• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

2014 Vuelta al País Vasco, Stage 2: Ordizia → Dantxarinea (Urdazubi), 155.8 km

2014 Vuelta al País Vasco, Stage 2: Ordizia → Dantxarinea (Urdazubi), 155.8 km

The easiest stage of the race.
etapa11.jpg


Contenders - Matthews, Swift, Ratto, Wegmann, Van der Sande, Martens/Hivert, Geschke, Gilbert... :D
 
If there's one thing I've learned from watching Pais Vasco over the years, it's that on profiles like this the answer is often 'who the hell knows'? Sure it looks 'easy' because there isn't a categorized climb in the last 50km, but there are like 6 uncategorized climbs on the profile in that space, and those have been killer in the past. Plus it looks like an uphill drag finish. Scenarios that wouldn't surprise me:

- Matthews wins a sprint from a group of 50;
- Valverde (or Kiwi, maybe) wins a sprint from a small group of favorites that drop everyone else on the unexpectedly steep final uncategorized climb;
- Contador sees a difficult section on the last 'climb', seizes the opportunity and accelerates, and gets the stage plus another 10-15 seconds;
- a small group makes it to the top of the last uncategorized climb and a reckless descender (does Samu still have it?) goes for it and gets it on an unexpectedly technical run down to the finish;

This stage seems like it could be more selective than stage 3, but who knows. The variety of climbs and opportunity for many different scenarios on each stage goes a long way towards making this my favourite weeklong race on the calendar, for sure.
 
skidmark said:
If there's one thing I've learned from watching Pais Vasco over the years, it's that on profiles like this the answer is often 'who the hell knows'? Sure it looks 'easy' because there isn't a categorized climb in the last 50km, but there are like 6 uncategorized climbs on the profile in that space, and those have been killer in the past. Plus it looks like an uphill drag finish. Scenarios that wouldn't surprise me:

- Matthews wins a sprint from a group of 50;
- Valverde (or Kiwi, maybe) wins a sprint from a small group of favorites that drop everyone else on the unexpectedly steep final uncategorized climb;
- Contador sees a difficult section on the last 'climb', seizes the opportunity and accelerates, and gets the stage plus another 10-15 seconds;
- a small group makes it to the top of the last uncategorized climb and a reckless descender (does Samu still have it?) goes for it and gets it on an unexpectedly technical run down to the finish;

This stage seems like it could be more selective than stage 3, but who knows. The variety of climbs and opportunity for many different scenarios on each stage goes a long way towards making this my favourite weeklong race on the calendar, for sure.

Now that would suit me just fine. :D
 
movingtarget said:
I'm surprised that Gilbert is being considered as a winner of anything at the moment.

I said I wouldn't mind if he won....I kinda like him, so it would be nice to see. But you're right, he may very well come home with nothing at this race. Even if he is not the top favorite, he should still be considered a candidate for victory though.
 
May 18, 2010
414
0
9,280
From looking at the graph the last hill starts off with 2km at 5% then 2 more km at around 2-3%.

It will probably look abit different compared to yesterday, now that it isnt 10% anymore.

There is litterally no room between the decent and finish line so a daring descent might just win someone the game. Thinking about Samuel Sanchez here..

If no attack sticks, i guess we will see a pre-ardennes showdown.
 
skidmark said:
If there's one thing I've learned from watching Pais Vasco over the years, it's that on profiles like this the answer is often 'who the hell knows'? Sure it looks 'easy' because there isn't a categorized climb in the last 50km, but there are like 6 uncategorized climbs on the profile in that space, and those have been killer in the past. Plus it looks like an uphill drag finish. Scenarios that wouldn't surprise me:

- Matthews wins a sprint from a group of 50;
- Valverde (or Kiwi, maybe) wins a sprint from a small group of favorites that drop everyone else on the unexpectedly steep final uncategorized climb;
- Contador sees a difficult section on the last 'climb', seizes the opportunity and accelerates, and gets the stage plus another 10-15 seconds;
- a small group makes it to the top of the last uncategorized climb and a reckless descender (does Samu still have it?) goes for it and gets it on an unexpectedly technical run down to the finish;

This stage seems like it could be more selective than stage 3, but who knows. The variety of climbs and opportunity for many different scenarios on each stage goes a long way towards making this my favourite weeklong race on the calendar, for sure.

They seem fairly likely. If it's a bunch sprint, I'll go with Matthews. If there's a good break and attacks I'll go with Albasini, either Sanchez, Gilbert or similar. If the big names ramp it up in the last 30-40km I think we'll be treated to a Gerrans/Valverde/Gilbert showdown. IMO this may happen, as these guys may want a mental edge heading in to the Ardennes.
 
I think this will be won from a breakaway. With over half the riders more than 9 minutes down on GC after stage one, and no obvious team to chase I predict a fierce battle to get into the breakaway on the first climb. I will go for Wellens to spark some life into my CQ team:)
 
Mar 9, 2010
551
0
0
vladimir said:
I think this will be won from a breakaway. With over half the riders more than 9 minutes down on GC after stage one, and no obvious team to chase I predict a fierce battle to get into the breakaway on the first climb. I will go for Wellens to spark some life into my CQ team:)

yep. after stage 1. cool race this is. :):):)
 
Aug 3, 2009
1,562
0
0
Vichot and slagter seem good for me. A break might take it too, as there are no bonus, why would saxo chase everybody? There are a lot of people already at 10+minutes
 
Jun 25, 2013
381
0
0
Hugo Koblet said:
I'm backing Vichot for this. It's a good test for the Ardennes.

If Vichot can pull off a win here, he has truly made a step up to the next level. Very strong list of on-form punchy finishers here.
 
After 29km, gap 2:30

66º 4 IZAGIRRE, Gorka MOV + 06′ 32″
89º 13 DUPONT, Hubert ALM + 14′ 32″
61º 88 JUNGELS, Bob TFR + 04′ 15″
112º 135 MALACARNE, Davide EUC + 15′ 45″
85º 151 MARTIN, Tony OPQ + 11′ 36″
92º 152 BAKELANTS, Jan OPQ + 14′ 32″
63º 142 MONFORT, Maxime LTB + 05′ 06″

Fraile somewhere in the middle.

Anyway damn strong break. Should put Tinkoff under some pressure.
 
Apr 15, 2013
954
0
0
Dazed and Confused said:
After 29km, gap 2:30

66º 4 IZAGIRRE, Gorka MOV + 06′ 32″
89º 13 DUPONT, Hubert ALM + 14′ 32″
61º 88 JUNGELS, Bob TFR + 04′ 15″
112º 135 MALACARNE, Davide EUC + 15′ 45″
85º 151 MARTIN, Tony OPQ + 11′ 36″
92º 152 BAKELANTS, Jan OPQ + 14′ 32″
63º 142 MONFORT, Maxime LTB + 05′ 06″

Fraile somewhere in the middle.

Anyway damn strong break. Should put Tinkoff under some pressure.

why ? If I am Tinkoff I just controle it so that the lead doesn't balloon above 4/5 minutes and leave it at that.