Re:
RedheadDane said:
I think it depend on a whole lot of varieties.
For example regarding road-width:
The Koppenberg may be only about three metre wide, but it's a rather steep climb which means that the riders are spread out over a distance.
However, a three metre wide road would probably not be a very good idea for a fast bunch sprint.
As for cars; there
have been examples of team cars being unable to follow riders up a climb, so they just had to use a moto-bike instead.
Of course, as we've seen several examples of recently, too many race vehicles can be a bit of a problem.
Thanks to everybody for the answer.
(I didnt mean about that with the clinic)
I have read all the UCI rules and as well the UCI guide for organizers. There are some things no clear.
What I understand, after to talk with people os spanish federation and some cyclist is that the
difference between road cycling and other cycling as MTB, ciclocross,.. it is no mainly the kind of surfade, as we can see in Tro Bro Leon, Herning, Roubaix or other races, but
it is the motor vehicules who follow the race. The route must allow these vehicules to go, so there are lot of paces where a road bike can go, but not a car, and in that case that route is not possible, not allowed in fact.
A man told me that once whach a race where they crossed a medieval bridge and the cars went for a paralel newer bridge. But that is a short exception who organizers try to avoid.
But the fact is that there are some exceptions.
Some times I think there are some parts of a race where team cars go for an alternative route, I am not very sure, but I think so.
Some people told me that some cars: director, Jury, must always go, but with the rest could go some exceptions. I am not sure
I know is difficult to answer my question, I just want to know if someone can answer these ones, or at least something in relation:
1. Must always cars go with cyclist? It is possible sometimes just motorbikes? for example, 2 km narrow road (2 metres), with an alternative road of 4 km.
2. The same for ambulances, always in all the route or is POSSIBLE some exceptions, with segurity?
3. In the case cars must go, I understand 3 meters is the minimum wide, but, maybe 2,5 m sould be alowed for 1 Km? (it is enough to stop a car (about 2 m) and allow a rider to go. I say 3 meters becouse is the minimum i see in koppenberg, in tro Bro Leon (sometime less, but it is just one point, a gate or ssomething like that.
4. Then hight. that is important, UCi rules said car high must be 1 62, but cars go with bikes above, so if team cars must go always for the route, some archs are impossible to cross in a race.
I show you examples:
it is not the case, but imagine I am a race organizer and i want to do an sterrato to do a race over that naroow track. of course is cheaper and better for the landcape if the sterrato is a road of 2.5 meters than 3 or 4.
The same over here, this is about 2.5, it would be enough for cars and bikes, and ambulances?
(I dont mean the steps)
This kind or archs, I understand is not possible, except cars are not always along the route of cyclist, not only narrow, but hight.
You say in your answers you know about some exceptions, could you be more accurate in that?
In the past, this is a race, and this is Eddy:
I dont know if I got to explain myself, it woukld be a good help if someone Knows something or some people who can help me. or maybe I must writte UCI.
Anyway if you dont know, could be interesting your opinion about where must be the limit about the route in pro road cycling, considering vehicule, and how you consider exceptions shoud be to improve routes, landscape and spectacle, with security.
In the polemic TTT of the Vuelta, it was really narrow for cars, less than 2.5 meters but a TTT is not a road race where cars must sometimes to pass cyclist, and things as jesper Skibbi in Koppenberg could happen.
Cheers.