non-LA structural corruption? Thanks for...

Re: Re: Dear Alpe73, This is the Lance Armstrong thread, not the D-Queued thread. Discussing my participation is a waste of bandwidth. Even if the remaining readers are few, they don't need their time to be wasted. If you want to send a message, go ahead and DM me. Since you insist, however...

Re: Re: Thanks for the clarification. Not sure it makes me feel any better, though, about sponsor involvement. And, yes, I heartily agree that Lance could only further pervert what was a perverted sport (point taken above ^ MarkvW) and could not possibly, in and of himself, be blamed for...

Re: Re: :lol: Oh, and try and follow the plot here. You commented about structure. I responded on structure. Ok, the attempted purchase of ASO/TdF was post Posties (2006-8). Pretty much everything else was Postal related or connected. The attempted purchase of ASO/TdF, however, is...

Re: Re: Self-confession, if this was posted previously then I admit to a very poor memory of it! So, if you are referring to me at all, definitely my bad. Dave.

Re: Re: Thanks - it figures. A cynical punster might suggest that: - News about Barry travels slowly - This suggests that he isn't an A-Lister - Nobody cares about Sky doping since the info is out there Or something like that. Dave.

Re: Re: Umm, who is the numpty? Please refer to the (now) bolded part above. Perhaps you missed that when you included it in your reply, but it appears that after claiming that that doping is black or white that he, Barry, then scopes out a gray area, or at least claims that Sky is living in...

Re: Well stated. Maybe its just me, but if doping is 'a black and a white', then playing the gray area isn't white now is it? Dave.

Re: Official Lance Armstrong Thread: Part 3 (Post-Confession The Biebs is all yours, thanks. Dave.

Re: Re: "None of those other things are really structure"? Then please feel free to educate me on the structure of the sport and what you meant by doping being a problem of the structure. As you cogitate on that, please allow me to offer one view of that 'structure'. Your view may differ...

Re: Re: Sad!?!? Ha! I've just been Trumped! Oh, and Nazified in the same post. Now that is a first. Surprised you didn't suggest I was promoting fake news. Yup, you got me with your compelling logic and well-reasoned arguments. Lots of data to back you up, I'm sure. Dave.