Recent content by ScienceIsCool

  1. S

    All About Salbutamol

    Rrrrr. Working so hard not to understand!! Measured above threshold and confirmed by b sample equals an AAF. Boop! The finding was adverse. They really did! And it really was! After that it's just up to whoever to decide if they believe the dog ate my homework story. Except in this case...
  2. S

    All About Salbutamol

    Re: It really is amazing, isn't it? But I bet the controversy does die down because soon it will be the Tour and we'll be on our way to the next scandal and outrage. John Swannson
  3. S

    Fully doped cycling? 65km TDF Stage 17

    Anyways, we are going to see some seriously fun performances on this stage. Delayed or not. I can't wait. John Swanson
  4. S

    Fully doped cycling? 65km TDF Stage 17

    Re: Re: Tropic Thunder is a great movie. John Swanson
  5. S

    Fully doped cycling? 65km TDF Stage 17

    Re: Re: Yeah. The origin is from delayed mentally. Colloquialized to mean stupid. Co-opted to mean that some cyclists do stupid things that we are supposed to believe are normal. <--- Has nothing to do with people with mental handicaps. Heaven forbid a Brit you know smokes a ***... John...
  6. S

    Fully doped cycling? 65km TDF Stage 17

    Re: Re: *** means delayed. The context is all in the usage. In this case it means "stupid". Don't go fully stupid. This does not denigrate anyone except Froome. It has absolutely no reference to someone who is mentally delayed. Froome has and will go full ***. John Swanson
  7. S

    Fully doped cycling? 65km TDF Stage 17

    Re: Good luck with that. EVERYTHING is offensive to some group of people. Some of you are offended right now! John Swanson
  8. S

    Fully doped cycling? 65km TDF Stage 17

    Re: Don't ever take a senior level EM physics course then... You'll spend months calculating *** potentials. Meh. I just can't get worked up over words and labels. If you really find a word offensive, it's usually better to co-opt it to rob it of any power. John Swanson
  9. S

    Teams & Riders Froome Talk Only

    Re: Re: Weak. Super weak. You make the claims, you get to defend them. Nice deflection. Too bad it was horrible. John Swanson
  10. S

    Teams & Riders Froome Talk Only

    Re: Re: That's a specious argument. First, you need to back your claim that riders were experimenting with Eli without medical assistance at the time it was introduced to the cycling world. Then you need to show that this experimenting didn't happen as a result of wider medicalisation. I...
  11. S

    Motor doping thread

    Re: Re: Short answer is no. Long answer is nope. Any type of reactive material has a small percentage of contraction. To make it useful you need the type of leverage that tendons and ligaments provide. Lots of other problems too.
  12. S

    Hall of Shame in Doping | Inaugural Edition

    As someone who lived through it, Lemond had all the signs of being a true champion. He started winning as a teenager as soon as he picked up the sport and was dominant. Within a few short years he was a pro and again racking up the wins. At 16 he won the junior national road title. AT 17 he...
  13. S

    Teams & Riders Froome Talk Only

    Re: Re: No thanks! John Swanson
  14. S

    Teams & Riders Froome Talk Only

    Re: Re: Riddle me this! Why didn't Horner get a ride the following year? John Swanson
  15. S

    Teams & Riders Froome Talk Only

    Re: Re: Dopity-dope-doper!! Statistically proven to have gained > 15% FTP in a 3 week period. All that's left is to pick the method. Motors, blood, chemicals... Who cares! John Swanson