- Mar 31, 2010
- 18,136
- 5
- 0
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Ryo Hazuki said:all I heard were teamorders and "come on"
Liars
Ryo Hazuki said:all I heard were teamorders and "come on"
Liars
Dekker_Tifosi said:Then again, it shows removing the ears won't have any effect.
Most of the time the team ds just said "be in front, come on guys". or "bring leader in front" and at the end "we ride for 3rd place"/garmin...
BM1979 said:Did you expect anything different though?
Astana1 said:Since I don't think it makes a difference whether they have them or not I think they should have them. Keep in mind the TV producer only let us see what they thought would be interesting. All of the safety and admin stuff that happens on the radio could have been omitted.
Astana1 said:Since I don't think it makes a difference whether they have them or not I think they should have them. Keep in mind the TV producer only let us see what they thought would be interesting. All of the safety and admin stuff that happens on the radio could have been omitted.
Astana1 said:Since I don't think it makes a difference whether they have them or not I think they should have them. Keep in mind the TV producer only let us see what they thought would be interesting. All of the safety and admin stuff that happens on the radio could have been omitted.
BM1979 said:While i agree that probably did happen in the Tv Coverage i look at the situation where Farah was willing to ride and was directed not too.
If you were a company thinking about getting in the game ,who knew nothing about cycling, you would just sit there and think what a corrupt sport it is , there is no positive spin you can put on it from a fans or sponsors perspective IMO
Astana1 said:Seems to me that the only groups of people who care are the UCI and some of the hardest of the hard core bike geeks such as us.
I don't think the sponsors care at all. Cycling is what it is, and the use of radios in racing is so arcane that the mainstream weekend viewers that the sponsors are targeting probably don't give a damn.
Mellow Velo said:I don't get this: "The tv producer only let us see what he thought would be interesting." argument.
I thought these were live links, in which case no one knew what the DSs were about to come out with..........a bit risque, imo.![]()
Ryo Hazuki said:all I heard were teamorders and "come on"
Liars
Astana1 said:I'm not sure how truly live they were. If a DS said something interesting and it failed to make the telecast because of commercials or something else, I am certain that the producer would not miss the opportunity to replay it. It's pretty simple really. Sometimes what they were saying was pretty boring actually.
But I'm glad they caught the bit about JV telling his riders to stop working and ride for the bunch sprint. It certainly helps paint the picture.
Barrus said:Well there were no commercials in the original broadcast, so no problem was made of that. But the commentators specifically stated that it was not live just to ensure that there would be no corruption of the manner in which the race went.
El Imbatido said:cobblestoned to appear and defend DS's everywhere in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1...........
BM1979 said:While i agree that probably did happen in the Tv Coverage i look at the situation where Farah was willing to ride and was directed not too.
If you were a company thinking about getting in the game ,who knew nothing about cycling, you would just sit there and think what a corrupt sport it is , there is no positive spin you can put on it from a fans or sponsors perspective IMO