Recent content by gryphon

Re: Re: Then tell me what happens if Froome and his legal counsel decide not to respond at all? After all, no one can be compelled to present a defense. What happens to him then if he hasn't broken a rule at this point?

Re: Re: Incorrect. 2.1 Presence of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers in an Athlete’s Sample 2.1.2 Sufficient proof of an anti-doping rule violation under Article 2.1 is established by any of the following: presence of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers...

Re: Re: "IF Chris Froome is found, by UCI/WADA, to have broken the rules ..." Let's be very clear here, Froome has already been found to have broken a rule. Done. Now, however, he is provided an opportunity to satisfactorily explain how and why he broke a rule.

Re: So he puts in a major effort to drop the breakaway group on the final climb, then holds the peloton at bay for over 8km, including the very flat last 3km where he kept them at 0:10 back, only to cross the finish line, hop off his bike easy as can be and proceed to strut around seemingly...

My first post here because I'm shocked that no one has pointed out, what is to me, the most ironic part of this article. Namely, Betsy saying, "...Who you going to believe: a pathological liar or people who have been telling the truth for well over a decade?" Is this not on page one of the...