Recent content by Logic Al

do you not think the Sky doping programme is more sophisticated than other teams?

Isn’t it just what he thinks though? Or at least what he’s prepared to write (journalists need ‘evidence’ more than forumites on the Clinic)? He could well be wrong, he may know he can be wrong Just the accusations that he’s abandoned his morals and joined the dark side are a bit far...

Definitely, Walsh may be wrong about Froome/Sky But to accuse him of turning after everything he's done last 12 years or so is crazy

As someone whose French only extends as far as saying hello and ordering a beer, what's the jist of that article?

So what’s he taken/taking then to have a dramatic rise to 2011 and then stay consistent with no abnormalities for 2 years?

Why is it a conflict of interest?

Think most people's minds are so fervently made up that they will never change them if he's 'innocent' and until he gets caught if he's not Doesn't seem like anyone looks at this with an open mind, just from the angle to try and support whatever they thought previously

On why L’equipe, Sky have said L’equipe suggested it as an option which they took and they’re looking at other options as well

so if he is doping, does that mean he's doping consistently throughout the last 2 years?

Yep, British dominance will make cycling really popular. Everyone likes good old British people winning everything!

No idea, see dozens of holes on both 'sides' Not sure yet which bandwagon to jump on, but determined to be on the right one so that I can say 'I told you so' when the truth comes out ;)

[/b] So Sky are better at doping than everyone else, but at nothing other than doping?

So arguably most extreme case, must be something more to it than usual doping?

What question would you ask him to help prove innocence/guilt?

Fair enough, but do you think that would have solved anything? Not as if Sky haven't been asked 100's of doping questions last 12 months!