Recent content by the omertà hurts

vs it strikes me that these opposing viewpoints are what this 700+ page thread essentially boils down to. well that and amateur google-sleuths with pseudo-hypothesising mania :) oh and the fail on sunday tax story is awful hackery, the drugs one not so much.

The Church Of Lanceology

guess that rules him out of a job at sky. should still be good for the UCI tho...

Would that be the same Science Of Sport guys who tweeted Captain y'day? "I want to invite you to put that bio-passport analysis you do into an article or that I would host on my site.If you are interested.Links back to yours,full credit.I think you do an amazing job with it."

Yes my bad. In my defense, I was in bed on an ipad and they really are crap for looking at information or typing with. Yes my bad. In my defense, I was in bed on an ipad and they really are crap for looking at information or typing with. Yes my bad. In my defense, I was in bed on an ipad and...

i'm sure you're both coming at this from the point, cycling enthusiasts who don't want to see doping being systematically covered up in the sport, by sky or anyone else. but the point being; he's re-examining and applying scientific method to data in the public domain; results from riders'...

so when asked for additional evidence rogers has been doping you refer to figures rogers offered in interviews himself? lol. in the nicest way possible, i'd suggest you do more focused, objective study, more deep analytical thinking and much, much less google fuelled posting. you're not going...

better idea; dissolve the UCI

funny froome went to vinokourov's farewell criterium, which seemed to double as a who's who of dopers.

sure, but with such obvious close links to dopers from the start of his pro career, just thought it peculiar he's never discussed (as far as i've seen). especially when his performances and (relative) recent improvement in climbing are circumstantial sticks used to beat other sky riders.... but...

maybe not the right place to ask this question, but have wondered recently why cavendish doesn't seem to get mentioned in all the speculation that gets knocked about here? after all, he's had close links with self-confessed dopers Rolf Aldag, Zabel and Brian Holm, who he's just hooked back up...

+1 ahaha. you've really got to hand it to the United States of Advertising, don't you? what a Faustian pact was made when their Corporations rolled in to bring pro-cycling out of "the dark ages", as Bradley put it.

?

he speaks frankly and very well, in my opinion

a disappointing interview with andy schleck from current tour of beijing. http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/andy-schleck-cycling-needs-to-focus-on-the-future basically says, the past should just be forgotten about as it doesn't impact on the future, which he "believes in". he is unconcerned...