Recent content by gheizhwinder

To be fair, Peraud was 9th when he crashed out in the last week of the 2013 tour.

Well, whether they do or not, you wouldn't be contributing directly. It's as much of a grey area as reading a copy that a cafe has bought. Would you object to those circumstances?

All of you who don't want to give money to Murdoch but want to read Walsh's articles, I suggest you join your nearest library and use UK Newsstand. It's not that hard.

I think he's saying you can't necessarily apply a trend observed in a large population to make firm conclusions about an individual.

Well, the reason I said that was because no evidence was being given for causality other than correlation. So the fact that they do not always coincide was what was needed to dispute the argument given. The fact that correlation CAN be a result of causality is completely irrelevent in this case.

Correlation does not equal causality.

ITV have decided that Sagan didn't win the points jersey at the TdF :-) http://www.itv.com/tourofbritain/news/2012-stage-1-report/

Valverde was not on his own though, he had Quintana and Intxausti(?).

I just checked on that myself, for the same reason :-) http://twist.future.net.uk/showthread.php?p=233281#post233281 Speaks Flemish I reckon!

To be fair, he says the same as that but the other way round:

The above is also a blog.

Which film is, by curious coincidence, on UK television right now.

The Science of Sport blog used it here: http://www.sportsscientists.com/2011/03/biological-passport-effective-fight-or.html (ETA: Source: Zorzoli & Rossi, 2010; Zorzoli 2011)

Are there bonifications in the ITT?

Jeremy Whittle.