RedheadDane said:
And where did Andrew come from?
It comes - as many rider nicknames on the forum - from Wonderlance. I think the original line was "Andrew giving his bike a service"
They are both in pretty good shape, and their preparation has gone pretty much exactly according to plan so far, except maybe for Fränk's crash and DNF at Paris-Nice but it appears that didn't do any harm. As someone mentioned earlier they do not have 1 gram of fat too much right now. I therefore have humble hopes that their spring campain will be better than last year (which was a bit of a disaster).
The last couple of years Fränk always had a better early-season form than Andy: he had a nice win in California in front of Nibali and strong P-N performances. It appears he reaches his top-form faster than Andy, or else can keep it longer.
As for their TT'ing - Fränk has shown recently that he can limit his losses, one might even say hold his own, in TT's between 10 and 20 km, at least if we judge from TdS/Criterium. Nonetheless I was surprised to see him do so well today, as he usually does horribly in prologues, and had some problems with his new TT position in Paris-Nice. However once it gets longer than that he is pretty bad - as in the Vuelta last year for example.
Andy on the other hand sucks at TT's all year long, except at the ones in the end of GT's, where he does OK. I attribute this to the extra motivation he gets from the prospect of a podium finish or even a win (Giro 07 and Tour 10, also known as the "Sastre 2008 effect"), as well as the fact that one of his biggest strengths is his recovery. Because of his good recovery, he makes up a bit against others, who are smashed at the end of a GT.
Today I thought his position looked quite good for his standarts. His bad time might be due, among other factors, to bad legs, or the fact that he hit a gutter and almost crashed, or got distracted by a random car that got out of the way just in time in a roundabout