• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

2014 Giro d'Italia, Stage 15: Valdengo-Plan Di Montecampione (225 km)

Aug 16, 2011
10,819
2
0
Via Eshnar's analysis.

tappa_dettagli_tecnici_planimetria_15.jpg


tappa_dettagli_tecnici_altimetria_15.jpg


tappa_15_S02.jpg


Technical overview:
Long, MTF-only stage, but it's quite a MTF! Plan di Montecampione is over 19 km long and has an average gradient of 7.6%, including 3 km of false flat two thirds up the climb, which lower the average gradient significantly. Strangely enough they won't finish at the top but 1 km short, for no official reasons (unless I missed something).

What to expect:
GC action after the false flat part of the climb, surely. If these were the 90s it would be different, but that's what we get today.

Pantani Tribute:
Giro 1998 stage 19
Granted, we won't see anything like that this year.
 
kingjr said:
Makes one wish EPO would be legalized, without HCT-limits, doesn't it?

That has already been discussed to dead. Doping IS NOT the reason why the racing is more conservative this days.

Dumber parcours, stronger overall teams and idiotic point systems that reward stupid top 10 placings is what is wrong with cycling.

Just look at today's stage and how Cannondale chased Rolland and Hesjedal for like 20/30k because they were defending basso's top 10 placing, which is pathetic coming from a guy that has won the race before and even worse considering he couldn't follow the favourites as soon as the pace got tough.
 
May 19, 2010
173
0
0
This should be an interesting stage after today, not that I expect big time gaps or long range attacks. It will either confirm what we have seen today or that uran was actually having a bad day.

I don't think there will be any attacks until after the false flat (from the top 6). at which point either pozzovivio or nairo will attack with the other to follow. I think uran will let it go and just ride tempo. Evans will stick to urans wheel and hope to gain those 3-7seconds on the finish line. im not sure how majka will race but kelderman will attempt to go with nairo/pozzivivio and get dropped but hold on to come in with evans or uran. all up I see at most 10-20secs. real gains to come later in the week assuming uran is done.
 
Aug 16, 2013
7,620
2
0
richo36 said:
This should be an interesting stage after today, not that I expect big time gaps or long range attacks. It will either confirm what we have seen today or that uran was actually having a bad day.

I don't think there will be any attacks until after the false flat (from the top 6). at which point either pozzovivio or nairo will attack with the other to follow. I think uran will let it go and just ride tempo. Evans will stick to urans wheel and hope to gain those 3-7seconds on the finish line. im not sure how majka will race but kelderman will attempt to go with nairo/pozzivivio and get dropped but hold on to come in with evans or uran. all up I see at most 10-20secs. real gains to come later in the week assuming uran is done.

You're sure you are not watching the replay of today's stage?:p
 
This is a nicely designed stage. The long final climb begins at 40k beyond Saturday's stage, and the last 6k of the climb begins at about the same altitude as Oropa's finish line. With a rest day following, we might get to see some significant time gaps.
 
With 200kms of flat before the climb, will anybody be bothered to chase the right break?
Oh and Pierre Rolland will need a new tactic, although chapeau for not waiting on the final climb, these past two Saturdays.
 
Jul 4, 2011
1,475
0
0
Dont think Pozzo or Quintana will make up 2 or 3 minutes but after today's performance by Uran maybe we see Evans back in Pink?
 
Mellow Velo said:
With 200kms of flat before the climb, will anybody be bothered to chase the right break?
Oh and Pierre Rolland will need a new tactic, although chapeau for not waiting on the final climb, these past two Saturdays.

Rolland moved inside top 10:
1 URAN URAN Rigoberto COL OPQ 57:52:51 0:00
2 EVANS Cadel AUS BMC 57:53:23 0:32
3 MAJKA Rafal POL TCS 57:54:26 1:35
4 POZZOVIVO Domenico ITA ALM 57:55:02 2:11
5 KELDERMAN Wilco NED BEL 57:55:24 2:33
6 QUINTANA Nairo COL MOV 57:55:55 3:04
7 ARU Fabio ITA AST 57:56:07 3:16
8 POELS Wouter NED OPQ 57:56:52 4:01
9 ROLLAND Pierre FRA EUC 57:57:58 5:07
10 KISERLOVSKI Robert CRO TFR 57:58:04 5:13
11 BASSO Ivan ITA CAN 57:58:58 6:07
12 HESJEDAL Ryder CAN GRS 57:59:04 6:13
13 MORABITO Steve SUI BMC 57:59:44 6:53
14 ULISSI Diego ITA LAM 58:00:12 7:21

But his ambition level is clearly much higher. Stage win, GC podium or nothing methinks.

Not much he can do on this extended Vuelta style stage design.
 
kingjr said:
I disagree with that. And even if you were right, it would definitely look more impressive.

Doping is not the only reason racing is more conservative these days. After all, Levi Leipheimer spent his whole career doped up and never animated anything.

Points systems and riding to defend placements rather than risk the placement to win a stage or get a win are killing the sport, and the parcours designers are either struggling to take this into account and serving up routes it is easy to control (recent Dauphinés, Tours and Paris-Nice editions), or are realising what is creating gaps and going to illogical extremes to serve this (the Vuelta, which is marginalising the TT and going overboard with summit finishes on stupidly tough gradients). So we're left either way with racing that is controlled until the last 5km. One day racing has in recent history served up much better racing than stage races. And why is that? A large part of it is that in a one-day race there's nothing afterward that you need to save yourself for.
 
phanatic said:
This is a nicely designed stage. The long final climb begins at 40k beyond Saturday's stage, and the last 6k of the climb begins at about the same altitude as Oropa's finish line. With a rest day following, we might get to see some significant time gaps.

This stage is a lot of things, but it's not a nicely designed stage. This is the most disgraceful stage you can design that finishes on a Plan Di Montecampione. It's not a worthy tribute to Il Pirata
 
Red Rick said:
This stage is a lot of things, but it's not a nicely designed stage. This is the most disgraceful stage you can design that finishes on a Plan Di Montecampione. It's not a worthy tribute to Il Pirata

The Organizers rational for this stage design was to make the length the main factor to wear down the peloton before the climb, but I do believe what this kind of course is going to do is to force all the GC riders to sit up until the foot of the climb-perhaps a breakaway might make it, but is unlikely....

I would have either sacrificed the length for another climb before Montecampione or have a consecutive bumps (3k climbs) near to the last climb , so it could encourage the kind of activity that we had on stage 14....
 
The biggest observation I have this wkd is that in a race with depleted teams and no one or two dominating teams (like SKY), GC guys need ... alliances.

Look at what Hesjedal & Rolland accomplished; far more than they could have individually, or by sticking with their teamates.

Look at the top 10 and just think about the combos of guys on different squadra (example, Tinkoff/Astana) who could briefly team-up to gang-up.

When you're at your limit of energy, go further with synergy.
 
Apr 4, 2013
9
0
0
Red Rick said:
This stage is a lot of things, but it's not a nicely designed stage. This is the most disgraceful stage you can design that finishes on a Plan Di Montecampione. It's not a worthy tribute to Il Pirata

My questions is:

Why is Pantani worthy of tributes? Because he is dead? Should we be putting Lance stages in the TDF now?

I'm not trolling, I just feel it's a fair question to ask.