Recent content by mudbone

i'm not disputing this, rather that Froome claimed immediately after mont ventoux not to have done any training on the method - ie: directly contradicting his words quoted above in the Kimmage interview. I've found Froome's original explanation (in the press conference the day after Ventoux)...

has this quote been explored yet? it was the one that really stuck out to me contradiction-wise. Does anyone else remember the interview immediately after Ventoux where Froome said he had done no special training on 'sitting sprints'? i believe it was a filmed interview, probably press...

DirtyWorks on point back in January.

from the tour de france 30 years ago....

how many instances are there of cyclists being positive for recreational drugs? and further, why do they make up the majority of positives in football, compared to other sports?

thanks patswana.

they're lining up some pretty severe penalties for drug use....

agreed, the one linked at the top of the article, as an "alternative view" is much better and very thorough.

do you mean like kittel?

i have no idea about saldariaga or luisa personally, but trainers, doctors and backup team are always the best indication of the likelihood of whether a sportsperson is clean or not. this kind of thing also helps.

are you really suggesting this person took drugs?

Kittel came out and did an interview within a week of the TV programme revealing the UV treatment. http://www.zeit.de/sport/2012-02/interview-kittel-doping-erfurt/seite-1 Some of what he said, quite candid on a number of points;

the doc (veloclinic) on the test http://veloclinic.tumblr.com/post/58157292258/kittel-lie-detector-test-clarifying-missconceptions

'the machine is never wrong son...' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJ5aIvjNgao (i like kittel's outspokenness btw)

disgusting.