Yes, it's that time of the year again! The greatest GT of all is back! And with that comes my traditional route analysis.
Let me introduce...
THE 99TH GIRO!!!
The 2016 Giro can be seen as a confirmation of the trend set by the 2015 edition, that broke up with the MTF overkill pattern that the Giro was adopting, culminated with the 2014 edition. The 2016 Giro has only one top category MTF, and only one other MTF on something that can be called a proper climb. With the grand-total of 2 proper MTFs, this Giro is almost the polar opposite of its 2014 self, that had 8 MTFs (six 1st cat. and two 2nd cat.). With respect to its more handsome brother 2015 though, this Giro appears a bit anemic. It features less things: fewer kilometers against the clock (although it does have more TT stages), fewer mountain stages. It is not as balanced as last year, with the pure climbers getting buffed by a MTT and a twistier and shorter ITT. On the bright side, the TTT disappeared for the first time in quite a few years. It won't be missed.
As for the flat stages, this edition is quite sprinter-friendly, featuring no less than 5 sure sprints and other 2 stages that could and probably will go to the fast men. But that is often the case with the Giro starting abroad.
Like 2015 this Giro will feature a healthy amount of hilly stages, a few of which could be quite important for the GC. However, the high mountain stages will be plenty enough to decide who will wear the pink jersey in Turin.
If they will be raced, that is.
Problem is, this edition utterly crushes the 2015 in one comparison: altitude. As a matter of fact, in the 2016 route there are 7 GPMs (!) that are higher than the 2015 Cima Coppi, distributed over 3 stages. Considering the recent history between the weather and the Giro, this is a very bold move from RCS. One can only hope we'll get a nice, warm May this year.
Anyway, on paper this is a nice route, hampered by only one clear flaw: the placement of the TTs. If the ITT of stage 9 could prevent the riders going all out on the sterrato the day before, the MTT of stage 15 could make even more damage to the riders' attitude in the Dolomites. This is particularly disappointing considering that a very easy fix would be swapping stage 15 and 16, something that is logistically possible and would make the route so much better...
Let me introduce...
THE 99TH GIRO!!!
The 2016 Giro can be seen as a confirmation of the trend set by the 2015 edition, that broke up with the MTF overkill pattern that the Giro was adopting, culminated with the 2014 edition. The 2016 Giro has only one top category MTF, and only one other MTF on something that can be called a proper climb. With the grand-total of 2 proper MTFs, this Giro is almost the polar opposite of its 2014 self, that had 8 MTFs (six 1st cat. and two 2nd cat.). With respect to its more handsome brother 2015 though, this Giro appears a bit anemic. It features less things: fewer kilometers against the clock (although it does have more TT stages), fewer mountain stages. It is not as balanced as last year, with the pure climbers getting buffed by a MTT and a twistier and shorter ITT. On the bright side, the TTT disappeared for the first time in quite a few years. It won't be missed.
As for the flat stages, this edition is quite sprinter-friendly, featuring no less than 5 sure sprints and other 2 stages that could and probably will go to the fast men. But that is often the case with the Giro starting abroad.
Like 2015 this Giro will feature a healthy amount of hilly stages, a few of which could be quite important for the GC. However, the high mountain stages will be plenty enough to decide who will wear the pink jersey in Turin.
If they will be raced, that is.
Problem is, this edition utterly crushes the 2015 in one comparison: altitude. As a matter of fact, in the 2016 route there are 7 GPMs (!) that are higher than the 2015 Cima Coppi, distributed over 3 stages. Considering the recent history between the weather and the Giro, this is a very bold move from RCS. One can only hope we'll get a nice, warm May this year.
Anyway, on paper this is a nice route, hampered by only one clear flaw: the placement of the TTs. If the ITT of stage 9 could prevent the riders going all out on the sterrato the day before, the MTT of stage 15 could make even more damage to the riders' attitude in the Dolomites. This is particularly disappointing considering that a very easy fix would be swapping stage 15 and 16, something that is logistically possible and would make the route so much better...